pankaj nema
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2009
- Messages
- 10,308
- Likes
- 38,743
Who cares ; I really really like that we have caused so much pain to the enemy :bounce:Time period ?
Last year it was 60 - 80 civies.
______________________________
If they have accepted 832 civilians killed and 3000 injuredye to sab ko pata hai.........paki army ke kitne mare??
fhilhal to sannata hai loc pe.......eidii dene ki taiyari suru hai porkiyo koIf they have accepted 832 civilians killed and 3000 injured
Then we must also see that they refused to disclose their soldiers deaths
Must be huge ; very good :biggrin2:
Now let us open 155 mm and Pinakas
I do.Who cares
Pakis have lost 6000 Men only on the Western frontI do.
4700 ~ Indian troops killed on LoC by Pak Firing since 2001 that apart from wounded troops and dead civilians along with damage to property.
That's why a comparison can only be made when pakis disclose their casualties both military and civilian at a given time period.
Most likely It is recent data- of six month period- I saw one ex-BSF officer saying the retaliation has been more fierce than Op Parakram-This data is useless without the time period....................
Oh god that 4700 myth once again. RTI gives you general info not specific. That RTI stated that India lost total of 4700 men from 2001. Its not 4700 on LOC.I do.
4700 ~ Indian troops killed on LoC by Pak Firing since 2001 that apart from wounded troops and dead civilians along with damage to property.
That's why a comparison can only be made when pakis disclose their casualties both military and civilian at a given time period.
Casualties and losses since 1989I do.
4700 ~ Indian troops killed on LoC by Pak Firing since 2001 that apart from wounded troops and dead civilians along with damage to property.
That's why a comparison can only be made when pakis disclose their casualties both military and civilian at a given time period.