pmaitra
Senior Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 33,262
- Likes
- 19,594
Sure, why not? Statistics have the habit of ignoring the exceptional cases, which you mentioned (if I am understanding you correctly). So, we have to come up with an alternative. The only problem that I see with removing that barrier is that to let in a few potentially good pilots, we might open the doors to a large number of not-so-good pilots. What US is doing is a great example of how this can be achieved, but then, maybe GoI does not have enough resources to train people from all backgrounds and then take an aptitude test to see who is good or bad and instead stick to the 'safer' and more cost effective way to include only that group that has a higher probability of succeeding.Sure thing; but then how come USAF and other NATO countries manage to get general people in just on the basis of preliminary entrance tests? They fly fighter jets too. I am saying that since anyway applicants have to undergo physical and aptitude testing in IAF selection process, then what is the point of putting a concrete barrier to the people of Commerce or even Arts? Who knows they might be sharp students who excelled in science and maths before fancying a field change but had second thoughts later? What if a significant amount of them could clear the IAF entry tests in both physical and mental aspect?
I know what you are saying man. Completely. But choosing a stream doesn't necessarily mean that the person lacks aptitude just because initially he or she chose commerce or arts. Maybe at that time this is what they could have thought they wanted but later would be interested in joining IAF? IAF can always reject them in initial tests if they don't match the performance isn't it?
Maybe someone with more knowledge on this issue can provide us with more details.