sayareakd
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 17,734
- Likes
- 18,952
majority wins................ when it was put to vote in cabinate.Wasn`t anthony against it.If yes then how come cabinet clears it
majority wins................ when it was put to vote in cabinate.Wasn`t anthony against it.If yes then how come cabinet clears it
but then one is ignoring views of Minister of defence . it is his minister and his views should have highest piorirty .majority wins................ when it was put to vote in cabinate.
The Govt is desperate for money to fund Sonia Gandhi silly Food for Security that is inherent with total flaw and thoughtless populism.News Breaking on Headlines Today:
Cabinet clears 100% FDI in defence and Telecom. No change to Aviation.
@pmaitra @Ray @Kunal Biswas @The Messiah @sayareakd @Decklander
Wasn`t anthony against it.If yes then how come cabinet clears it
As such they already have the last laugh. There is no development or encouragement for local platform neither by local defense forces nor the government. The INSAS is a case in point.Today it is FDI in defence next will be dilution of 30% offset clause. Most likely Khangrass will change the rules to include investment in JVs as part of Offset clause which will ensure that Indians get nothing and the foreign firms have the last laugh.
Govt. employees will riot. Truestoraay.5) Promotions based on deliverables for the employees
6) Funding for each organisation should also be based on deliverables.
India's relaxation of foreign investment rules, aimed at drawing funds needed to turn around slowing economic growth and support a crumbling rupee, barely lifted markets on Wednesday due to doubts whether long-term inflows would materialize anytime soon.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh eased FDI rules late on Tuesday for several industries, including insurance and telecoms, although some of the liberalization measures fell short of expectations or came with caveats.
The long-pending move to increase the foreign direct investment (FDI) cap in insurance from 26 to 49 percent, for example, still needs approval from parliament, where a bill has been stuck for months.
It shouldn't but it always takes an alarm to wake up the government of India. The Americans rang one loudly, the rupee was slipping badly and the FDI flows were drying fast, that even the UPA couldn't ignore the economic mess anymore.
The timing of the new measures on raising FDI caps, including in the "holy cow" sectors of defence and insurance is significant. The announcement came three days after three top UPA ministers returned from Washington where they met a range of US corporates and officials with a long list of complaints.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh ostensibly acted on the recommendations of the Mayaram Committee. But the sudden energy to implement a report perhaps came with the realization that a weight-bearing pillar of Indo-US relations needed major repairs – the American business community. US companies needed to be reassured that the India story continues.
Indian (SENSEX) stocks rebounded from the biggest decline in two weeks after the government approved plans to liberalize foreign investment rules to boost growth.
The S&P BSE Sensex advanced 0.4 percent to 19,926.55 at 9:29 a.m. in Mumbai, after falling the most since July 3 yesterday. Engineering company Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (LT) advanced 1.3 percent. Cigarette maker ITC Ltd. (ITC), which has the highest weightage on the index, surged to a record.
Reforms approved yesterday will allow overseas investors to own all of an Indian telephone company, and increase the 26 percent limit in defense production on a case-by-case basis. The government has been reviewing caps on foreign investment as it strives to lure funds to help spur a struggling economy and finance a current-account deficit that helped push the rupee to a record low this month.
Faced with a harsh economic environment, the government on Tuesday opened the doors to greater foreign investment in almost a dozen sectors, including telecom and the tightly-policed defence, for "state-of-the-art" technology.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh moved in to iron out differences between various wings of the government to push through the fresh round of opening up to boost dwindling confidence in the Indian economy. Apart from telecom and defence, there were two segments of the financial sector - asset reconstruction companies and credit information bureaus - where the FDI ceiling was raised.
Seems like Antony got his way. Plus, does this in any way encourage corruption?The FDI cap in defence will remain at 26% and proposals beyond that will be considered by the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) on case to case basis, according to a government decision which showed that defence ministry prevailed over the commerce ministry.
Despite clamours for increasing the FDI cap to 49 percent, the government has not budged. The rationale? An increase in the FDI cap is based on the assumption that higher investment would impinge upon national security, ruin domestic technological development and destroy the nascent indigenous industry.
"FDI cap is 26% in defence sector, that stands like that. Any FDI proposal beyond 26% which brings state-of-the-art technology, that proposal would be considered by the CCS," commerce minister Anand Sharma said yesterday.
And here lies the devil. The definition of state-of-the-art technology would be determined by the defence ministry, he said.
State-of-the art needs to be defined carefully, but going by the government's track record this is unlikely due to lack of clarity on the policy front.
India's Defence Minister A.K. AntonyIndia's Defence Minister A.K. Antony
A research paper by Amit Cowshish from the Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses asks a pertinent question.
Would the ministry of defence relax the FDI cap if the foreign vendor wants to set up a wholly owned subsidiary for absorbing the technology?
For defence minister AK Antont reducing dependence on foreign players is imperative to control corruption. As this Firstpost article noted earlier, allowing more FDI in defence beyond 26 percent on a "case-by-case" basis just implies more scope for bribery.
Between 2012 and 2020, India is expected to spend $150 billion to replace its outdated equipment and expand its military. By capping the limit the government is not only preventing foreign companies from sharing technologies with local partners but also allowing PSU defence companies an advantage over private players.
According to Cowshish, FDI in defence will not only bring capital, but also technology, skilled manpower, and employment since it will allow the transfer of resources that are required to kick start indigenous green field research, design and development projects.
S N Misra, senior officer in the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, in a column last year had pointed out that the total inflow of resources to the defence industry between April 2000 and May 2010 amounted to a meagre $ 0.15 million, a fraction of the inflow into sectors that attract high-value FDI, namely services, computer software and hardware, and telecommunications, among others.
In fact, India is tipped to become the world's third-largest defence spender after the US and China by next year, and equipment spending is reckoned to be $80-100 billion in the next 5 years. But without tweaking the FDI norms large foreign suppliers of defence equipment will not be interested in putting up supply bases in India.
Will indigenisation be fast enough for India to achieve its defence needs internally at a time when the country is anyway importing most of its defence needs?
"The allocation for capital acquisitions had been growing significantly in the last ten to fifteen years, opening up good opportunities for the Indian private industry but there have not been many significant indigenous breakthroughs in research, design and development of new equipment and weapon systems. In fact, India has now become the largest importer of the defence wares. This suggests that either the industry does not have the financial capacity to invest in research, design and development or it has the capital but it is unwilling to invest because of some other reasons," argues Cowshish
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's persistence to get Union Defence Minister A K Antony and Commerce and Industry Minister Anand Sharma to arrive at a consensus on the foreign direct investment (FDI) in the defence sector has paid off, with the two senior ministers agreeing to maintain the status quo of 26 per cent cap in foreign investments in the sector.