The errors of Simla

Discussion in 'Defence & Strategic Issues' started by A.V., Mar 24, 2009.

  1. A.V.

    A.V. New Member

    Feb 16, 2009
    Likes Received:
    Moscow, russia
    In the Kargil conflict of 1999, we unilaterally declared that we would not cross the LoC.

    The argument that India's restraint won it global support holds no water. The West (meaning the hyperpower, the United States) changed its stance not because the justice of the Indian case on Kashmir had suddenly dawned on it, but because it was a part of its re-assessment of the world in the post Cold War era.

    By our lack of understanding and timidity, we have now established a 'rule of the game' that while Pakistan can cross the LoC we will not, even when it is tactically unsound. Thus, the duo of then prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee and then defence minister George Fernandes [Images] forced our soldiers to adopt virtually suicidal tactics to re-capture the Kargil heights.

    Lack of geo-political vision

    India never understood the vital strategic importance of the Northern Areas of Kashmir (comprising Gilgit and Hunza). This is an area where India, China and Central Asia meet.

    The British, well schooled in the art, engineered a revolt in Gilgit (led by Major Brown and Captain Matheson) and unfurled the Pakistani flag there on November 3, 1947. Lieutenant Colonel Sher Jung Thapa then defended the Skardu fort for nearly eight months. But without ammunition and supplies, he finally surrendered on August 14, 1948.

    Major Brown's action were not in isolation. A year earlier, a freelance explorer, Sir Francis Tillman, had undertaken the arduous trek from Urumachi in Chinese Sinkiang to Chitral. Right from the early days Britain saw Pakistan as an imperial outpost of the West in Asia (V K Krishna Menon in Michael Breacher's Krishna Menon's View of the World).

    In 1971, we had a golden opportunity to concentrate our military efforts in the direction of Northern Areas, if the military was told in advance about the intention to keep territory captured in Kashmir.

    It appears that no such directive was given and retention of land captured in Kashmir was an afterthought at Simla. The success achieved in capturing Turtuk and various peaks in the Partapur sector was a 'freelance' operation by the great Colonel Rinchan, almost a solo effort.
  3. Yusuf

    Yusuf GUARDIAN Administrator

    Mar 24, 2009
    Likes Received:
    The biggest error of Simla was the return of captured land.
  4. ajtr

    ajtr Veteran Member Veteran Member

    Oct 2, 2009
    Likes Received:
    no i dont think so .we did kept kargil after 1971.biggest mistake was not persecuting pakistan army for it genocide crime in bangladesh.
  5. truthfull

    truthfull Regular Member

    Oct 27, 2009
    Likes Received:
    i think biggest error in 1971 was giving of land and falsely falling in trap of zulfi alikar bhutto..At that time our politicians have followed a same policy for not consulting army.For them army can do nothing ion such matters.
  6. anoop_mig25

    anoop_mig25 Senior Member Senior Member

    Aug 17, 2009
    Likes Received:
    i can only say our politicians as well as policy maker do not have foresight or else how can u explain PM NEHRU going to UN when our army was wining the war (as claimed by indian sources).And i do not think any future GOI would be able to take the captured land back. i have feeling that they might loose Kashmir in some form of autonomy to kahmir.

Share This Page