Search results

Now, our respected lawyer Sir Khawar Qureshi is also became a hero across the border, and on Indian media news channels spotlight? :lol:

Is india focusing now on Harish Salve “ India's Plan A And B”?

No one take ICJ’s decisions and verdicts seriously, you can’t get anything from it, and rather it was just beneficial for us to tell to the whole world who “sponsors” terrorism and who “receives” it, that’s all. I mean, matter of “terrorism”, which was too internationalized and was done from...

Pakistan had hanged an Indian, Sheikh Shamim, on custodies of spying in 1999 and had sentenced others to death over the same charges, and Kulbhushan Jadhav would also see the same providence of droopy, as everyone knows ICJ doesn’t recognize as a court but its verdicts and statements uninitiated...

You know? The 26 people, who are mislaid in India recently your media was telling and saying were our ISI agents, I have enough sources to claim that presents a big time precariously ahead coming to your side, may be an upsetting one. And, there are many Indians living in Afghanistan, Nepal...

For anyone involved in spying and sabotage, the case is tried in military court, a lawyer is assigned to defend the suspect like this Kulbhusan jadhav and the procedure is the same for all foreigners, so he would be soon encounter with this same providence. Jindal transported the message of...

ICJ verdicts and suitcases are toilet papers itself, whole world knows and doesn’t care or give a fly fuck to what they say. So, no protestation should be raised on the responsibility of previous decision of ours which would be done according to our law and considering to national security.

http://www.indiatimes.com/news/india/india-fears-that-pakistan-can-execute-kulbhushan-jadhav-even-as-trial-at-the-hague-is-on-321710.html :lol: http://www.timesnow.tv/timesnewsradio/hindi/india/50392683/we-fear-jadhav-may-be-executed-soon-indias-harish-salve-tells-icj/58683342 :lol:

Nonentity cares of ICJ, only coast-to-coast security interests comes first, that is already unambiguous.

India is dreadfully tried to divert world attention by presenting Kulbhushan's case from a benevolent angle. India has been 'trying to hide its real façade by taking the case of Kulbhushan Jadhav to the ICJ, but in the end nothing would attain only benefited us to internationalize the issue of “...

Pakistan resisted in the ICJ that Kulbhushan was a spy, as shown by his counterfeit passport and it will be up to India to prove he is not a spy and that his confession is not unaffected.

India is latent its case virtuously on the ICJ’s official opposition to the death penalty, without being able to present any indication to prove its claims that Jadhav was kidnapped by Pakistan from Iran. The fact is that India’s case at the ICJ is a rather feeble one and rates to be canned.

Even if the ICJ were to end conscious hearing the case, India will find it difficult to win on the merits, because its all-inclusive strategy seems to rest on the fact that Jadhav was not given consular access while being imprisoned in Pakistan.

Lol, It’s Accomplish, and not yours “accompolish”, learn the spellings first then know the meaning which is = finish, in that sense which I indirectly quoted.

You should watch yourself Indian TV channels and Indian debates, many anchors of your side questioning your government, that “how come this matter is taken to the ICJ?”, and this says and answers a lot.

Even if ICJ receives India’s supplication and asks Pakistan not to execute Jadhav, “nothing can stop Pakistan to go ahead and accomplish him”.

The ICJ is not a conventional court in the severest sense; the ICJ is a ambassadorial body.

Yes, I will agree with you look how Harish Salve was exercising on treadmill despite according to India he should be thinking on a serious issue of case, just saw and watched on “ India Today” while anchor was taking his interview, and he was seen as doing exercise on treadmill as some court...

Preceding time India went trooped a case against Pakistan was by quarrelling the court didn’t have the jurisdiction on matters involving two Commonwealth countries, back in 1999 and that’s why, Pakistan could name dominance of India citing ICJ having no jurisdiction in a case back in in 1999...