US Wasted Billions in Iraq with Few Results: Inspector

asianobserve

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
May 5, 2011
Messages
12,846
Likes
8,556
Country flag
Agence France-Presse on Thursday, March 7th, 2013


After invading Iraq ten years ago, the United States spent $60 billion on a vast reconstruction effort that left behind few successes and a litany of failures, an auditor's report said Wednesday.

The ambitious plan to transform the country after the fall of Saddam Hussein has been marked by half-finished projects and crushed expectations, according to the final report of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, Stuart Bowen.

The aid effort was plagued by in-fighting among US agencies and an improvised "adhocracy" approach, with no one clearly in charge of a massive investment that was supposed to put Iraq on a stable footing, said the report to Congress.

"Management and funding gaps caused hundreds of projects to fall short of promised results, leaving a legacy of bitter dissatisfaction among many Iraqis," it said.

Some of the reconstruction money was stolen, with a number of US military officers and contractors now imprisoned for fraud, while other funds remain unaccounted for to this day, it said.

Of $2.8 billion in Iraqi oil revenues handled by the US Defense Department, officials could not produce documents accounting for the use of about $1.7 billion, including $1.3 billion in fuel purchases, it said.

The lengthy report highlighted some of the worst examples of mismanagement and graft and included interviews with senior Iraqi and US officials who mostly regretted the outcome of the reconstruction program.

"The level of fraud, waste, and abuse in Iraq was appalling," Senator Susan Collins, a Republican from Maine, was quoted as saying.

She was "especially angry when she learned that some reconstruction money found its way into the hands of insurgent groups," the report said.

The review, however, concluded that a program to train and arm Iraqi security forces stood out as a success.

Both Iraqi and US officials agreed that the Americans tended to ignore the advice of Iraqis or never bothered to consult them before launching costly projects, with sometimes disastrous results.

The list of failures included a new police academy with raw sewage leaking through ceilings, a subcontractor charging $900 for a control switch valued at seven dollars and a project to build large prison in Diyala province that was eventually abandoned, despite an investment of $40 million.

Hoping to restore a vital oil and gas pipeline at the al-Fatah bridge, which had been blown up during the US invasion, American officials tried to build a pipeline under the Tigris river at a cost $75 million.

A geological study had predicted that drilling in the sandy soil under the river would doom the attempt and the warning proved correct. After the project failed, the pipeline and bridge were fixed, but at an additional cost of $29 million.

Iraqi officials recounted a bewildering array of US bureaucrats and contractors who rushed through poorly planned projects while arguing among themselves.

"Not only was there no coordination between the Department of State, the Pentagon and the CPA (coalition provisional authority), they were fighting each other," Fuad Hussein, chief of staff to the Kurdish regional government's president, Massoud Barzani, told the inspector general.

"The policy was to control the Ministries of Oil, Interior, and Defense completely, but if you know nothing about the culture you're trying to control, the result is chaos," he said.

The US commander credited with rescuing the war effort and containing sectarian violence, David Petraeus, offered the report's authors a more optimistic view.

The reconstruction program brought "colossal benefits to Iraq," said Petraeus, while acknowledging mistakes made immediately after the invasion, including disbanding the Iraqi army.

"Over time, we got the electricity infrastructure running and the oil industry working again, and, thanks to these efforts, the country began generating significant oil revenues," Petraeus was quoted as saying. The four-star general went on to lead the CIA before resigning last year over an extra-marital affair.

A senior diplomat, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, told the auditors that in any future aid effort, the United States should move with more caution and not expect to "do it all and do it our way."


Read more: US wasted billions in Iraq with few results: inspector | Defense & Security News at DefenceTalk
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
A senior diplomat, Deputy Secretary of State William Burns, told the auditors that in any future aid effort, the United States should move with more caution and not expect to "do it all and do it our way."
There should be no aid efforts at all related to military missions. The goal should be to destroy the enemy and then leave.
 

satish007

Senior Member
Joined
May 7, 2011
Messages
1,458
Likes
203
US not only let a participator pay for 9/11, but control a big oil producing area and get the respect from all over the world.
who can evaluate the value of last one using money?
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
There should be no aid efforts at all related to military missions. The goal should be to destroy the enemy and then leave.
Who was the enemy in Iraq? What was the reason? Who benefited from the sham reconstruction? I heard one Dick Cheney was the president of some company that won all contracts.

America has a lot to answer on the Iraq war. It was a sham and was not necessary. The worse part is that it botched the post war scene so badly that it has no favors from Iraqis now. If the war was bad, the post war effort by the US was worse. It reminds me of India. Contracts are for just making money while no work is done.
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
$900 for a $7 switch. I get you will get the same switch for under $1 from china. I wish I had got some contract in Iraq :D
 

anoop_mig25

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,804
Likes
3,151
Country flag
they should have invested in afgaistan instead of iraq , that would have solved problem , but iraq had oil , while afganistan has desert
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Who was the enemy in Iraq? What was the reason? Who benefited from the sham reconstruction? I heard one Dick Cheney was the president of some company that won all contracts.

America has a lot to answer on the Iraq war. It was a sham and was not necessary. The worse part is that it botched the post war scene so badly that it has no favors from Iraqis now. If the war was bad, the post war effort by the US was worse. It reminds me of India. Contracts are for just making money while no work is done.
For some reason, Iraq War has been separated from the Gulf War which preceded it.

Timeline of the Gulf War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Timeline of the Gulf War begins in August 2, 1990 and ended on February 28, 1991.
1990


May 28-30: Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein says that oil overproduction by Kuwait and United Arab Emirates was an "economic warfare" against Iraq.
July 15: Iraq accused Kuwait of stealing oil from the Rumaylah, Iraq's oil field near the Iraqi-Kuwaiti border and warns of military action.
July 22: Iraq begins deploying troops to the Iraqi-Kuwaiti border and building a massive military buildup.
August 2: About 100,000 Iraqi troops invaded Kuwait, initiating the Gulf War. The U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 660 demanding Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait immediately and unconditionally.
August 4: Kuwait was under Iraqi control after Saddam Hussein declared a victory over Kuwait.
August 6: The U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 661 imposing a trade embargo on Iraq in a 13-0 vote, with Cuba and Yemen abstaining.
August 7: The United States launched Operation Desert Shield. First U.S. troops arrived in Saudi Arabia.
August 8: Saddam Hussein proclaimed the annexation of Kuwait.
August 12: Naval blockade of Iraq begins.
August 28: Iraq declared Kuwait as its 19th province and renames Kuwait City as al-Kadhima.
September 14: United Kingdom and France announce the deployment of troops to Saudi Arabia.
November 29: The U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 678 setting a deadline for Iraq to withdraw from Kuwait before January 15, 1991, or face military action.

1991

January 9: Talks in Geneva, Switzerland, between U.S. Secretary of State James Baker and Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz ended with no progress.
January 12 : U.S. Congress passed a joint resolution authorizing the use of military force to drive Iraq out of Kuwait. The votes were 52-47 in the U.S. Senate and 250-183 in the U.S. House of Representatives. These were the closest margins in authorizing force by the Congress since the War of 1812.
January 16: First U.S. government statement of Operation Desert Storm made.
January 17: The air war commenced at 2:38 a.m. (local time) or January 16 at 6:38 p.m. EST due to an 8 hour time difference, with an U.S. Apache helicopter attack. U.S.-led Coalition warplanes attacked Baghdad, Kuwait, and other military targets in Iraq.
January 18: Iraq launched SCUD missiles on Israel. The U.S. deploys Patriot missiles to Israel and Saudi Arabia.
January 22: Iraqi troops begins blowing up Kuwaiti oil wells.
January 25: Iraqi troops dumped millions of gallons of crude oil into the Persian Gulf.
January 29: Iraqi forces invaded the town of Khafji in Saudi Arabia. Iraqi forces were soon engaged by Saudi Arabian and Qatari troops with help from U.S. Marines.
January 30: 11 U.S. Marines in LAV's were killed in friendly fire incident by Air Force A-10 aircraft near town of Al Khafji while they were attacking a company of Iraqi tanks.
January 31: Iraqi forces captured 20 year old U.S. Army Specialist Melissa Rathbun-Nealy and Army Specialist David Lockett while driving a heavy flatbed truck near the border of Saudi Arabian-Kuwaiti border. Melissa Rathbun-Nealy was the first female U.S. Prisoner of War since World War II.
February 1: Iraqi forces were driven out of Saudi Arabia. Coalition forces won the Battle of Khafji.
February 13: An Amiriyah shelter bombing by two USAF F-117 Nighthawks killed 408 Iraqi civilians in an air raid shelter.
February 17: In an incident of friendly fire near the east-west line 5 kilometers north of the Saudi-Iraqi border, a U.S. Bradley Fighting Vehicle (Bradley) and an M113 Armored Personnel Carrier (M113) were destroyed by two Hellfire missiles fired from an U.S. Apache helicopter commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Ralph Hayles, killing two U.S. soldiers and injuring six others.
February 21: Charlie Co, 2d Light Armored Infantry Btn, 2d MAR DIV, crosses in Kuwait to scout out possible alternate breach points, identify and locate Iraqi Artillery for counter battery attack, and to draw attention away from the main forces approach points. 144 Marines hold off increasingly mounting Iraqi forces from 10:15 am on Feb 21st through 4:00am Feb 24th, using LAV-25's, LAV-TOW's and on call Artillery support from 1 Btn/10th Marines artillery and 1/3 Artillery, Tiger Bde.(2nd Armored Division)and attached Air Assets. During these three days,C Co, 2d LAI Bn sought contact and reported information on enemy troops, activities, and equipment. Operating almost continuously under antitank, rocket, and indirect fire, the battalion's companies engaged enemy troops, artillery, and tanks on at least 17 occasions the battalion accounted for numerous enemy KIA, the destruction of 12 enemy tanks, a further 35 tanks with air strikes, and the capture of 120 EPWs.
February 22: U.S. President George H. W. Bush issued a 24-hour ultimatum: Iraq must withdraw from Kuwait to avoid start of a ground war.
February 24: Ground war begins when U.S.-led Coalition forces invaded Iraq and Kuwait at around 4 a.m. Baghdad time. British Special Air Service was the first to enter Iraqi territory.
February 25: An Iraqi SCUD missile struck U.S. barracks near Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, killing 28 U.S. troops.
February 26: Saddam Hussein ordered the Iraqi withdrawal from Kuwait. About 10,000 retreating Iraqi troops were killed when Coalition aircraft bombed their stolen civilian and military vehicles. This is called the Highway of Death.
February 27: U.S. Marines and Saudi Arabian troops entered Kuwait City. U.S. Army then engaged the Iraqi Republican Guard in several tank battles in Iraq, also known as the Battle of Medina Ridge
February 28: U.S. President George H. W. Bush announced a ceasefire and that Kuwait had been liberated from Iraqi occupation.
March 1: A cease-fire plan was negotiated in Safwan, Iraq.
March 3: Iraq accepts the terms of a ceasefire from the U.N. Security Council.
March 17: First U.S. troops arrived home.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Who was the enemy in Iraq? What was the reason? Who benefited from the sham reconstruction? I heard one Dick Cheney was the president of some company that won all contracts.

America has a lot to answer on the Iraq war. It was a sham and was not necessary. The worse part is that it botched the post war scene so badly that it has no favors from Iraqis now. If the war was bad, the post war effort by the US was worse. It reminds me of India. Contracts are for just making money while no work is done.
I was thinking about this comment about America having to answer for the Iraq War, or anything else for that matter. Answer to whom, exactly? Uncle Sam goes around the world stepping on his dick all the time, and everybody complains, but he doesn't really have to answer to anybody.:truestory:

I am not really trying to be provocative, just making an observation.:pokerface:
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
I was thinking about this comment about America having to answer for the Iraq War, or anything else for that matter. Answer to whom, exactly? Uncle Sam goes around the world stepping on his dick all the time, and everybody complains, but he doesn't really have to answer to anybody.:truestory:

I am not really trying to be provocative, just making an observation.:pokerface:
Firstly the US has to answer its own people on why the nation got into a false war. Wasn't the public opinion divided? There was a Relublican bravado mainly Bush-Cheny.

The US will have to answer the world on the situation that has made the Mid East even more dangerous.

Mind you I am a staunch pro US person you will ever find in India.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Firstly the US has to answer its own people on why the nation got into a false war. Wasn't the public opinion divided? There was a Relublican bravado mainly Bush-Cheny.

The US will have to answer the world on the situation that has made the Mid East even more dangerous.

Mind you I am a staunch pro US person you will ever find in India.
Yes, there was outrage among some of the population over Bush-Cheney, Halliburton, etc for 8 years. I did not see that US policy changed because of it. The Mideast has been dangerous since at least 1948. Again, how will the US have to "answer" for that? If US policy changed because of world opinion, the US would not be trying to oust Assad today.
 

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
Billions? More like a Trillion! That entire war was a waste of money. Now you have a country aligned with Iran and Syria... wtf was GW thinking?!? Oh wait, he is a retard.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

The Messiah

Bow Before Me!
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2010
Messages
10,809
Likes
4,619
Bush was an idiot, he literally kicked iraq into the lap of iran.

Iran benefitted from the iraq war and so did private yankee companies.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Bush was an idiot, he literally kicked iraq into the lap of iran.

Iran benefitted from the iraq war and so did private yankee companies.
Private Yankee companies benefit from every war. Eisenhower made the point in 1961.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
What Bush Got Right on Iraq — and What Obama Can Learn from It | TIME.com

When George W. Bush became President in January 2001, American policy towards Iraq was in free fall and the United Nations sanctions against Saddam's regime, in place since the first Gulf War, were in tatters. By early 2003, Bush had achieved something most analysts had thought impossible: sanctions on Iraq were tighter than ever and inspectors were back in the country. Most surprising, Saddam Hussein had reportedly offered to go into exile, as long as he could take $1 billion with him.

And then Bush threw that diplomatic progress aside and committed the U.S. to a war that would cost thousands of American lives, hundreds of thousands of Iraqi ones, and more than $700 billion in American treasure. If you factor in veterans care and other costs, the price runs to the trillions. As President Obama heads down his own path to war over Iran's nuclear program, it's worth reviewing not only what Bush did wrong as he confronted Iraq ten years ago–but what he did right.
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
The lesson I learned from the Iraq War:

The Iraq war is living proof that even established democracies with long-standing strong, independent legal, judicial, political traditions, with advanced economies, and an educated populace in place - are amazingly not very different from 3rd world states; in the sense that, a single "bad dumb choice" in the top leadership of the country can literally be a disaster for the entire country and its impact felt for decades after the "bad choice" has left the scene.

Simply put - "Nothing can insulate you or your country from just one dumb President or Prime Minister"

The "Iraq War" in my humble opinion was probably the dumbest most idiotic war ever waged in the current and last century.
The tab for this war is not billions......but well over a Trillion USD. Hundreds of Thousands of lives destroyed !!!
The results - Iraq today is incredibly a bigger mess than when Saddam and his goons ran it.

BE CAREFUL WHO YOU VOTE FOR !!!
 
Last edited:

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Simply put - "Nothing can insulate you or your country from just one dumb President or Prime Minister"
The myth persists among the perennial sophomores. Do yourself a favor and look and the congressional votes on the war so you can finally emerge from your ignorance,

Iraq Resolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The melodramatic posturing on DFI can be at times quite tedious.
 

mattster

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 30, 2009
Messages
1,171
Likes
870
Country flag
The myth persists among the perennial sophomores. Do yourself a favor and look and the congressional votes on the war so you can finally emerge from your ignorance,

Iraq Resolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The melodramatic posturing on DFI can be at times quite tedious.

I was fully aware of the fact that a big majority in congress voted in favor of the war(both Democrats and Republicans) when i first responded to this thread.

The fact remains that Bush and his senior team cherry-picked every once of intelligence to support this war.
They came up with some of the craziest stories to get people on their side.

Congress is nothing but a bunch of sheep when it comes to authorizing a war/military action.
The President leads and Congress follows. Did you really expect congress to block a US President from going to war ?
Who is the sophomore here - me or you ??

But the ultimate responsibility lies with Bush and his national security team.
 
Last edited:

linjooo

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2013
Messages
8
Likes
1
American voted Bush to be the president,so they should take the responsibility. Now it is not to time to blame bush, but to rethink of what they done. For the last decades, US messed up everything, e.g creating enemy around the world, quantitative Easing, drone strike. They thought they freed people in Iraq, but they never ask what the normal Iraq residents say. I saw a new that Obama promise not to use drone attack for US citizen. Can Obama also make a promise not to use it for other countries ,at least for US allies. I really don't think so.
 

W.G.Ewald

Defence Professionals/ DFI member of 2
Professional
Joined
Sep 28, 2011
Messages
14,139
Likes
8,594
Even with hindsight the Iraq war was the best option for all concerned

Let me be blunt; I think we were right to play our own small part in the destruction of the regime of Saddam Hussein. It was a far from perfect operation, mistakes were made and the sectarian violence which followed was appalling. But there are three reasons why the world is better off for the demise of the Hussein regime.

The first is simple humanity. Hussein's regime was one of extreme brutality. He murdered thousands of his people - Shiites and Kurds - to consolidate his dictatorial hold on power. He used chemical weapons against his own people.

For many, foreign policy realism meant accepting appalling human rights abuses, particularly in the Arab world. Realists argue the international community has no right to decide how individual countries are governed; I don't accept that. Sovereignty is important but not more important than humanity. It has always made sense to me that if freedoms are oppressed with egregious cruelty, then the world should not stand by and ignore it.

I supported the NATO campaign in 1997 against the Serbian dictator Slobodan Milosevic;I set up the human rights dialogue with China; I was an early champion of the International Criminal Court; and I championed the overthrow of the brutal regime of Hussein.
Advertisement

Plenty of critics argued 10 years ago that to contain Saddam was enough. Well, it wasn't if you were an Iraqi Shiite or a Kurd. Which, by the way, is most Iraqis.

The destruction of Saddam Hussein's regime began a slow, rickety, imperfect process of spreading democracy and freedom through the Arab world. Lebanon held democratic elections, Jordan liberalised, albeit under a monarchy, the Palestinians began the march towards democracy and, more recently, we've seen the so-called Arab Spring.

These democratic reforms, including in Iraq, have been imperfect to say the least. There is still a long way to go. But the fashion for kleptocratic dictatorship in the Arab world, led by Nasser in Egypt in the 1950s, has gradually passed.

Second, there is the issue of chemical and biological weapons. These days it's fashionable to proclaim Hussein didn't have any. The whole issue of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction arose not because poor old Saddam was some benign and misunderstood gentleman, but because he did have these weapons and he used them. He used them against the Iranians in the Iran/Iraq war which he started.

After the Iraq war, the unit charged with the task of finding Hussein's stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons - known as the Iraq Survey Group - found none. The assumption is that the regime had destroyed its stockpiles sometime between 1992 and 2003. That remains an unanswered question. The UN inspectors were never happy this had happened. Nor were Western and Israeli intelligence agencies.

But what the Iraq Survey Group did find was that Hussein planned to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction programs once the UN inspection team had been sent packing. Had that happened, the Middle East would have been a much more dangerous place than it already is.

Which brings me to the third point; geopolitics. More than two decades ago an international coalition went to war with Hussein's regime to drive the Iraqi army out of Kuwait. Hussein's ambition was clear. He wanted to become the dominant political figure of the Arab world and he was prepared to go to war with his neighbours to gain that status.

It is one thing to complain we evicted him by force from office, but what would have been the consequence of leaving this deeply anti-Western dictator in power? Iraq would have increasingly become a threat to Israel, to its neighbours and to Western interests.

None of this is to say the Americans did a great job after the Iraqi regime was defeated. They shouldn't have taken over political control of the country, destroyed the Iraqi army or pursued the de-Baathification program with such vigour. We - and the British - made those arguments at the time. So did a lot of Iraqis.

And it is true, the sectarian conflict which followed was brutal and it still goes on.

But if the threshold question is, should we have played a part in getting rid of Saddam Hussein a decade ago, my answer is an unequivocal yes. We played a small part in evicting the world's most brutal dictator who made President Assad of Syria look moderate. We played a tiny part in starting to change theologies of the Middle East from dictatorship to democracy. And we helped spare the region and the world from a dictator who aspired to dominate the Arab world and threaten Israel.

That was the thing about the Howard government: we stood for something. And one of the things we stood for was freedom.
Alexander Downer was foreign minister from 1996 to 2007.

Alexander John Downer, AC (born 9 September 1951) is a former Australian Liberal Party politician who was Foreign Minister of Australia from 11 March 1996 to 3 December 2007, the longest-serving in Australian history. He was also the Leader of the Opposition for eight months from 1994 to 1995. Downer is currently the United Nations Special Adviser to the Secretary-General on Cyprus.
Alexander Downer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top