INSAS Rifle, LMG & Carbine

darshan978

Darth Vader
Regular Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
479
Likes
773
Country flag


JVPC
Ghatak 7.62*39
Excalibur Mk-1

Production of JVPC , GHATAK & Excalibur MK-1 Rifle in full swing. Around 800+ JVPC , 1000+ Ghatak & 600+ Excalibur MK-1s are being produced. More orders are expected in coming months as trials are going on with the Police & CAPFs.
Source: INDRA
Early virsion of excalibur and this is diff.
 

Attachments

Vishal Chandorkar

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
41
Likes
41
Country flag
From what I understand, the Excalibur mk1c and the Insas 1c is the same rifle..chambered for 5.56*45mm. Could someone please confirm.

Also, what is the difference in weight between the Insas 1c/Excalibur mk1c and the OFB developed 7.62*51mm rifle? If someone could give specs of both, would be great to see the difference in their dimensions etc
 

Kshithij

DharmaYoddha
Senior Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
2,242
Likes
1,961
From what I understand, the Excalibur mk1c and the Insas 1c is the same rifle..chambered for 5.56*45mm. Could someone please confirm.

Also, what is the difference in weight between the Insas 1c/Excalibur mk1c and the OFB developed 7.62*51mm rifle? If someone could give specs of both, would be great to see the difference in their dimensions etc
It is unfair to compare weights of guns of calibre 5.56x45 and 7.62x51. They are miles apart in terms of firepower, muzzle energy, magazine weight, cartridge weight and barrel pressure.
 

Vishal Chandorkar

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Messages
41
Likes
41
Country flag
It is unfair to compare weights of guns of calibre 5.56x45 and 7.62x51. They are miles apart in terms of firepower, muzzle energy, magazine weight, cartridge weight and barrel pressure.
Yes, I do understand that.....I just wanted to know for the sake of being aware of how heavier the 7.62x51 gun would be, as compared to the Insas 1c.
 

Kchontha

Regular Member
Joined
May 29, 2017
Messages
784
Likes
1,208
Country flag
From what I understand, the Excalibur mk1c and the Insas 1c is the same rifle..chambered for 5.56*45mm. Could someone please confirm.

Also, what is the difference in weight between the Insas 1c/Excalibur mk1c and the OFB developed 7.62*51mm rifle? If someone could give specs of both, would be great to see the difference in their dimensions etc
Insas excalibur MK1C is chambered in 5.56x45mm and its empty weight is 3.81kg while Insas mk1c chambered in 7.62x51mm and weighs 4.5kg. There will be different weight for the Excalibur if it sports barrels of different length.
 

soikot banerjee

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2017
Messages
195
Likes
787
Country flag
upload_2017-12-15_22-7-16.png

upload_2017-12-15_22-7-46.jpeg


Red Box= INSAS 1c
Black Box= Excalibur MK1
Last Pic=Excalibur

EXCALIBUR RIFLE


EXCALIBUR MK-1



INSAS 1C 5.56*45

From what I understand, the Excalibur mk1c and the Insas 1c is the same rifle..chambered for 5.56*45mm. Could someone please confirm.

Also, what is the difference in weight between the Insas 1c/Excalibur mk1c and the OFB developed 7.62*51mm rifle? If someone could give specs of both, would be great to see the difference in their dimensions etc
 

Twinblade

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
1,578
Likes
3,231
Country flag
From what I understand, the Excalibur mk1c and the Insas 1c is the same rifle..chambered for 5.56*45mm. Could someone please confirm.

Also, what is the difference in weight between the Insas 1c/Excalibur mk1c and the OFB developed 7.62*51mm rifle? If someone could give specs of both, would be great to see the difference in their dimensions etc
There no excalibur mk-1c.

Excalibur mk-1 has stamped steel receiver, insas mk-1c's is milled aluminium.
 

Vorschlaghammer

Regular Member
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
337
Likes
589
Country flag
One thing I've always wondered is the relative advantages and/or disadvantages of the 2 most popular UBGL designs against each other. The Russian GP-25 series seems more practical with it's short barrel, unitary caseless rounds and muzzle loading operation, when comparing against the M203 series and it's longer length for accommodating a breech, and the casing-shell design of the rounds.

Both fire 40mm projectiles at around 250 ft/s, then why exactly did ARDE base the domestic UBGL on the M203 ? They seem a bit too long on the AK, even longer on the Tavors.

@Kunal Biswas thoughts ?
 

Vorschlaghammer

Regular Member
Joined
May 30, 2017
Messages
337
Likes
589
Country flag
Its mostly related to accuracy ..

One cannot put a 40mm UBGL round from GP-30 at center of a window size target from 60ms ..

GP-25/30/34 are best suited within 25-50 ms range, Indirect fire is same as other UBGLs ..
The long barrel does have it's upsides I guess. Do we use rifle grenades, seeing how newer marks on the INSAS doesn't have the barrel ribs for that near the muzzle.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

Articles

Top