26/11 Mumbai attacks: Trial and related developments

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
The more sinister game is going on.There are two groups in indian govt.one Group of GoI led by PM manmohan singh and external affairs ministry who is hand in glove with usa and pakistan wanted Headley's revelation about ISI involvement to remain hidden from Indian public in order to avoid further pressure upon themselves to take action. Another section led by Home Ministry thought it should be out in the open and the pressure should be on Pakistan as the following reports suggests.

At home, a change of voice

The additional secretary (Naxalite management) will interact with the media from now, apparently in the wake of a directive to the home ministry to restructure the current mechanism.

The directive could be interpreted as an indirect gag order on the Union home ministry, which, the foreign policy establishment felt, was stepping into its turf. The latest flashpoint was Union home secretary G.K. Pillai's comments on the eve of the foreign minister-level talks in Islamabad, which gave Pakistan an opportunity to sling barbs.

Such a directive to the home ministry can normally be issued only by the Prime Minister's Office. It was known that the foreign policy establishment, responsible for implementing Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's peace initiative, was not happy with the timing of Pillai's remarks, although some feel the home secretary would not have made the comments unilaterally.

...
...
The usually forthcoming Pillai was reticent today. He directed questions from journalists to D.R.S. Chaudhary, the designated official. Considered media-shy, Chaudhary replaces additional director-general (media) Onkar Kedia, who is on leave now.

Singh issues gag orders against home secretary

* Indian PM unhappy with Pillai for issuing statement against ISI

By Iftikhar Gilani

NEW DELHI: Upset at Home Secretary GK Pillai's statements that many believe torpedoed the Pak-India talks, Indian Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh on Tuesday issued a gag order against all Home Ministry officials.

The officials have been barred from speaking to the media except through the ministry's authorised spokesman.

Dilip Raj Singh Chaudhry, the in-charge of Naxal affairs, has been designated as the Home Ministry's new spokesman. The Indian media has been asked to contact Chaudhry to obtain any official comments from the ministry.

Sources in the Indian PM's office said that restrictions had been placed as Pillai's remarks had created many difficulties for the government. The latest being his comment on the role of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in the 26/11 attacks. The remarks came just before Indian External Affairs Minister SM Krishna was to visit Islamabad for talks with his counterpart.

The sources said that at a meeting with the Indian PM, Krishna had expressed anguish at Pillai's surprise comments. "PM Singh took this seriously and decided to let the Home Ministry better interact with the media through the official spokesman," the sources said.

The source said Home Minister P Chidambaram was consulted before issuing the gag order. The sources said Singh was also 'unhappy' about the disparaging comments made by Pillai against the People's Democratic Party (PDP).
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Saeed, Lakhvi part of larger conspiracy: NIA


JIBY KATTAKAYAM
SHARE · PRINT · T+
The National Investigation Agency (NIA), seeking in a Delhi court non-bailable warrant (NBW) against Jama-ut-Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed, Lashkar-e-Taiba head of operations Zaki-ur-Rahman Lakhvi and four other Pakistani citizens, said its case was based on a "larger conspiracy" against India.

To District and Sessions Judge S.P. Garg's poser on the need for warrants against Saeed and Lakhvi, against whom a Mumbai trial court hearing the 26/11 terror attack case had issued NBWs in June 2009, NIA counsel Dayan Krishnan said the agency's investigation was "separate" and it had evidence to show that the duo was part of a larger conspiracy against the country and that the 26/11 terror attack was just one part of it.

NIA counsel also briefed the court that the NBW would help the agency approach Interpol for a "United Nations Security Council Interpol Special Notice" against Saeed and Lakhvi besides the Red Corner Notice. This special notice is issued for groups and individuals who are the targets of U.N. sanctions against the Al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

The NIA submitted before the court a consolidated list of designated individuals and entities associated with the Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, which was created through Resolution 1267 of the U.N. Security Council in 1999, against whom sanctions were imposed.

Counsel pointed out to the court that Saeed was serial number 263.08 and Lakhvi was 264.08 in the "consolidated list" and this would enable the NIA to ask Interpol to issue the "Special Notice" against them. Both their names made it to the U.N. list in December 2008.

Mr. Krishnan pleaded that the issuing of an NBW would help to name Saeed and Lakhvi as "proclaimed offenders" under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in the long run.

The court will decide on the application on Wednesday.

Last week, the NIA withdrew the NBW applications filed on March 22, 2010, in the same court for David Coleman Headley and Tahawwur Hussain Rana after a NIA team physically verified that the duo were in U.S. custody and submitted that non-bailable warrants against the duo were now redundant.

Saeed, Lakhvi and the four others, who include two Pakistani army officers, have been charged under the Indian Penal Code, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the SAARC Convention (Suppression of Terrorism) Act for waging war against the Indian government, conspiracy and procuring arms and ammunition.
 

EagleOne

Regular Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
886
Likes
87
so does it mean after taliban isi and pak amry will be targeted ???
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
so does it mean after taliban isi and pak amry will be targeted ???
No it mean that GOI is want to swept Mumbai details under carpet and want to hide usa/pak perfidy from indian public so that indian public dont force GOI to take strong actions and GOI keep making love to usa and pakistan without indiant public interference.Thats the only reason home secretary G.K.pillai got reprimanded and gaged.Today the truth is that GOI dont want to call spade a spade
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
How eager usa is to protect its client isi and PA

US on Headley issue: Expect India to live up to responsibility


WASHINGTON/CHICAGO: With Indian officials going public with what LeT operative David Headley had told investigators, the US on Thursday said it fully expects "both countries to live up to their respective responsibilities".

Amid reports that the Obama administration was upset over Indian officials going into the details provided by Headley, state department spokesman P J Crowley said the US values cooperation with India on combating terrorism but it places responsibility on both countries.

"We fully expect both countries to live up to their respective responsibilities," Crowley told reporters at his daily news conference.

Crowley was responding to a question about an Indian media report that stated that the US is upset about the statements coming out from senior Indian officials, revealing details of information the Mumbai terror suspect provided to Indian interrogators recently.

At the conclusion of the questioning of Headley by Indian investigators on June 10, the US justice department had said: "To protect the confidentiality of the investigations being conducted by both India and the US, both countries have agreed not to disclose the contents of the interviews".

American officials have reportedly expressed concern that public discussions on Headley could adversely affect the case against him in the United States.

"We value the cooperation between India and the United States on law enforcement and combating terrorism; it's important. It does place responsibilities on both countries," Crowley said.

Union home secretary G K Pillai had disclosed last week that Headley had confirmed that Pakistan's ISI was involved with 26/11 "from beginning to end".

This was followed by National Security Advisor Shivshankar Menon speaking on "the links between the official establishment and existing intelligence agencies" in Pakistan as revealed by Headley.

"If anything, it is getting stronger," Menon had said. Crowley said the US is aware about such statements but restrained from responding in detail.

"I'm just going to simply say that our cooperation is significant. It is a vital dimension of our relationship. It's important for both sides. In this cooperation there are responsibilities that we both have, and I'll leave it there".

The department of justice refused to make any comment on the issue. "No comments," a DOJ spokesman said when asked about the reports.

Meanwhile in Chicago, Headley's lawyer John Theis also refused to comment on any of the substance of the meetings that he had with Indian authorities here when they came to interrogate Headley.

The National Investigation Agency team had come here from India in the first week of June to question Headley over the Mumbai attack plot.

Sources said they had learnt that sometimes in the Indian press, things are not reported entirely accurately.
 

EagleOne

Regular Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
886
Likes
87
US worried about another 26/11 type attack on India

The United States has expressed fears of yet another Mumbai type attack on India aimed at igniting a war with Pakistan.
Talking to media-persons on his special aircraft en route to New Delhi , United States Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen , while praising India for showing restraint after the ghastly 26/11 attacks, said extremists may try to repeat the incident that left 166 dead and over 300 injured.

I've worried a great deal about a repeat attack, of something like that, The Dawn newspaper quoted Mullen as saying.

Mullen stressed that he along with the Obama administration is focussed on making sure "this doesn't happen again".

He pointed out that the Mumbai terror attacks showed how a handful of militants could have a "strategic impact" and bring two nuclear-powered nations on the threshold of a full-scale military conflict.

"One of the things that struck me then and is still of great concern is that those terrorists could bring two countries closer (to possible conflict). It didn't bring them to the brink (of war) but it brought them closer," Mullen said.

Responding to a question over India's stand that Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence had provided support to the Mumbai attackers, Mullen said after the incident he had conveyed his "grave concern" to that country, including the ISI leadership.

Mullen also acknowledged that the Obama administration has certain 'disagreements' with the ISI over its alleged links with militant organisations fighting against the US led allied forces in Afghanistan.

"The United States sometimes seeks "certain clarifications" from the ISI "on why certain things are done," the top US military official said.

Mullen is likely to visit Islamabad also following his two-day tour to India.



http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/...-about-another-26-11-type-attack-on-india.htm
http://www.news24.com/World/News/US-fears-2nd-India-attack-20100722
http://www.zeenews.com/news642890.html
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...nother-26/11-on-India/articleshow/6201626.cms
 
Last edited:

Pintu

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
12,082
Likes
348
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...nother-26/11-on-India/articleshow/6201626.cms

US military chief fears another 26/11 on India
IANS, Jul 22, 2010, 06.47pm IST

WASHINGTON: The US' top military official fears a possible repeat of a Mumbai type terror attack on India by Pakistan based terror outfits to provoke another conflict between the two nuclear armed nations.

"One of the things that struck me then, and is still a great concern, is how 10 terrorists could drive two nuclear-armed nations closer to conflict," Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen told reporters travelling with him on his way to India.

"There is the possibility of some kind of miscalculation in response to an attack such as the one in Mumbai," he said, adding he was particularly concerned about the Laskar-e Taiba (LeT) terror group blamed for the November 2008 Mumbai attack.

"I see them starting to emerge as a larger, regional, global threat," Mullen was quoted as saying by the US Defence Department.

"One of the things I've watched in the FATA, in the region between Pakistan and in Afghanistan, is the merging of these terrorist organizations," he said.

Mullen, who was in New Delhi a few days after the terror attack in Mumbai, said he was impressed by Indian restraint during and immediately after the attack.

Counter-terrorism will be the main discussion with Indian leaders, Mullen said. "The United States and India have shared interests that are tied specifically to counter-terrorism," he said. "We've both been attacked and lost precious citizens."

Working together to blunt and to end the terrorist threat is one impetus to working together. Indian military leaders "are also very focused on how we share what we have learned," the chairman said.

The military-to-military relationship between the US and India has grown dramatically in the past 20 years, Mullen said and he wants to keep the process on track.

Mullen will follow his visit to India with one to Pakistan as the US has military-to-military contacts with both countries.

While the US military is not a bridge between the two nations, "it is important that we remain engaged," Mullen said. "Certainly there is an opportunity to have discussions across the region and we will work our way through to a much more stable future."
 

Pintu

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
12,082
Likes
348
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...s-Taliban-al-Qaida-US/articleshow/6200056.cms

LeT as dangerous as Taliban, al-Qaida: US
PTI, Jul 22, 2010, 12.35pm IST

NEW DELHI: The US on Thursday said Lashkar-e-Taiba terror outfit was as dangerous as Taliban and al-Qaida with which it was working in close coordination and that Pakistan has been asked to deny it a foothold in that country.

US special envoy on Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke also emphasised the urgent need for bringing to justice the perpetrators of Mumbai attacks, saying Pakistan has taken "some steps" in this regard but these were not enough.

Holbrooke, who met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh here last evening to give his assessment of the situation in Afghanistan, said India has a "vitally important role" to play in the peace and stability in that country and insisted that the US was not trying to "diminish" that scope.

At the same time, he emphasised that Afghanistan cannot be stabilised without the participation of Pakistan, which has "legitimate concerns" in that country.

In an interaction with a group of journalists here, he said the LeT's goal was to create "maximum problems" between India and Pakistan besides working against the interests of western countries.

"When we talk about major terrorist groups we consider it as dangerous as other groups," Holbrooke said when suggested that the US did not appear to be keen on tackling LeT on the same lines as Taliban and al-Qaida.

"We understand, as government, that it (LeT) is a threat and we talk about it all the time with Pakistani military (asking them) to deny their territory to this organisation," said Holbrooke, who arrived here yesterday after a visit to Islamabad.

The special envoy said, "We all know what it (LeT) did and what they want to do."

He identified LeT as a part of terror conglomerate comprising Afghan Taliban, Pakistani Taliban and Haqqani network. "Taliban has almost become a brand," he observed.

"Under intense pressure these groups seem to be growing closer to each other. Two or three years ago, they were more distinct than now," Holbrooke said.

He said these groups work more closely and help each other as their long-term objective is similar - to hurt western ideologies and create "maximum problems between India and Pakistan.

"Tackling it (LeT) is equal to any other priority in the region," he said.

To a question on Mumbai attacks, he said Pakistan has taken "some steps but these are not enough". He said the US was talking "frankly" to Pakistan on such issues.

Holbrooke, who attended the Kabul Conference on Tuesday, said the US recognises that Afghanistan's "neighbours and near neighbours have genuine security concerns" in that country and "that includes definitely India."

To a question about worries here that India's stakes and role were not being appreciated by the US, he insisted that "nobody wants to diminish India in Afghanistan."

The US envoy, who also met National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon, said "India has a vitally important role to play" in Afghanistan. He, however, refused to define that role saying it was for the Indian leadership to do so.

At the same time, he added that there was no "zero sum game" between India and Pakistan.

He sought to allay apprehensions here that Pakistan would be taking control of Afghanistan after the US-led forces leave the country.

"Pakistan is not going to take over Afghanistan nor is Taliban. But every country in the region has to be part of the solution," he underlined.

But, he added, "you cannot stabilise (Afghanistan) without the participation of Pakistan which has legitimate concerns."

Holbrooke said Taliban poses a "formidable threat to security and stability of Afghanistan and the region."

He also sought to allay concerns here over the US' efforts to develop relations with Pakistan.

"Improved (US) relations with Pakistan is not bad for India and improved (US) relations with India is not bad for Pakistan," he said, while pointing out that he hears worries on this count every time he visits Islamabad or here.

"The truth is that America has closer relations with India and closer relations with Pakistan than you two countries have with each other," he said.

He said the US firmly believes that its improved relations with Pakistan and India are in interest of both the countries. "So, that is the reason we have strategic dialogue, to improve relations with Pakistan."

On the recent trade and transit pact signed between Afghanistan and Pakistan, he said it was the "most important" agreement reached in 50 years and was better than the 1965 pact between Afghanistan, Pakistan and India which was "outmoded and disregarded".

This agreement does not include India but it does allow Afghan trucks to come up to Wagah crossing on Indian border and offload goods directly to Indian trucks, he said, terming this as a "big step" for Afghan-India relations.

"I hope it is just the beginning of more such steps," he said.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...nother-26/11-on-India/articleshow/6201626.cms

US military chief fears another 26/11 on India
IANS, Jul 22, 2010, 06.47pm IST

WASHINGTON: The US' top military official fears a possible repeat of a Mumbai type terror attack on India by Pakistan based terror outfits to provoke another conflict between the two nuclear armed nations.

"One of the things that struck me then, and is still a great concern, is how 10 terrorists could drive two nuclear-armed nations closer to conflict," Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen told reporters travelling with him on his way to India.

"There is the possibility of some kind of miscalculation in response to an attack such as the one in Mumbai," he said, adding he was particularly concerned about the Laskar-e Taiba (LeT) terror group blamed for the November 2008 Mumbai attack.

"I see them starting to emerge as a larger, regional, global threat," Mullen was quoted as saying by the US Defence Department.

"One of the things I've watched in the FATA, in the region between Pakistan and in Afghanistan, is the merging of these terrorist organizations," he said.

Mullen, who was in New Delhi a few days after the terror attack in Mumbai, said he was impressed by Indian restraint during and immediately after the attack.

Counter-terrorism will be the main discussion with Indian leaders, Mullen said. "The United States and India have shared interests that are tied specifically to counter-terrorism," he said. "We've both been attacked and lost precious citizens."

Working together to blunt and to end the terrorist threat is one impetus to working together. Indian military leaders "are also very focused on how we share what we have learned," the chairman said.

The military-to-military relationship between the US and India has grown dramatically in the past 20 years, Mullen said and he wants to keep the process on track.

Mullen will follow his visit to India with one to Pakistan as the US has military-to-military contacts with both countries.

While the US military is not a bridge between the two nations, "it is important that we remain engaged," Mullen said. "Certainly there is an opportunity to have discussions across the region and we will work our way through to a much more stable future."
How coolly USA peddles lies.Sadly indian govt and intelligentsia believe any lies usa sprouts.USA dont want to name PA and ISI as the direct offender in 9/11 and 26/11 thus pulling wool over the eyes of both gullible american and indian public.Sorry but usa and india interests on counter-terrorism dont converge rather they diverge.USA wants to protect thet perpetrator of terror Pak army and isi and india wants to destroy it.

Before dealing with PA/ISI india has to deal with usa and throw spanner in usa war on terror.it must bee seen that usa interests in IOR and middle east be disturbed by seeking alliance with iran.
1
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...s-Taliban-al-Qaida-US/articleshow/6200056.cms

LeT as dangerous as Taliban, al-Qaida: US
PTI, Jul 22, 2010, 12.35pm IST

NEW DELHI: The US on Thursday said Lashkar-e-Taiba terror outfit was as dangerous as Taliban and al-Qaida with which it was working in close coordination and that Pakistan has been asked to deny it a foothold in that country.

US special envoy on Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke also emphasised the urgent need for bringing to justice the perpetrators of Mumbai attacks, saying Pakistan has taken "some steps" in this regard but these were not enough.

Holbrooke, who met Prime Minister Manmohan Singh here last evening to give his assessment of the situation in Afghanistan, said India has a "vitally important role" to play in the peace and stability in that country and insisted that the US was not trying to "diminish" that scope.

At the same time, he emphasised that Afghanistan cannot be stabilised without the participation of Pakistan, which has "legitimate concerns" in that country.

In an interaction with a group of journalists here, he said the LeT's goal was to create "maximum problems" between India and Pakistan besides working against the interests of western countries.

"When we talk about major terrorist groups we consider it as dangerous as other groups," Holbrooke said when suggested that the US did not appear to be keen on tackling LeT on the same lines as Taliban and al-Qaida.

"We understand, as government, that it (LeT) is a threat and we talk about it all the time with Pakistani military (asking them) to deny their territory to this organisation," said Holbrooke, who arrived here yesterday after a visit to Islamabad.

The special envoy said, "We all know what it (LeT) did and what they want to do."

He identified LeT as a part of terror conglomerate comprising Afghan Taliban, Pakistani Taliban and Haqqani network. "Taliban has almost become a brand," he observed.

"Under intense pressure these groups seem to be growing closer to each other. Two or three years ago, they were more distinct than now," Holbrooke said.

He said these groups work more closely and help each other as their long-term objective is similar - to hurt western ideologies and create "maximum problems between India and Pakistan.

"Tackling it (LeT) is equal to any other priority in the region," he said.

To a question on Mumbai attacks, he said Pakistan has taken "some steps but these are not enough". He said the US was talking "frankly" to Pakistan on such issues.

Holbrooke, who attended the Kabul Conference on Tuesday, said the US recognises that Afghanistan's "neighbours and near neighbours have genuine security concerns" in that country and "that includes definitely India."

To a question about worries here that India's stakes and role were not being appreciated by the US, he insisted that "nobody wants to diminish India in Afghanistan."

The US envoy, who also met National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon, said "India has a vitally important role to play" in Afghanistan. He, however, refused to define that role saying it was for the Indian leadership to do so.

At the same time, he added that there was no "zero sum game" between India and Pakistan.

He sought to allay apprehensions here that Pakistan would be taking control of Afghanistan after the US-led forces leave the country.

"Pakistan is not going to take over Afghanistan nor is Taliban. But every country in the region has to be part of the solution," he underlined.

But, he added, "you cannot stabilise (Afghanistan) without the participation of Pakistan which has legitimate concerns."

Holbrooke said Taliban poses a "formidable threat to security and stability of Afghanistan and the region."

He also sought to allay concerns here over the US' efforts to develop relations with Pakistan.

"Improved (US) relations with Pakistan is not bad for India and improved (US) relations with India is not bad for Pakistan," he said, while pointing out that he hears worries on this count every time he visits Islamabad or here.

"The truth is that America has closer relations with India and closer relations with Pakistan than you two countries have with each other," he said.

He said the US firmly believes that its improved relations with Pakistan and India are in interest of both the countries. "So, that is the reason we have strategic dialogue, to improve relations with Pakistan."

On the recent trade and transit pact signed between Afghanistan and Pakistan, he said it was the "most important" agreement reached in 50 years and was better than the 1965 pact between Afghanistan, Pakistan and India which was "outmoded and disregarded".

This agreement does not include India but it does allow Afghan trucks to come up to Wagah crossing on Indian border and offload goods directly to Indian trucks, he said, terming this as a "big step" for Afghan-India relations.

"I hope it is just the beginning of more such steps," he said.
Improved relations between usa and pak can benificiary to both but usa-india relation are not beneficiary to india.usa seek a compliant bannana republic in india like pakistan.GOI ,if it has some foresight will keep usa at arms length.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
USA selling snake oil to india.....It dont want to name PA/ISI as perpetrators instead it iss actively protecting it.Its same like As Nixon/Kissinger combine try to sweep bengali genocide in 1971 by pak army in east pakistan to save Yahya khan's skin.Like wise obama and his coterie Hollbrooke doing the same.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Thank god to chidambram otherwise south block is full of incompetent ministers.They would have another S-e-S this time.

'CCS was briefed on Headley interrogation'


Contrary to reports that the Home Ministry did not keep the External Affairs Ministry informed of the details of interrogation of Lashkar operative David Coleman Headley, government sources on Thursday sought to put the record straight, pointing out that the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) had been briefed on the issue by Home Minister P. Chidambaram in the presence of External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna.

Even as the blame game between the two key Ministries for the 'unsuccessful' India-Pakistan Foreign Minister-level talks began with Mr. Krishna taking exception to Home Secretary G.K. Pillai's statement on the disclosures made by Headley that allegedly impacted the atmosphere during the talks, the Home Ministry is learnt to be making a move to hold discussions with the External Affairs Ministry to iron out their 'differences.'

The sources pointed out that before visiting Pakistan for the SAARC Interior Ministers' conference in June, Mr. Chidambaram had given details of Headley's interrogation by a National Investigation Agency (NIA) team. They said copies of the interrogation report were provided to all concerned, including National Security Adviser Shivshankar Menon.

India's High Commissioner to Pakistan and a 'note taker' from the Indian mission were also present at all but one of the meetings the Indian delegation had with Pakistan when Mr. Chidambaram visited Islamabad last month.

'PRIVY TO INFORMATION'

"Except the one-on-one meeting between Home Minister Chidambaram and Pakistan's Interior Minister Rehman Malik, in all the other meetings the High Commissioner and a 'note taker' from the mission were present. So they are privy to all information that the delegation discussed with Pakistan," the sources said.

The sources said the India-Pakistan talks last week were not headed anywhere because the Pakistani Army establishment did not want them to succeed, and engineered "some developments" at the last minute.

They pointed out that Mr. Krishna and his counterpart, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, were reported to have made considerable progress during their first session that went on for nearly five hours, the two Ministers even having had a working lunch.

However, Mr. Krishna's schedule to call on Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani was reversed at the last minute and he first called on President Asif Ali Zardari. In the meantime, Army chief General Kayani met Mr. Gilani and when the talks resumed after Mr. Krishna's two call-ons, the complexion, tone and atmosphere changed. Pakistan adopted a hawkish posture of adhering to a timeline on settling outstanding issues, including Kashmir, which ultimately led to the stalling of talks.

Though the Indian delegation showed flexibility in its approach, the Pakistani side appeared to be having different designs, the sources said.

While completely discounting rumours of the Home Secretary planning to resign in protest against his name being unnecessarily dragged into the controversy, sources in the North Block said the Home Ministry would take up discussions with the External Affairs Ministry and sort out "differences" in their perceptions on certain key issues.

The sources believed that Mr. Pillai was being made a "scapegoat" by certain vested interests. "Many other persons in the government had made a similar statement at different times regarding disclosures made by Headley during his questioning by the NIA team," the sources added.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Home Min strikes back at MEA
Civil war in Govt over security issues​


External Affairs Minister SM Krishna may be holding Home Secretary GK Pillai responsible for the failure of Foreign Minister-level talks with Pakistan, but the fact remains that the dialogue collapsed due to Pakistan's insistence on broad basing the agenda of engagement, removing the focus away from the key issue of terror, and arm-twisting India to agree to resume the stalled composite dialogue process.

The revelations made by a senior Government official on Thursday clearly highlight the sharp differences between the Home Ministry and External Affairs Ministry on sensitive issues concerning national security. In fact, the UPA Government seemed to be badly divided on handling of both the internal security (Maoist problem) and external threat from Pakistan-based terror groups.

The Home Ministry's tough posturing on refusal of Pakistan to act against Mumbai terror attack mastermind Hafiz Saeed has clearly not gone down well with the higher-ups in the Government and MEA, who want to somehow resume the dialogue process with Pakistan at any cost.

The Home Ministry and the Union Government, or at least an influential section of it, are also at loggerheads over the course of action needed to deal with Maoists. Exasperated over criticism by his partymen, especially frontal attack by Congress general secretary Digvijay Singh, on the handling of the Maoist problem, Home Minister Chidambaram on Thursday went to the extent of virtually offering to step down.

"He (Singh) is the general secretary of our party. I have a job to do and I am doing my job to the best of my ability. If someone can do the job better, I would be the happiest person," he told a business newspaper.

Singh, who last week justified what he had written about Chidambaram's handling of the Maoist problem and claimed that it reflected the party policy, remained defiant and said on Thursday that he had not overstepped the line in sticking to his stance on anti-Naxal policy.

Meanwhile, the blame game between the Ministries of External Affairs and Home regarding the failed talks with Pakistan took a new turn with new revelation that Krishna was briefed about David Headley's revelations on the ISI role in 26/11 attacks in the Cabinet Committee on Security before he left for Islamabad for talks.

Krishna on Wednesday said his Ministry was not informed about the details of Headley's revelations on the ISI role. He also criticised Home Secretary GK Pillai for speaking out of turn about the ISI on the eve of the talks thereby shifting the focus from parleys to Pillai's statement.

Denying Krishna's assertions, sources said here on Thursday that the Minister was apprised about the facts on the ISI by Chidambaram in the CCS a day before he left for Islamabad. Sources also pointed out that the LeT operator was interrogated in Chicago in presence of Indian Mission officials there. The NIA investigators also informed the US Ambassador about the details of the interrogation.

"Moreover, the Indian High Commissioner in Pakistan was aware of Headley revelations during the talks between Chidambaram and Interior Minister of Pakistan in June. The copy of all the dossiers the Home Minister handed over to Pakistan is with the India's High Commissioner in Pakistan," said sources.

"The Home Minister also apprised the Prime Minister and NSA about the details of the ISI role, revealed by Headley," said sources.

Incidentally, as soon as Krishna landed in Islamabad on July 14 for talks with his Pakistani counterpart Shah Mahmood Qureshi, he said he expected to discuss core concern of terrorism in the context of Headley's interrogation in connection with Mumbai terror attacks.

As per the information sourced, Indo-Pak talks collapsed on June 15 afternoon, after the Pakistan Army wanted to shift the focus away from terror to Kashmir, Siachen and Sir Creek issues. The observers feel that the tone of the Indo-Pak talks changed after Pakistan Army chief Asfaq Parvez Kayani's meeting with Prime Minister Yusaf Raza Geelani and President Asif Ali Zardari.

"From afternoon of July 15 onwards everything changed. Pakistan pressed for resumption of composite dialogue and demanded time limits for settling contentious issues. Fixed plans on signing MoUs and creation of Joint Working Groups on LoC trades and water disputes collapsed after the Pakistan Army put pressure on their officials," said sources.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
MHA, MEA stand divided over Pak


PTI | New Delhi

In the wake of External Affairs Minister SM Krishna's criticism of Home Secretary GK Pillai, questions have cropped up whether the two ministries were at loggerheads over Pakistan.

Wading into the row, BJP said there were "palpable differences" between the two Ministries and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was keeping quiet on the issue.

Close on the heels of reports that the MEA was kept in the dark on interrogation details of Pakistani-American LeT operative David Headley, Home Ministry sources rubbished these as untrue.

They said Home Minister P Chidambaram had briefed the Cabinet Committee on Security, where Krishna was present, on the interrogation report of Headley before visiting Pakistan for the SAARC Interior Minister's conference last month.

Krishna was present in the meeting and copies of the interrogation report were sent to all concerned, including NSA Shivshankar Menon, the sources said.

Besides, the sources said, India's High Commissioner to Pakistan and a "note taker" from Islamabad mission were present in all but one meetings that Indian delegation had with Pakistan when Chidambarm visited that country last month.

"Except the one-on-one meeting between Home Minister Chidambaram and Pakistan's Interior Minister Rehman Malik, in all the other meetings the High Commissioner and a 'note taker' from the mission were present. So they are privy to all information that the delegation discussed with Pakistan," the sources said.

They said last week's Foreign Minister-level talks between India and Pakistan was heading nowhere as the Pakistan Army did not want them to succeed.

Expressing dismay over these developments, BJP spokesman Ravi Shankar Prasad said, "External Affairs Minister S M Krishna has spoken again... We want to remind Krishna that there is a thin line between sobriety and submission and we regret to say that he has transgressed this line."

Prasad said the UPA administration "cannot speak in one voice.. Why cannot they have this discipline?"
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Another Post S-e-S type squabble and confusion going on in GOI.Top 3 pillars of UPA govt. ie...rajmata sonia...yuvraj rahul...and OM manmohan singh are as silent as ever...Meanwhile officials and ministries squabble in public..JAI HO :emot112:

Unease in govt over Indo-Pak talks squabble



There is growing concern within the government over the damage internal recrimination, specially over Indo-Pak talks, is causing to its image. The issue has already given a handle to the Opposition parties, including the BJP and the Left, on the eve of Parliament's Monsoon session. "We are looking


like jokers," lamented a Union Minister.
The latest onslaught from within came from External Affairs Minister SM Krishna who alleged that Home Secretary G.K. Pillai's remarks on the eve of the Indo-Pak foreign minister-level talks had "underpinned" his visit to Islamabad.

Krishna had been criticized for keeping quiet when Pakistan foreign minister SM Qureshi had equated Pillai with JuD chief Hafeez Sayeed for his comments that ISI and the Pakistan army were involved in 26/11.

Krishna's criticism of Pillai raised speculation whether the ministries of external and home affairs were at loggerheads.

"There is a trust deficit within the government," said another Union minister.

Rao tries to break ice

Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao called on Pillai to bridge the divide between the two ministries. Thursday's meeting took place at Pillai's North Block office on Raisina Hill long after the television crews outside had melted away. "I can only confirm there was a meeting," a government functionary said.

Pillai and Rao are understood to have discussed the Indo-Pak talks, his remarks on David Headley's probe report a day earlier and the controversy.

"I think the meeting would have cleared the air," a source later said.

Pak lauds Krishna

Islamabad was quick to welcome Krishna's critical remarks. A gleeful Interior Minister Rehman Malik on Thursday tweeted his thank you to New Delhi for "creating positivity".

"We appreciate PM India & Home Minister for advising their aides nt 2 (not to) give negative statements against Pak," Rehman tweeted on the micro-blogging networking site.
 

Oracle

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,120
Likes
1,566
Pakistan must punish 26/11 attack culprits, says US

The United States has said it is important for Pakistan to investigate the Mumbai terror attack and bring to justice those responsible for the entire region's benefit.

State Department spokesman P J Crowley told reporters at his daily news briefing that the US would continue to discuss with Pakistan the need to probe the 26/11 carnage that killed 166 people.

"There are things, clearly, that Pakistan must do. Certainly, continuing to investigate and bring to justice those who are responsible for the Mumbai attack is an important element," Crowley said.

India has blamed Pakistan-based terror outfit Lashkar-e-Tayiba for masterminding the attack, and the lone Pakistani terrorist arrested during the terror siege has been awarded a death sentence by a court.

A trial is also going on against seven suspects, including LeT operations commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, in Pakistan but India has said Islamabad should take more efforts to bring the masterminds to book.

"It's important to Pakistan. It's also important to India. And we will continue our conversations with Pakistan on the things that it needs to do not only for the benefit of Pakistan but the region as a whole," Crowley said.

The spokesperson said the US policy is to fully cooperate with Pakistan on tackling terrorism and to continue to work closely to help Pakistan battle the insurgency that now is a threat to the country itself.

"We've seen significant progress by Pakistan over the past year. It's an area that was part of the strategic dialogue that our governments just had in Islamabad," he said.

http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/jul/23/pakistan-must-punish-26-11-attack-culprits-says-us.htm
 

Oracle

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,120
Likes
1,566
Punish men behind 26/11, silence India: US to Pak

The United States gave heads up to India, besides Afghanistan and Pakistan, on the leak of more than 90,000 classified documents pertaining to the war against terrorism.

The documents released by Wikileaks, which the Obama Administration has termed as a federal violation, further strengthens what top Indian officials have been saying for quite some time now that ISI has links with Al Qaeda, Taliban and other extremist organizations.

"We also gave a heads-up to India," State Department spokesman P J Crowley told reporters at his daily news briefing on Monday. He said the governments of Afghanistan and Pakistan were also informed about the upcoming documents.

Both the White House and the State Department acknowledged that they are concerned about the links between ISI and the extremist elements.

"From the standpoint of India, India clearly, you know, wants to see that Pakistan is taking steps to bring to justice those people that threaten neighbouring states," Crowley said.

"So, clearly, as we've said many, many times, if Pakistan wants to convince India that it has made this kind of fundamental change, bringing to justice those who are responsible for the Mumbai attack would be a very, very constructive and important step," he said in response to a question.

Noting that combating terrorism is an element of its relationship with India, likewise with Pakistan and Afghanistan, he said the US strongly believes that the proof is in what people do, not what people say.

"As we've highlighted here, the fact that Pakistan is taking aggressive action against insurgents within its own borders reflects their understanding that now insurgents threaten Pakistan itself," Crowley said.

The spokesman said the US continues to have conversations with Pakistan on bringing to justice those responsible for the Mumbai attack.

http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/jul/27/punish-men-behind-2611-silence-india-us-to-pak.htm
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Double faced usa....

Headley's 26/11 revelations 'ticking time bomb' in Pak-US ties



WASHINGTON: David Headley's revelation that LeT planned the Mumbai attacks with possible help from the ISI is a "ticking time bomb" that could wreck the US- Pakistan relationship and take the subcontinent to disaster, a former CIA official has warned.

Bruce Riedel, a former CIA official and now with the prestigious Brookings Institute, said Pakistan should carry out a "thorough house cleaning" of its military after the Pakistani-American LeT operative's revelations that attackers had links to the ISI.


"Thanks to David Headley's extraordinary confessions, we now know how thoroughly LeT planned its 2008 Mumbai attack and how closely linked it is to al-Qaida - and perhaps to the Pakistani military," said

"There is no excuse for not executing a more robust crack down on Lashkar-e-Taiba and its front organisations from the Pakistani government and for not conducting a thorough house cleaning within the Pakistani army," he said commenting on the recent statements of top Indian officials that Headley's interrogations had given ample proof of ISI's involvement in the Mumbai terrorist attack.

"Headley revelations, if true, paint a picture of official Pakistani military cooperation in an act of mass causality terror that raises very worrisome and alarming questions about our most important partner and India's nuclear-armed neighbour," he said.

"The truth about Mumbai and the future of Lashkar-e-Taiba is the ticking time bomb that could wreck the nascent US-Pakistan partnership Secretary Clinton is rightly trying to build and that could take the subcontinent to disaster," Riedel said.

The former CIA official, who helped draft the new Afghanistan policy of the Obama Administration, said Headley is a convicted conspirator and may have his own reasons to mislead and lie, but his newest accusations are raising a firestorm in India.

Headley reportedly told his Indian interrogators that the Pakistani intelligence agency paid for the boat that took the 10 terrorists from Karachi to Indian waters and that Pakistani naval frogmen had provided intensive commando training for them.

Ajmal Kasab, the only terrorist arrested for the Mumbai attacks, also told the investigators about the naval training.

Home Secretary G K Pillai said that the Headley revelations show that Pakistani intelligence was "literally controlling and coordinating the attack from the beginning to end."

Ridel said: "Washington and New Delhi are both now waiting for Islamabad to respond. The Indians who have resumed their official dialogue with Pakistan after suspending it in the wake of 26/11 seem uncertain about how to proceed next.

"They have suspected Pakistani collusion in the Mumbai attacks from the start but could not prove it before Headley's statements," Riedel said.
 

ajtr

Tihar Jail
Banned
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
12,038
Likes
723
Indians may testify in Pak


Claiming that Pakistan policy of supporting some terrorist groups has changed, its ambassador here says Islamabad has asked India to send its officials to testify before Pakistani courts to help convict those responsible for Mumbai attacks. "The individuals who were responsible for the Mumbai


attack are all now under arrest," Pakistan's ambassador to US Husain Haqqani told CNN Sunday when asked about Pakistan's lack of action against Lashkar-e Tayyeba (LeT) terror group behind the November 26, 2008 Mumbai attack.
"And we have requested our Indian neighbours to provide us with evidence in the sense of allowing Indian officials who have knowledge of this matter, to travel to Pakistan and give evidence in our court," he said. "And we will be able to complete the prosecution process and convict these people."

When the interviewer suggested "This is, frankly, if it happens, a big change in Pakistani policy", Haqqani said: "Well, look, Pakistani policy changed very clearly, even after 9/11. It started changing. I think the changes are in much faster gear now.

"Our military leadership, our intelligence leadership, and our civilian leadership are all on the same page," he said.

Haqqani acknowledged "Pakistan's history has given a lot of people reason for cynicism about democracy, about our relations with our neighbours, about relations with the United States."

"But in this environment of cynicism I think we need to be very clear about one thing. Pakistan as a nation can have a good future only if we resolve our problems in our neighbourhood, our neighbours are reasonable about it, the United States support this process of transformation, and Pakistan emerges as a democracy."

"Pakistan wants to play well with the world, and that is where our future lies," he said.

Asked about whistleblower WikiLeaks revelations about "Pakistan's double game" of its spy agency working directly with the Afghan Taliban, Haqqani cited President Barack Obama to suggest "there is nothing in these entries that we haven't heard before."

"The important thing is that over the last two years Pakistan and the United States have entered into a special collaborative relationship," he said.

Pakistan was aware of historic concerns and was addressing them, Haqqani said. "And I can say with a great degree of comfort now that the Pakistani intelligence services are working effectively to contain all terrorists, including Taliban from Afghanistan and from Pakistan."

"These allegations are not necessarily reflective of what is happening today," he said.
 

Pintu

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
12,082
Likes
348
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...enters-last-lap-today/articleshow/6245737.cms

Kasab's death plea enters last lap today
Shibu Thomas, TNN, Aug 2, 2010, 01.09am IST

MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Monday will take up the state government's plea to confirm the death sentence awarded to Pakistani gunman Ajmal Amir Kasab. The application is scheduled to come up before a division bench of Justice Ranjana Desai and Justice Vijaya Kapse-Tahilramani.

Justice Desai is the senior-most judge in the high court after the Chief Justice. Both Justice Desai and Justice Tahilramani, who have long years of experiences in dealing with criminal cases, were public prosecutors at the high court before being appointed as judges.

Though a confirmation case requires the convict to be present during the hearings, a source in the prosecution office told TOI that Kasab was unlikely to be produced from his high-security prison cell in Arthur Road jail for the first hearing. "Directions regarding the case and documents are normally given by the judges in the first hearing,'' said the officer.

The actual hearing of the confirmation application, along with the appeals, may still take some time. Kasab's appeal challenging his death sentence as well as the state's plea against the acquittal of two other accused in the 26/11 case is yet to be filed.

"Only last week did we receive the copy of the evidence of the 26/11 trial that runs into 16,000 pages,'' said Advocate Farhana Shah, who along with Advocate Amin Solkar, is representing Kasab. Following a plea from Kasab who said he could not afford a lawyer, the Maharashtra Legal Services Authority appointed the two advocates. "We will have to pore over the evidence used against Kasab to formulate a defence and grounds for challenging the verdict,'' said Shah, adding that it might take another month before the appeal could be filed.

Special public prosecutor Ujwal Nikam told TOI that the state's appeal would be filed "shortly''. The state has said it will challenge the special court's verdict acquitting Kasab's co-accused Faheem Ansari and Sabahuddin Ahmed for "lack of evidence''. The government has appointed additional public prosecutor Shahaji Shinde to assist Nikam. Shinde confirmed that he had received a notification about his appointment.

Kasab, was the sole survivor among the 10 Pakistani terrorists who landed on Mumbai's shores on November 26, 2008 and unleashed terror on the city for three days. Their targets were Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus, Cama Hospital, Taj Mahal Hotel, Oberoi-Trident Hotel, Nariman House and Leopold restaurant, where 166 people were killed and several others were injured. After more than a year's trial, a special court held Kasab guilty of murder and conspiracy charges on May 6. He was convicted of personally killing seven persons, including constable Tukaram Ombale, and of being part of a plot to kill top police officials Hemant Karkare, Ashok Kamte and Vijay Salaskar. He has been sentenced to hang by the neck till death.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top