Blackwater
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2012
- Messages
- 21,156
- Likes
- 12,211
it is phasto, cant u recognize itsorry we dont speak bihari here, please use Roman Hindi or Urdu.
Even Sri Lankan king was so much influenced by Ashoka that he named himself as Devnam Piyadasi.With Lankans, ill treatment of Tamils began mostly after spread of Angarika Dharmapala type of puritan Sectarian Buddhism & glorification of Sinhalese by spreading fables about how they are true Aryans.
I find it laughable that this Lankan kid is whining about how Indians are forcing an Indian identity on them when it's their own chronicle Mahavamasa that states the forefathers of Sinhalese, Vijaya & 700 men from lata desha who came on a boat, were north Indian , its their own Angarika who was desperate to coopt a mythical north Indian Aryan ancestry for Sinhalese. Mahavamsa is a Lankan work. Angarika was Lankan. Most Indian don't give a damn about Lanka or who they fraudulently claim to be, we just care about protecting our Geo strategic interests. Please get that straight.
Even Sri Lankan king was so much influenced by Ashoka that he named himself as Devnam Piyadasi.
If he was one of the greatest Hindu ever, why not convert into Buddhism and learn what he said.What made you think that Hinduism is not a unified religion ?
Gautam Buddha was one of the greatest Hindu ever ...
Dharmapala was misguided and wrong about Sinhalese origins. Bear in mind that he lived in the late 19th century when there were very little was known about Sinhalese and Sinhalese history.With Lankans, ill treatment of Tamils began mostly after spread of Angarika Dharmapala type of puritan Sectarian Buddhism & glorification of Sinhalese by spreading fables about how they are true Aryans.
I find it laughable that this Lankan kid is whining about how Indians are forcing an Indian identity on them when it's their own chronicle Mahavamasa that states the forefathers of Sinhalese, Vijaya & 700 men from lata desha who came on a boat, were north Indian , its their own Angarika who was desperate to coopt a mythical north Indian Aryan ancestry for Sinhalese. Mahavamsa is a Lankan work. Angarika was Lankan. Most Indian don't give a damn about Lanka or who they fraudulently claim to be, we just care about protecting our Geo strategic interests. Please get that straight.
Hinduism has very vague description on divinity. Therefore, it is no surprise to me that Hindu's can worship any god if it's falls under the limits set up by Hindu scriptures.First you were saying that North and South have different gods and now you deliberately changed it saying "in the past". Hindus Worship same gods. May be their rituals and practices are different but not gods. BTW what religion do you practice? Polytheism doesn't mean, one group worships one form of god and one group worships one form of god. They worship the same form but practice of worship is different. Ganesh, Hanuman, Vishnu, Shiva, Krishna, Rama all have their Individual forms and all Hindus acknowledge their existence.
Your understanding of polytheism shows how unguided you are in such matters. Do your research. Tell me one thing, In India, Christians exist in North and South, does that mean they worship different kinds of Jesus/Christ?
Chandigarh was also a planned city. Anyhow, my point is not building new cities. But why can't Indians beautify the old haphazardly developed old cities?If you know, I was talking of other cities better than Mumbai.
OT: Mumbai is too densely populated to change. So, there's a new City called New Mumbai is being developed.
It is well planned and can be called a Shanghai at least if not New York.
If your bro didn't like Bangalore, send him to Chandigarh.
Conducting a research on how not to be dirty, selfish and stupid citizens.Anyway, what was he doing in Bangalore? I thought Sri Lanka is like Singapore of Subcontinent.
Gautam Buddha was against certain section of Hindu society [priest class] and not Hindu as a religion...If he was one of the greatest Hindu ever, why not convert into Buddhism and learn what he said.
GOD is one and only one... there can be any view of it ... Hinduism does not restrict anyone if one wants to see almighty god in a particular way...How can Hinduism be unified when different people can worship different gods. Hinduism has very loose concepts on the god.
Buddha rejected any claim to gods. He didn't teach to adhere to the rituals and god worshiping. God as a concept was irrelevant to him.Gautam Buddha was against certain section of Hindu society [priest class] and not Hindu as a religion...
Gautam Buddha interpreted Hinduism in a different way... I am fine with it ... but it is Hinduism...
Almost all of India along with the great King Ashok also converted to Buddhism ... but you see there after all again converted back to Hinduism ...
There is no difference between Hinduism and Buddhism...
Do you say Mahayana Buddhism is different from TIBETIAN Buddhism or Tantric Buddhism ?
.
GOD is one and only one... there can be any view of it ... Hinduism does not restrict anyone if one wants to see almighty god in a particular way...
I understand the fact that Sri Lankan economy will integrate more with Indian economy. But what me and other Sri Lankans oppose is the Bullying attitude of the Indian government to keep Sri Lanka in line and there influence. Sri Lanka has nothing to expect from India in development sector. India does not invest in Sri Lanka for Sri Lankans benefit.Like i said in the other thread , If Sri Lanka wants to grow it needs India. China will at best use her as a fueling & repair depot(They're using Pakistan as a highway to the sea). Sri Lanka will continue to grow and post the highest per capita GDP in Asia by 2050 with average incomes touching 66,000$ nearly 50% of Germany there(yes they're ahead of both us a& the Chinese there) Indian per capita gdp shall touch approximately 35-40000$ by 2050. The Total Sri Lankan GDP will still be much lower though with only 1.3$tr to the Indian GDP of approximately 55$ tr by 2050.
The fact remains that whether @HeinzGud likes it or not his nation will be more integrated with India due to simple economic complusions.
That said id like to express my distress at how a simple economic and foreign policy thread has denigrated into a xenophobic mess, the mods @pmaitra @Singh @Yusuf need to crack the whip.
No one will invest in Sri Lanka or for that matter in any other nation for that nation's benefit, all investors come with a simple purpose to make money. Sri Lanka simply happens to be a place where both India and China can see investments multiply and provide profit.I understand the fact that Sri Lankan economy will integrate more with Indian economy. But what me and other Sri Lankans oppose is the Bullying attitude of the Indian government to keep Sri Lanka in line and there influence. Sri Lanka has nothing to expect from India in development sector. India does not invest in Sri Lanka for Sri Lankans benefit.