'Pakistan's Nasr missile is the most dangerous development in South Asia'

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
Where is this @Zarvan dude now? Looks like got hit by his own Nasr missile and it's substandard 60km range. Maybe during tests the missile fell on Lahore itself and instead of targeting kuffars the missile targeted Muzzies due to faulty Chinese systems. :hehe:
He is working on kufur and non kufur sensors to be fitted on nasr missile when they fire nasr will ask people in India r u kufur or non kufur[emoji13][emoji12][emoji12][emoji12][emoji13][emoji12][emoji12]
 

Zarvan

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
638
Likes
300
We know that, we both won't exist, but we will have turned your Kabba into an irradiated crater on our way out.

Our nuclear subs can get as close as 115 km to Mecca, and unload a barrage of nuclear-tipped SLBMs on it. Let's see how many you'll be able to intercept when your response time is under 150 seconds from launch to detonation.
You give it a try mate we would nuke each and every Indian City Makkah and Madinah will be protected by Pakistan and its Armed Forces with more passion than Pakistan. You give it a try and every soul in Indian will face most brutal and gruesome death.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo

Zarvan

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
638
Likes
300
From @tarunraju 's posts it is evident that he has been thinking of that at least since you started your BS of Nasr, where is the nuke?

Actually India needs to officially state that on face of repeatitive threat of nuclear attack by Pakistni authorities, it has decided to abandon the no first use policy against Pakistan only. Any movement of their nuclear arsenal will be cause for a first strike by India. We would like to see what BS they tell and what action those morons take.
Nasr is a missile designed to desimate Indian Armored Divisions. You will try to enter our border and hell will be in leashed on you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neo

tharikiran

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
763
Likes
1,040
Country flag
Actually this ambiguity is already there in the in India's nuclear policy. India has a no first use policy, but only against non-nuclear states.
Go through this..Indian section--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_first_use

"A speech by India's then NSAShivshankar Menon at National Defence College in New Delhi on October 21, 2010 changed the wording from "no first use" to "no first use against non-nuclear weapon states",[14] although some argued that this was not a substantive change but "an innocent typographical or lexical error in the text of the speech."

Doesn't matter if it was a lexical error.
At the end end of the day,the policy is just a piece of paper and can be dropped/changed as the situation changes... as Russia did in 2000 as it revoked its no first use policy once it felt it didn't have the conventional superiority over NATO forces.So, it's game on with Pakistan.
 

bose

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2010
Messages
4,921
Likes
5,961
Country flag
It is our duty to liberate Kashmir and take Delhi which we would take
Carry out your duty... we are waiting for you for 68 years... until then just watch how we kill the Pigs ...

We will give you a grand welcome ...

Come on ... we are waiting for you...
 

tarunraju

Sanathan Pepe
Mod
Joined
Sep 18, 2009
Messages
9,080
Likes
40,077
Country flag
You give it a try mate we would nuke each and every Indian City Makkah and Madinah will be protected by Pakistan and its Armed Forces with more passion than Pakistan. You give it a try and every soul in Indian will face most brutal and gruesome death.
Then we'll match your vigor to defend it with our vigor to destroy it.
 

jackprince

Turning into a frog
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2009
Messages
4,962
Likes
16,868
Country flag
You give it a try mate we would nuke each and every Indian City Makkah and Madinah will be protected by Pakistan and its Armed Forces with more passion than Pakistan. You give it a try and every soul in Indian will face most brutal and gruesome death.
And what makes you think that we cannot be as ruthless and bring similar torment to Pakistanis? I personally like your kind of Pakistanis who show the actual truth of Pakistanis and harden the hearts of Indians. Thanx to your kind many more Indians will rejoice the destruction of Pakisatn, than it was even a decade ago - wonder of internet, huh?
 

Adioz

शक्तिः दुर्दम्येच्छाशक्त्याः आगच्छति
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2015
Messages
1,419
Likes
2,819
Nasr is a missile designed to desimate Indian Armored Divisions. You will try to enter our border and hell will be in leashed on you.
Zarvan buddy, please talk sense
What in hell is the logic of initiating a suicide mission with this stupid idea of nuking forward Indian forces as a first strike just to stop an Indian advance? Is that your confidence in your conventional warfare abilities? Even if you hurt India a lot in this process, you would practically give India the license to wipe out your nation with a retaliatory strike. Is this idea worth it?
If you expend this effort in not suicidal platforms like Nasr but in developing your conventional warfare capabilities to delay Indian action till international pressure builds, you would have more than just a chance of surviving a conflict with India, something that the nuclear option you pursue takes right off the table. Don't buy this B.S. propaganda your government is selling you. Question your leaders like we question ours. With the right efforts, training and doctrine, even a weaker force can play havoc with a stronger one. We Indians plan to do the same in the event of Chinese adventurism. You can plan to do the same to us
 

rohit.gr77

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
135
Likes
119
Zarvan buddy, please talk sense
What in hell is the logic of initiating a suicide mission with this stupid idea of nuking forward Indian forces as a first strike just to stop an Indian advance? Is that your confidence in your conventional warfare abilities? Even if you hurt India a lot in this process, you would practically give India the license to wipe out your nation with a retaliatory strike. Is this idea worth it?
If you expend this effort in not suicidal platforms like Nasr but in developing your conventional warfare capabilities to delay Indian action till international pressure builds, you would have more than just a chance of surviving a conflict with India, something that the nuclear option you pursue takes right off the table. Don't buy this B.S. propaganda your government is selling you. Question your leaders like we question ours. With the right efforts, training and doctrine, even a weaker force can play havoc with a stronger one. We Indians plan to do the same in the event of Chinese adventurism. You can plan to do the same to us
You are asking Pakis to do the most impossible. These people can never talk sense. They were ready to eat grass to go nuclear since India went nuclear. Now they issue stupid threats with their stupid toys. What next, these people will say that they are ready to eat bull shit, camel shit and pig shit but will nuke each and every Indian city.
 

LalTopi

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2012
Messages
583
Likes
311
It is our duty to liberate Kashmir and take Delhi which we would take
'And take Delhi' . that is the real aim is it not? bugger the Kasmiris, you just have one big chip on your shoulder. You just want to dominate Hindhus because you want to prove to be something that you are not. Tell me are you Mughal? , are you Persian? Are you Sayyid? my guess is that your ancestors were just lower class peasant farmers and you are just a wannabe Sayyid, Moghal etc. It's not Hindhus that are your enemy, it's your own lack of self esteem because deep down inside you know that your blood is that of peasantry and you have an almighty chip on your shoulder because of it.
 

LalTopi

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2012
Messages
583
Likes
311
How would they be the saviors of their faith when they're endangering it? Again, this is my line of argument.

Build defences > Hope for the best > If there's another 26/11, have the ability to cross LoC/IB. The current nuclear equation doesn't allow that, so Pakistan will continue to fun terrorism in India forever. My bright idea is to change the nuclear equation in a way that we get to cross LoC/IB, and they stay away from the nuclear option, just the way we stayed away from it, for the dozens of times they crossed LoC/IB since we both got nukes.
Judging by the reaction of this wannabe Mughal Zarwan, you may have a point in targeting that which these idiots claim to defend the most. Though I have no desire to destroy current cities and populations for past transgressions it may be worthwhile emphasising to the Saudis that if they continue to fund Pakistan then they are inviting Armageddon on themselves.
 

thethinker

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
2,808
Likes
6,489
Country flag
It is our duty to liberate Kashmir and take Delhi which we would take
All the best for such adventures!

Here is some non madrassa perspective regarding what you plan to accomplish though.

What is the most blatant lie taught through Pakistan textbooks?

http://www.dawn.com/news/1125484

The most blatant lies in Pakistani history textbooks are about the events that are still in our living memory. Among the many examples, the three given below are about the wars of 1965 and 1971, and the partition carnage of 1947. The reason for the falsehood lies in our distorted view of nationalism. Rather than let children learn from our historical mistakes, we show them a false picture. Thus we are doomed to repeat the mistakes generation after generation.

The following excerpt regarding the 1965 war is taken from fifth grade reading material published by the NWFP Textbook Board, Peshawar in 2002 — “The Pakistan Army conquered several areas of India, and when India was at the verge of being defeated she ran to the United Nations to beg for a cease-fire. Magnanimously, thereafter, Pakistan returned all the conquered territories to India.”

The Punjab Textbook Board published the following text on the causes for the separation of East Pakistan in 1993 for secondary classes — “There were a large number of Hindus in East Pakistan. They had never truly accepted Pakistan. A large number of them were teachers in schools and colleges.

They continued creating a negative impression among students. No importance was attached to explaining the ideology of Pakistan to the younger generation.

The Hindus sent a substantial part of their earnings to Bharat, thus adversely affecting the economy of the province. Some political leaders encouraged provincialism for selfish gains. They went around depicting the central Government and (the then) West Pakistan as enemy and exploiter. Political aims were thus achieved at the cost of national unity.”

“While the Muslims provided all sorts of help to those non-Muslims desiring to leave Pakistan [during partition], people of India committed atrocities against Muslims trying to migrate to Pakistan. They would attack the buses, trucks and trains carrying the Muslim refugees and murder and loot them.” The latter except was taken from an intermediate classes textbook — Civics of Pakistan, 2000.

Some more examples of totally contorted and misleading, yet ingenious and amusing, narrations of the history of Pakistan can be extracted from a single text, A Textbook of Pakistan Studies by M D Zafar.

“Pakistan came to be established for the first time when the Arabs led by Muhammad bin Qasim occupied Sindh and Multan. Pakistan under the Arabs comprised the Lower Indus Valley.”

“During the 11th century the Ghaznavid Empire comprised what is now Pakistan and Afghanistan. During the 12th century the Ghaznavids lost Afghanistan and their rule came to be confined to Pakistan”.

“By the 13th century Pakistan had spread to include the whole of Northern India and Bengal. Under the Khiljis Pakistan moved further South to include a greater part of Central India and the Deccan”.

“During the 16th century, ‘Hindustan’ disappeared and was completely absorbed in ‘Pakistan”.

“Shah Waliullah appealed to Ahmad Shah Durrani of Afghanistan and ‘Pakistan’ to come to the rescue of the Muslims of Mughal India, and save them from the tyrannies of the Marhattas…”

“In the Pakistan territories where a Sikh state had come to be established, the Muslims were denied the freedom of religion.”

“Thus by the middle of the 19th century both Pakistan and Hindustan ceased to exist; instead British India came into being. Although Pakistan was created in August 1947, yet except for its name, the present-day Pakistan has existed, as a more or less single entity for centuries.”

— A H Nayyar is a physicist and retired professor. He co-edited an SDPI report titled “The Subtle Subversion: The State of Curricula and Textbooks in Pakistan.
 

Zarvan

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2014
Messages
638
Likes
300
Judging by the reaction of this wannabe Mughal Zarwan, you may have a point in targeting that which these idiots claim to defend the most. Though I have no desire to destroy current cities and populations for past transgressions it may be worthwhile emphasising to the Saudis that if they continue to fund Pakistan then they are inviting Armageddon on themselves.
No they aren't but even a thought if India going to attack KSA will bring all Muslim Armed Forces together to attack you and kick your butts
 

LalTopi

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2012
Messages
583
Likes
311
No they aren't but even a thought if India going to attack KSA will bring all Muslim Armed Forces together to attack you and kick your butts
Yes but apart from your fascination with our butts, answer my question. Tell me are you Mughal? , are you Persian? Are you Sayyid?
 
Last edited:

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
No they aren't but even a thought if India going to attack KSA will bring all Muslim Armed Forces together to attack you and kick your butts


why not all muslim nation came together in 1971,kargil and to liberate kashmir ????? to kick our butt

bol mere gulu butt
 

rohit.gr77

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2015
Messages
135
Likes
119
No they aren't but even a thought if India going to attack KSA will bring all Muslim Armed Forces together to attack you and kick your butts
All Muslim Armed Forces together got their arse kicked by a small country like Israel. Imagine what will happen when India
would decide to kick your butts. You guys will never learn from your mistakes. No problem you'll can keep trying till Qayamat and get your arse kicked every single time.
 

Blackwater

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2012
Messages
21,156
Likes
12,211
All Muslim Armed Forces together got their arse kicked by a small country like Israel. Imagine what will happen when India
would decide to kick your butts. You guys will never learn from your mistakes. No problem you'll can keep trying till Qayamat and get your arse kicked every single time.

what r u talking about . pakis pilot went to arab on horse back , made israeli plane tossed in air with their sword on route to gazwa-a-hind:biggrin2::biggrin2::biggrin2::biggrin2:
 

brational

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2014
Messages
1,223
Likes
2,644
Country flag
One psycho died of Brain hemorrhage yesterday because he was obsesses with "nuking India". That lunatic was known as Hamid Gul. Millions more to go.
 

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top