Yes, there should be intensive research to determine whether Westminster Abbey was actually built by Hindus and if the Pope was actually a Hindu priestP.N.Oak's research is based on many facts and not just opinion. I have only seen people ridiculing him on personal basis and not based on the merit of research. I think there should be intensive research to find out the truth.
Actually Oak's arguments appeared to be genuine they have some grounds valid or not only time will tell, but you after deleting 3 posts containing those facts calling it a crap!
If the engineers and architects involved used measurements also mentioned in Arthashastra, this proves what ?
Modern math was made possible by India's discovery of zero, that means all scientific discoveries are hindu/indian ?
And Tejo Mahalya crap again
If Galaxy take the initiative I will contribute some money. Anyway I have been wasting Rs1000-2000 every month after getting my salary on worthless books for last 5-6 years.Yes, there should be intensive research to determine whether Westminster Abbey was actually built by Hindus and if the Pope was actually a Hindu priest
Well, He already gave his complete research report. Everything was based on facts and proper reasoning. From Marble to architecture.^^ why don't the people who believe in it, gather funds, conduct research and publish it in a credible scientific journal ?
I thought in the same lines before reading about the other contents of the book. After reading it, I could only doActually Oak's arguments appeared to be genuine they have some grounds valid or not only time will tell, but you after deleting 3 posts containing those facts calling it a crap!
He already gave his research. Can you prove it whatever he said was wrong based on evidence/reason on historical facts ?If Galaxy take the initiative I will contribute some money. Anyway I have been wasting Rs1000-2000 every month after getting my salary on worthless books for last 5-6 years.
Research? First tell me what is your qualification to understand his research. Do you ever realised you are no different than those Pakis who Jump on Zaid Hameed's research work?He already gave his research. Can you prove it whatever he said was wrong based on evidence/reason on historical facts ?
That is what i expected when people doesn't have the answer.Yes, there should be intensive research to determine whether Westminster Abbey was actually built by Hindus and if the Pope was actually a Hindu priest
Lol !I can understand your approach, but if a person is mad then it doesn't mean that he never talks sane and if he talks sane people take it as madman's talks .I thought in the same lines before reading about the other contents of the book. After reading it, I could only do
My qualification is irrelevant as it's not my research. The moment i will give any controversial statement, Then it will be my responsible to give reasons.Research? First tell me what is your qualification to understand his research. Do you ever realised you are no different than those Pakis who Jump on Zaid Hameed's research work?
BTW, you can start with educating yourself about architectural styles of diffent cultures. I will get the answer yourwself.
I wanted to prevent the thread from going down the drain, unfortunately my efforts failed.Actually Oak's arguments appeared to be genuine they have some grounds valid or not only time will tell, but you after deleting 3 posts containing those facts calling it a crap!
Yeah some ancient story regarding the the boy who cried wolvesLol !I can understand your approach, but if a person is mad then it doesn't mean that he never talks sane and if he talks sane people take it as madman's talks .
Dint I say the sameBut here I wont call Oak a madman because his arguments in those deleted posts were making some good sense
And while we are at it, please keep your insults to the minimum.
See...I personally not sure about Taj Mahal nor i ever posted.@galaxy,
My friend, you are again using logical fallacies. You are supporting Mr Oak's assertions that Taj Mahal is a temple etc. It is your onus to prove it. It is your onus to provide proof which a layman can understand. And this is the least you can do considering you are novice in this field yourself.
Why don't you go to google scholar and search westminister abbey a hindu temple for eg
And while we are at it, please keep your insults to the minimum.
I think we should let the members post evidences and arguments, at least it will be interesting to learn new facts about Taj Mahal, I heard about it but never read such detailed studies. And for Taj Mahal Oak's arguments were making some sense but not those like "Pope was a Hindu priest" however you may disagree with me.I wanted to prevent the thread from going down the drain, unfortunately my efforts failed.
There is always a member who will invariably post that Taj is a mandir in any thread related to Taj mahal and the usual bs happens.
If you, however, want to "seriously" and "academically" discuss PN Oak's theories, please go ahead and make a new thread.
Dint I say the same
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Taj Mahal a mausoleum or a Shiva temple? CIC asks govt to clarify | History & Culture | 8 | ||
Taj Mahal A Worth Visit | Members Corner | 0 | ||
Taj Mahal should be declared a Waqf Board property: Azam Khan | History & Culture | 3 | ||
J | Taj Mahal was a Hindu temple 110 proof | History & Culture | 56 |