- Joined
- Jul 21, 2010
- Messages
- 88
- Likes
- 0
Hafiz Saeed is not pakistani govt. official or representative but Indian Army cheif is the GOI's official and its armed forces' representative.hafiz saeed's opinion can not be said as that of pak govt's official position but on the other hand indian carmy cheif's opinion can be taken as GOI's official position coz he is govt. official.hence in as sense pak. govt's protest is valid.And that dog Hafiz Sayeed's anti India remarks are wise? Another example of the pot calling the kettle black.
Correct. But when Hafiz Sayeed lives under the protection of ISI, it can very well be considered the Pakistani terrorist government's mouthpiece.Hafiz Saeed is not pakistani govt. official or representative but Indian Army cheif is the GOI's official and its armed forces' representative.hafiz saeed's opinion can not be said as that of pak govt's official position but on the other hand indian carmy cheif's opinion can be taken as GOI's official position coz he is govt. official.hence in as sense pak. govt's protest is valid.
Can you prove it????or can the GOI prove it???Correct. But when Hafiz Sayeed lives under the protection of ISI, it can very well be considered the Pakistani terrorist government's mouthpiece.
Are you that dumb OR you are trolling? Open your eyes, read news. Use some common sense too, I know it's rare.Can you prove it????or can the GOI prove it???
Im asking for proof which is admissible in the court of law of the land ...pakistan...not some masala news from TOIlet.Are you that dumb OR you are trolling? Open your eyes, read news. Use some common sense too, I know it's rare.
Job of army chief in not that of making public statements but that of making strategies to defeat enemy plans in the war room.Its the job of GOI to make statement.he said pakistan and china are major irritants for India's security -is some thing wrong ?
irrtants which causes irritation for example - chinese-hacking,stapped visas ,teritoral claim of arunachal.....pakistans terrorist groups causing trouble all this come under irrtation..i dont think their is new in this statement as every one knows
Who are you to seek proof? Haven't we given enough evidence about 26/11? What happened?Im asking for proof which is admissible in the court of law of the land ...pakistan...not some masala news from TOIlet.
No India didnt give enough evidence that could ve implicated hafiz saeed in 26/11.Even indian court would ve thrown that case out.Just for example in this case lakhvi gonna be released unless kasab is examined and they are correct on this.Its court's duty to examine all persons related to the case before pronouncing judgement.Who are you to seek proof? Haven't we given enough evidence about 26/11? What happened?
Btw, does Pakistan have a court of law? It's a jungle out there.
can u reject the isi's hand in terrorist activities out side pakistan .? ISI shares intelligence with Lashkar and provided protection for itIm asking for proof which is admissible in the court of law of the land ...pakistan...not some masala news from TOIlet.
who are we to deside their jobs ... and he is a authorised person of GOI to comment about national securityJob of army chief in not that of making public statements but that of making strategies to defeat enemy plans in the war room.Its the job of GOI to make statement.
You are free to believe Pakistani courts. I don't. Let's come back to topic, instead of deviating from it. Shall we?No India didnt give enough evidence that could ve implicated hafiz saeed in 26/11.Even indian court would ve thrown that case out.Just for example in this case lakhvi gonna be released unless kasab is examined and they are correct on this.Its court's duty to examine all persons related to the case before pronouncing judgement.
Can't proceed 26/11 case unless Kasab, Ansari examined: Pak court
I ve to see the evidence for it before reaching any conclusion...do you have evidence of it?can u reject the isi's hand in terrorist activities out side pakistan .? ISI shares intelligence with Lashkar and provided protection for it
is it not true that mumbai 26/11 master mind is Hafiz Sayeed , what did pakistan do ? and 12 dossier as been given to pakistan till now, what the hell proof do you want my footCan you prove it????or can the GOI prove it???
Even if I have proof, who are you? You don't even exist for people like me. You live in a virtual world & hide behind desktops. It's never cool to be an internet warrior. So, grow up!I ve to see the evidence for it before reaching any conclusion...do you have evidence of it?
note: Evidence which is permissible in court not some newspaper clipping etc.
Duties of Army chief are enshrined in the constitution of democratic republic of india.and ultimately its we the people of india who are supreme and its we who decides everything by voting a govt.Do you know why every ovt official is reffered as public servant in india...coz its the people of india becoz of whom democratic india is there.who are we to deside their jobs ... and he is a authorised person of GOI to comment about national security
Punjab govt gave Rs82m to JD: papers
By Our Staff Reporter
Wednesday, 16 Jun, 2010
LAHORE: The Punjab government gave more than Rs82 million to the Jamatud Dawa (JD) during the outgoing financial year, according to the budget documents for 2010-11.
The supplementary budget for the outgoing fiscal presented before the provincial assembly for its approval reveals that the provincial government gave a grant of Rs79 million to the Markaz-i-Tayyaba, the JD headquarters in Muridke.
Another sum of Rs3 million was given as grants to the schools run by the JD in the different districts of Punjab, according to the supplementary budget 2009-10.
Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah Khan admitted to having given the money to the JD.
He told DawnNews on Tuesday that the money was given to these institutions after the organisation was banned (following the Mumbai attacks on Nov 26, 2008) and administrator was appointed by the government.
The purpose of giving this grant, he said, was to continue the welfare services provided by the organisation's sc hools, dispensaries and hospitals.
A Punjab government spokesman denied having given money to the JD. He clarified that the grant had been given to the administrator for welfare services.
well u only posted articles related to wikileaks ,us slams for leaks their military documents.some of them shows the nexus between them....I ve to see the evidence for it before reaching any conclusion...do you have evidence of it?
note: Evidence which is permissible in court not some newspaper clipping etc.