HariPrasad-1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 9,621
- Likes
- 21,088
You gave me the citation of air power Australia but it does not prove your point at all.J-20 has canards. The F-22 has even bigger wings.
I gave you a citation from Australia Air Power. That's not a Chinese source.
----------
The J-20 DSI is a good qualitative argument that the J-20 has better RCS than the F-22.
"I would say that the J-20 has a superior RCS, it has better planform alignment, canted weapons bays, DSI inlets, its overall frontal stealth appearance is very similar to the F-22 and F-35."
Source: http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=25664
This is your citation:
"Modelling has determined, that if the production J-20 retains the axisymmetric nozzles and smoothly area ruled sides, the aircraft could at best deliver robust Very Low Observable performance in the nose aspect angular sector."
It talks about low serviceability (Yes not stealth) of nose aspect angular sector and not J 20. So your citation prove opposite to what you want to prove.