The Final Chapter In The Breakup Of Pakistan!

Indian Sniper.001

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2016
Messages
1,454
Likes
6,737
Country flag
I really wish Hafeez Saeed wins the elections. It would be interesting thereafter. Its not that the world doesn't know Pakistan is the home and breeding ground of terrorists, but there is kinda a sympathy for them from bleeding liberandus who feel 'Pakistani's' are innocent. And once they elect a leader who is also the leader of a terrorist faction, it would be interesting to see the world's reaction.
Anyways, the break-up of Pakistan started a while back, keep guessing ;)
 

Project Dharma

meh
Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
4,836
Likes
10,862
Country flag
who cares about the bolochi identity crises. Is hafiz saed running for PM or not?
At the rate at which we're hearing homosexual news from Pakistan, I think the more relevant question is - is Hafiz Saaed sleeping with the Prime Minister or not. :cool3:
 

Bengal_Tiger

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Messages
254
Likes
722
Country flag
Pakistan as a social organism has already collapsed on multiple levels. It's 2-nation theory of dividing people based on shared religion instead of shared culture was laid bare in 71. It's Punjabi population was forced to give up their heritage and adopt Urdu. They don't have a culture of their own. After dissing their Hindu roots for centuries, now they are claiming that Harappa and Taxilla is in Pakistan therefore all of Indian civilization, including Chanakya is Pakistani.

******s, first make up your mind, do you want to appropriate Hindu civilization or do you want to move away from it?

This lack of culture makes it easy for China to walk in and impose its own culture. Now all boards along CPEC are already being written in Chinese.

There is a deep Baniya desire in South Block to not see Pakistan as an enemy but as a market for Indian products. Instead of collapsing their economy, they want to setup steel plants, buy cheap potatoes, copper and jute, and nurture the idea of Pakistani bois roaming around with Bajaj Pulsars and MicroMax phones and Reliance Jio sims.

Lending agency doesn't count for shit. The CIA will fund Pakistan with bags of money if they have to. They need Pakistan more than ever. Afghanistan theater is heating up again, Russia is making inroads, China is making inroads in Pakistan, India is making inroads in Iran. The only service Pakistan can provide is that of a spoilsport, which is what the US highly values it for. The bar for US aid to Pakistan is set pretty low. All they have to do is prevent the rise of regional groupings by throwing a spanner in the works. The US will take care of its economy in return.

The US and China will hold Pakistan in place against an Indian attempt to break it. This jinx can only be broken if there is an internal ethnic churning in both the nations which keeps them busy.
Good post.

The US backs Pakistan and will ensure its continued role in destabilizing south Asia.

There is also a degree of Pakistano-philia on a cultural and personal level amongst the US elite, hence Pakistani never gets categorized with states such as Iran, Iraq, Syria etc as sponsor of terrorism, axis of evil.

So what can we expect?

Pakistan to continue as it is, intact but unstable.
 

gekko

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
518
Likes
2,688
Good post.

The US backs Pakistan and will ensure its continued role in destabilizing south Asia.

There is also a degree of Pakistano-philia on a cultural and personal level amongst the US elite, hence Pakistani never gets categorized with states such as Iran, Iraq, Syria etc as sponsor of terrorism, axis of evil.

So what can we expect?

Pakistan to continue as it is, intact but unstable.
All the value Pakistan derives is from its strategic location. It has no other resources to negotiate with, no skilled human resource, no soft power, no booming economy, and a very bad quality of life, and they are aware of it. They don't have a vested interest in improving any of that because there are no strategic gains linked to it. As long as they hold on to land and prevent it from slipping into Indian hands, the elites can continue living a lavish life.

There was a meeting in Pune where Christine Fair was 'coaching' old men with greying bald heads that India should be sending terrorists into Pakistan to harass them. At the outset, it sounds like a pro-India stance, but the scope as well as limitations of this move are quite obvious. They want Indians to restrict the offensive activities to only sub-conventional civilian casualties of worthless Pakis, but when a person asked if the US will support Indian moves to liberate Baluchistan, she immediately said "well..then Pakistan will ask for Gurdaspur, and Junagarh, you will face a problem then..". So their game plan is clear. Bleed both sides, but maintain status quo when it comes to territory. Any moves India makes to alter the territory in South Asia, will have to be done against full US might.

Timeline 1:28:25 an old man asks "why does USA support Pakistan..."


To which she claims that the USA needs to keep bribing Pakistan to keep supply lines in Afghanistan open, which is bullshit.

They think of us as idiots. They can bribe Pakistan in cash and gold. There is no need to bribe them with Harpoon missiles, radars, Viper attack helicopters, meant exclusively as a counter to Indian capabilities. In another video she says that "we know that processing immigration documents is not the only thing that the Indian embassy in Iran does". So, India is evil for trying to grow its sphere of influence in its own backyard, but America is very holy deploying its military assets across continents, right at our throats.

Rednecks need to be tackled first.
 

Hiranyaksha

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
2,098
Likes
4,515
Country flag
All the value Pakistan derives is from its strategic location. It has no other resources to negotiate with, no skilled human resource, no soft power, no booming economy, and a very bad quality of life, and they are aware of it. They don't have a vested interest in improving any of that because there are no strategic gains linked to it. As long as they hold on to land and prevent it from slipping into Indian hands, the elites can continue living a lavish life.

There was a meeting in Pune where Christine Fair was 'coaching' old men with greying bald heads that India should be sending terrorists into Pakistan to harass them. At the outset, it sounds like a pro-India stance, but the scope as well as limitations of this move are quite obvious. They want Indians to restrict the offensive activities to only sub-conventional civilian casualties of worthless Pakis, but when a person asked if the US will support Indian moves to liberate Baluchistan, she immediately said "well..then Pakistan will ask for Gurdaspur, and Junagarh, you will face a problem then..". So their game plan is clear. Bleed both sides, but maintain status quo when it comes to territory. Any moves India makes to alter the territory in South Asia, will have to be done against full US might.

Timeline 1:28:25 an old man asks "why does USA support Pakistan..."


To which she claims that the USA needs to keep bribing Pakistan to keep supply lines in Afghanistan open, which is bullshit.

They think of us as idiots. They can bribe Pakistan in cash and gold. There is no need to bribe them with Harpoon missiles, radars, Viper attack helicopters, meant exclusively as a counter to Indian capabilities. In another video she says that "we know that processing immigration documents is not the only thing that the Indian embassy in Iran does". So, India is evil for trying to grow its sphere of influence in its own backyard, but America is very holy deploying its military assets across continents, right at our throats.

Rednecks need to be tackled first.
She serves her countries interest and she is doing it in best possible way.
Sad part is that our professors and think tanks either get played or willfully narrate the narratives foreign powers want to propagate.

US was pro Pakistan even in 1971 yet we were successful to achieve our objective. I don't think that if we really want to repeat the same US or any other nation can stop us.
 

indus

Living in Post Truth
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
5,063
Likes
22,008
Country flag
All the value Pakistan derives is from its strategic location. It has no other resources to negotiate with, no skilled human resource, no soft power, no booming economy, and a very bad quality of life, and they are aware of it. They don't have a vested interest in improving any of that because there are no strategic gains linked to it. As long as they hold on to land and prevent it from slipping into Indian hands, the elites can continue living a lavish life.

There was a meeting in Pune where Christine Fair was 'coaching' old men with greying bald heads that India should be sending terrorists into Pakistan to harass them. At the outset, it sounds like a pro-India stance, but the scope as well as limitations of this move are quite obvious. They want Indians to restrict the offensive activities to only sub-conventional civilian casualties of worthless Pakis, but when a person asked if the US will support Indian moves to liberate Baluchistan, she immediately said "well..then Pakistan will ask for Gurdaspur, and Junagarh, you will face a problem then..". So their game plan is clear. Bleed both sides, but maintain status quo when it comes to territory. Any moves India makes to alter the territory in South Asia, will have to be done against full US might.

Timeline 1:28:25 an old man asks "why does USA support Pakistan..."


To which she claims that the USA needs to keep bribing Pakistan to keep supply lines in Afghanistan open, which is bullshit.

They think of us as idiots. They can bribe Pakistan in cash and gold. There is no need to bribe them with Harpoon missiles, radars, Viper attack helicopters, meant exclusively as a counter to Indian capabilities. In another video she says that "we know that processing immigration documents is not the only thing that the Indian embassy in Iran does". So, India is evil for trying to grow its sphere of influence in its own backyard, but America is very holy deploying its military assets across continents, right at our throats.

Rednecks need to be tackled first.
I have heard C Fair too on other forums. She is quite candid about USA - Pak relationship and knows pak is the problem child in both India and Afghanistan. However this is too much to say Pak will ask for Gurdaspur, Junagadh. These territories are fully assimilated into India. While there is a severe insurgency in Balochistan. Secondly we are not asking for Baloch to merge with India. So there is no question of junagadh or whatever. Best time to alter status quo in south asia is when USA is tangled with China or NK.
 

gekko

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2017
Messages
518
Likes
2,688
this is too much to say Pak will ask for Gurdaspur, Junagadh. These territories are fully assimilated into India.
That was precisely her point. That was her veiled threat. "As far as the US is concerned the issue of borders in South Asia has been settled to the satisfaction of US interests; Any attempt by India to redraw it will lead to hostility from Pakistan [and the US will support it]"

The US doesn't need to send a large chunk of its military to deal with NK or China. They can transfer the requisite tech to local sepoys S.Korea and Japan and let them take care of it. The US military is already deployed in all theaters in the world, and still has the surplus manpower to intervene in an extra theater or two.

Even a defeated presidential candidate like Hillary has the wherewithal to destabilize India without being on the presidential seat. Their arrogance doesn't come out of nothing. They have their war gaming done right and they have accounted for everything.

She is quite candid about USA - Pak relationship and knows pak is the problem child
She is playing the age old card of 'we were wrong about it'. Admitting to being wrong is much better than admitting to having deliberately done it, although it's the latter which happened. You will find in many think tank videos that American panelists are very candid in admitting their 'mistakes', these mistakes were well calibrated moves which they took with the full knowledge of the consequences, with the intention of brushing it off as a 'mistake' later.

If the US truly thinks it's a mistake to engage with Pakistan, they are welcome to correct it before they get a clean chit from India. They cannot give a clean chit to themselves and pat their own backs. Will the US forgive our mistake if India gives RDX to negros to blog up American buildings like they have been giving weapons to Pakistan? 80k Indians have died since the war of a thousand cuts, all financed by the US. Let that sink in. She is here to sell snake oil.
 
Last edited:

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,569
Likes
25,231
Country flag
Thread exists already... modzzz pleej merge!

Terrorist Hafiz launches Political Party in Pakistan, eyes 2018 general elections

He is not a balochistani ................He is just doing Propaganda to show that he is a Balochistaani and balochistaani are Pro-pak :pound::pound::pound: ..........
otherwise no need to choose this name ........there are many other paki members but nobody has names like Abdul panjabi , hamza pashtoon etc . :biggrin2:

we can see the opinions of real pashtoons on paki news channels and Facebook pages . :)

even Sindhi , Kashmiri and pashtoons have anti pak feelings just read their comments on social networking websites .

Most probably he is a Panjabi just like His Sister Qandeel Baloch .:pound::pound::pound:

That's a hot sexy Islamic Paki girl. :drool::drool::drool:


Our esteemed Terrorist Paki Panel: @Neo @Raja.pakistani @Zarvan @musalman @Zulfiqar Khan

You killed her before she could become the next Veena Malik. She was screwed in Bollywood from spot boys to directors/actors... mostly by hindooooo men. :clap2: :rofl: :india:

 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top