So many researches are going on to understand about these Genes , all homo sapiens are having DNA sequences within the 23 chromosome pairs which are different from people to people within any nation . But people can have same sequences even when they are from different background.I am talking about the filtering of strong genes done by the nature to humans. In Scandinavia they rely majorly on hunting and fishing. So the guy must be string to survive and only the string will survive through out centuries.
Where as in the region we find vegetation people do not need to go through tough routine to gather food.
So based on the natural selection one can say the people who lived for generations in tough environments do have strong genes.
Then there are other factors which differentiate an Asian male with that of Europeans.
Regarding African Americans living in USA they eat more meat and do less physical routine reason why these guys are rated obese, But an African hunter is physically fit even though he may not follow correct diet like the US citizens of African descent.
So many researches are going on to understand about these Genes , all homo sapiens are having DNA sequences within the 23 chromosome pairs which are different from people to people within any nation . But people can have same sequences even when they are from different background.
Stronger genes or weaker genes are there because of climatic conditions but now with the science and technology all can have stronger genes.
And you don't think this goes both ways? A lot of us here cannot seem to understand just which part of your anatomy you use to construct such meaningful threads.I just realized that I can't relate to Indians and Indian culture as most of it is rooted in Hinduism which I don't believe in. Also they speak weird language and weird customs. Is it that because I come from a peripheral culture I am unique?
What ? tell meGuess what OP is ?
you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of evolution or natural selection. No such thing as strong or weak genes.I am talking about the filtering of strong genes done by the nature to humans. In Scandinavia they rely majorly on hunting and fishing. So the guy must be string to survive and only the string will survive through out centuries.
Where as in the region we find vegetation people do not need to go through tough routine to gather food.
So based on the natural selection one can say the people who lived for generations in tough environments do have strong genes.
Then there are other factors which differentiate an Asian male with that of Europeans.
Regarding African Americans living in USA they eat more meat and do less physical routine reason why these guys are rated obese, But an African hunter is physically fit even though he may not follow correct diet like the US citizens of African descent.
Yay!!!! you even did a face palm ......you don't even have a rudimentary understanding of evolution or natural selection. No such thing as strong or weak genes.
That's because you live in india.Simply put, you have identity crisis and are confused. I mentioned this in one of your initial threads but you took severe umbrage and kept the outrage going for several days after my initial comment.
I am Agnostic too, though I am born in a Hindu family. I hardly follow any typical Indian customs or traditions. Yet, I cannot identify myself as anything other than an Indian.
Umm no..... Please stop posting.Yay!!!! you even did a face palm ......
There is a thing called gene which defines the characteristics of living things and genes are classified as weak gene and strong genes.
Homosexual.What ? tell me
You are confusing Dominance with natural selection, if they are the fittest and survive they will pass their genes to their ancestors and you could call their genes stronger, but that same gene can be recessive or dominant.Yay!!!! you even did a face palm ......
...
So the guys living in tough conditions and need to do hunting for good as a daily routine must be physically fit, must have good stamina and also must have strength and physique.
if any one with weak physique is born he will not survive because of various factors.
natural selection and these guys pass their genes to their children. Their off springs will have their ancestor traits and the so the strong gene propagates.
But for people living in plains , there is a high chance of propagation of weak genes since they rely on vegetation more.
Dominance and natural selection are both related to each other, a dominant gene which has good physical characteristics is a candidate for natural selection and to survive.You are confusing Dominance with natural selection, if they are the fittest and survive they will pass their genes to their ancestors and you could call their genes stronger, but that same gene can be recessive or dominant.
If recessive then as soon as your tall, beatifull, strong, wild nordic will find a dominant gene in a woman from "plain" regions you will trash all that evolution process you were talking about...
That was a visceral reaction. Upon reflection, it doesn't seem so plausible that there's something intrinsically wrong with her dating a white guy. Most Indians would never arrive at this conclusion, at least not via the same method. Indians only have instinctive or visceral beliefs; they lack the mental capability required for contemplation, reflection and logical thinking.Aren't you the same guy who was complaining that your sister was dating a white guy?
Believe me you relate to Indians more than many liberal indians themselves...
How does one pass his genes to his ancestors?You are confusing Dominance with natural selection, if they are the fittest and survive they will pass their genes to their ancestors and you could call their genes stronger, but that same gene can be recessive or dominant.
If recessive then as soon as your tall, beatifull, strong, wild nordic will find a dominant gene in a woman from "plain" regions you will trash all that evolution process you were talking about...
Can you stop talking about genetics? You don't know much about it and besides, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Thanks.Dominance and natural selection are both related to each other, a dominant gene which has good physical characteristics is a candidate for natural selection and to survive.
WHat's so beautiful about nordics? They look like they have no souls. I don't find them attractive. TO hell with european/white racist worldview.You are confusing Dominance with natural selection, if they are the fittest and survive they will pass their genes to their ancestors and you could call their genes stronger, but that same gene can be recessive or dominant.
If recessive then as soon as your tall, beatifull, strong, wild nordic will find a dominant gene in a woman from "plain" regions you will trash all that evolution process you were talking about...
WHat's so beautiful about nordics? They look like they have no souls. I don't find them attractive. TO hell with european/white racist worldview.
Can you stop talking about genetics? You don't know much about it and besides, it has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Thanks.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Indian-Greece Relations | Foreign Relations | 85 | ||
Ill -treatment of Indian transit passengers - Doklam related | China | 2 | ||
V | Indian-Islamic (Muslims) Nations relations excluding Pak | Foreign Relations | 7 | |
P | DRDO Annual Report 2014-15 indian Army related news | Indian Army | 0 |