Indian Missiles & Space technology Pictures

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
"Tsar Bomba"-The biggest nuke ever

"Tsar Bomba"-The biggest nuke ever

YouTube - Tsar bomba


Tsar Bomba (Russian: Царь-бомба), literally "Tsar-bomb," is the nickname for the RDS-202 hydrogen bomb (codenamed "Ivan" by its developers)—the largest, most powerful nuclear weapon ever detonated.

Developed by the Soviet Union, the bomb was originally designed to have a yield of about 100 megatons of TNT; however, the bomb was reduced by half in order to limit the amount of nuclear fallout that would result. One bomb was built and tested on October 30, 1961, in the Novaya Zemlya archipelago.[1] The weapon never entered service.

Tsar Bomba - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

IBRIS

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
1,402
Likes
796
Country flag
 
Last edited by a moderator:

IBRIS

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
1,402
Likes
796
Country flag




A bomb of this magnitude has tremendous "blow back" potential to its user, while at the same time being inefficient in radiating much of its energy out into space.
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
Should India develop a RAJ bomb , like the Soviet's Tsar bomb ?

Should India develop a RAJ bomb , like the Soviet's Tsar bomb ? We are aware htat the 50 Meg tsar bomb was never comissioned into service and that it was delivered by aircraft . The didnt figure out a missile delivery system for it.

Consider the possibility if india developed a less potent say 35 Meg device and being smaller , they might with today's technology and enhanced ability figure out a missile capable of delivering that device .

Wouldnt that achievement itself act as a deterrent to say china ? even if the numbers produces were small, i think it would prove to some extent that india has " arrived" at some important juncture and speak millions to china , besides the actual possiblity of usage in really dire circumstances, if it came to that and so - a deterrent !?
 

Vladimir79

Professional
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1,404
Likes
82
Should India develop a RAJ bomb , like the Soviet's Tsar bomb ? We are aware htat the 50 Meg tsar bomb was never comissioned into service and that it was delivered by aircraft . The didnt figure out a missile delivery system for it.
No it should not. Tsar Bomba was cancelled due to the massive fallout that killed 900 people in Siberia. Smaller nukes are not nearly as bad for the rest of planet and are more effective at wiping out cities with MRV warheads.

Consider the possibility if india developed a less potent say 35 Meg device and being smaller , they might with today's technology and enhanced ability figure out a missile capable of delivering that device .

Wouldnt that achievement itself act as a deterrent to say china ? even if the numbers produces were small, i think it would prove to some extent that india has " arrived" at some important juncture and speak millions to china , besides the actual possiblity of usage in really dire circumstances, if it came to that and so - a deterrent !?
It doesn't serve any purpose except for people to say India is being irresponsible. 200-400kt MRV nukes targetted at specific points of a city are far more efficient at wiping it out than a 30-50mt bomb and doesn't pollute the planet nearly as much.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
yeah u r correct vladmir, the citie like Islambad or karachi are so near to Indian borders,that would definitely show effect on our side, we need less radiation and more effective bombs.
 

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
Considering China has 4 Meg device, india cannot be satisfied with 200k - 400K devices - psychologicaly less deterrent value as well : AS for irresposibility what about those nations which have so much stockpiles as to be able to destroy the whole planed 30 times and a bit more ?
So india need to develop a lot more in this area even to the extent of sacrificing some of the other conventional weapions develpment .
Ok if not 35 Meg ( which was just a manner of speaking ) then at least to be on par with our northeastern neighbour so say 6 or 8 Meg should be fine and easily deliverable by missile .
As for it being too large to be used against pakistan . hey man OF COURSE - no one who considers themselves sane would be doing that ? even the much smaller nukes suchas 20 K's are inadvisable , especially know that india can handle pak simply by conventional means
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
No it should not. Tsar Bomba was cancelled due to the massive fallout that killed 900 people in Siberia. Smaller nukes are not nearly as bad for the rest of planet and are more effective at wiping out cities with MRV warheads.



It doesn't serve any purpose except for people to say India is being irresponsible. 200-400kt MRV nukes targetted at specific points of a city are far more efficient at wiping it out than a 30-50mt bomb and doesn't pollute the planet nearly as much.
Vlad.....Do you know what was the environmental impact on the Novaya Zemlya peninsula as a result of these test. Did it wipe out all the wild-life there ??

Are there any good articles in English about this ??
 

Supersallu

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2009
Messages
15
Likes
0
Why do we need bombs with high yield when we have such sophisticated delivery system which have CEP of 10 m only?
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
[mod]Seriously don't require this thread as all the arguments on yield have been going on in other threads. Thread closed.[/mod]
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
Brahmos Test from different Launch Pad on Different dates

Brahmos Test from different Launch Pad on Different dates

Test of Universal Missile

YouTube - BrahMos test

may be this can be called as Brahmos History.
when and where tested full details are given in this video.
but in Russian Language.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
but i never found it any where so i posted.
but nice info about all tests of Brahmos.
 

bhramos

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
25,625
Likes
37,233
Country flag
but i never found it any where so i posted.
but nice info about all tests of Brahmos.
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157
Indian Missiles & Military Gear Pictures

[mod]thread for indian missiles and other military gear, remember non-cpoyright pics first on gallery then on post copyrighted pictures here with due credit[/mod]
 

A.V.

New Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
6,503
Likes
1,157











The Astra, built by the Defence R&D Laboratory (DRDL), Hyderabad, will allow IAF pilots to hit enemy aircraft up to 44 km away, at altitudes up to 20,000 metres. Improving on that will be the Astra Mk II, with a longer range of 80 km
The Astra’s seeker is still imported from Russia, but the DRDO hopes to develop one
A drawback in the Astra remains its high weight; even a heavy fighter like the Sukhoi-30MKI cannot carry the missile on its wingtip stations. In comparison with the Astra’s estimated 150 kg, other BVR missiles like the Israeli Derby weigh around 100 kg only
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top