Naxals/Maoists Watch

Should the Indian government use armed forces against the naxals/maoists?


  • Total voters
    426

Logan

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
133
Likes
1
Country flag
Nepalese Maoists slam ban on Indian Maoists

Kathmandu, June 27: Though claiming they have no links with their Indian counterparts, Nepalese Maoists have slammed the ban imposed on the Maoist in India, saying that the confrontation should be solved politically and not militarily.

"The Maoist problem in India is a political problem and I think it should be resolved politically and no military solution should be sought to resolve the issue," Unified CPN-Maoist Foreign Relations Department chief C P Gajurel said, as he denied any "working relation" with them.

"As a political organisation we cannot support the move to ban the Maoist organisation, which is a political group," he said.

"We did not have any working relation with the Indian Maoists in the past and also we will not establish such links in future," he clarified. But as a political organisation we have our own views and we cannot buy the idea of banning that organization, said Gajurel.

The Maoists of India have their own ideology, their political organisation, their aim and ideology. The group which is aimed at bringing total transformation in the society cannot be termed as terrorist and should not be banned, he said.

Nepalese Maoists slam ban on Indian Maoists
I don't know how people get the mentality to justify a terrorist movement.Do they understand the difference between a political movement and a terrorist activity,,i really doubt that!!!!!!
But no problem,,, for those who dosen't understand or dosen't want to understand we will thrust the bullets down their throat to make them see reason!!!
 

Oracle

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,120
Likes
1,566
Time to revisit Naxal Strategy, says Chidambaram

Cabinet meets today to discuss Maoist violence

Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh is expected to convene a crucial Cabinet meeting on Tuesday to discuss the "limited mandate" given to the home ministry to deal with the Naxal violence.

The meeting is being convened on the instance of Home Minister P Chidambaram, who stressed upon Dr Singh to reconsider the strategy after the latest violence which killed as many as 50 lives.

"I have spoken to the prime minister about it. We will have to revisit the earlier strategy," he told mediapersons in New Delhi.

Asked if he was unhappy with the limited mandate, he said, "I took to the Cabinet Committee case for a larger
mandate, I was given a limited mandate. I will go back to the Cabinet Committee," he added.

While condemning the increased violence, Chidambaram has aksed the civil society to raise their voice against senseless killing.

"I want to ask those writers who have been writing in favour of Maoists to rise and speak against senseless killing of ordinary people," he said.

The home minister also said the states had asked for more forces to tackle the menace. He cited the example of Chhattisgarh, which wants 70 companies, while the mandate is only 24 companies."

"The chief ministers of Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, West Bengal, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh all want air support. After all they are the people on the ground," he said.

Meanwhile, Communist Party of India (Marxist) general secretary Prakash Karat also condemned the senseless killing and asked the affected state governments and the Centre to evolve a strategy to deal with the Maoist violence.

Onkar Singh in New Delhi

http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/may/18/need-to-revisit-naxal-strategy-says-chidambaram.htm
 

Pintu

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
12,082
Likes
348
http://www.ptinews.com/news/656636_Local-Congress-leader-shot-dead

Local Congress leader shot dead

STAFF WRITER 17:55 HRS IST

Simdega (Jharkhand), May 17 (PTI) Stepping up their offensive, Maoists shot dead a local Congress leader inside his vehicle and set it ablaze in Lumbatoli village in the district.

The victim, Hemant Bage, was on way to his relative's house when a group of ultras intercepted his vehicle and shot him dead, Sub-divisional Police Officer (Simdega), Varun Kumar said today.

Kumar said the ultras then torched the vehicle. Police recovered the half burnt vehicle as well as Bage?s body. Bage was a youth Congress block president.

After the brazen act, the ultras left behind posters owning responsibility for the crime. Police launched a massive search operation in the area to track them down.

Less than two months back, the Maoists had gunned down Dalbhumgarh Block President of Congress, Gobardhan Mahali in Ghatsila in East Singhbhum district.

Former Congress MLA Neol Tirkey was yesterday threatened by the Maoists.
 

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
35 killed as Maoists blow up bus in Chhattisgarh


Bodies lie scattered at the blast site at Chingavaram on the Dantewada-Sukhma road in Chhattisgarh.

Twenty four civilians and 11 special police officers were killed when members of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) blew up a private bus using a powerful Improvised Explosive Device (IED). Civilians comprised youth appearing for a constabulary exam.

At least 35 people – 24 civilians and 11 Special Police Officers – were killed on Monday when Maoists blew up a private bus using a powerful Improvised Explosive Device (IED). The blast occurred at 4.30 p.m. at Chingavaram on the Dantewada-Sukhma road in Chhattisgarh.

In Raipur, Inspector General R.K. Vij confirmed the death of 12 security personnel, but police sources at the spot said a total of 35 bodies were recovered. "Search operations have been suspended for the night," said a senior police officer.

"As the exact number of passengers in the bus is not known, a final figure shall be provided after a daylight search."

At present, 17 SPOs and 10 civilians, all injured, have been counted so far. The bus was carrying 50-60 people.

The sources said those escaping from the bus came under fire from Maoists. The civilians comprised youth appearing for a constabulary exam.

"Currently we are in the midst of a recruitment drive," confirmed the police officer. "Those killed were returning to Sukhma after the exam."

In the past week, the police carried out extensive de-mining operations in the area. On May 14, the police defused IEDs weighing about 65 kg on the Bhejji-Gorkha road and another IED, weighing about 15 kg, near Chintalnar. On May 15, nine crude bombs were discovered in Kanker district. However, officials stressed their inability to declare any area totally mine-free.

"Maoist fast food"

"IEDs are like Maoist fast food," said a police officer. "The mines can be planted in as little as 15 minutes. An area can be completely de-mined, but Maoists would plant a bomb within half-an-hour."

Officials said the recent attacks were part of an annual Maoist Tactical Counter Offensive Campaign . "Every year we see a spike in Maoist violence in the prelude to the monsoon season [mid-June to Mid-August]," said the sources. In an IED explosion in Bijapur district on May 8, seven CRPF personnel were killed. On April 6, Maoists massacred 75 CRPF soldiers and one police head constable in an ambush.

Maoists have also stepped up attacks against tribals and civilians who, they feel, are assisting the police. On May 17, Maoists killed six tribals in Rajanandgaon for allegedly passing information to the police.

Crucial cog

Adivasi youth are a crucial cog in the State's fight against Maoists as they know the terrain and are familiar with Maoist methods. Besides recruiting tribals into the regular force, the police have also stepped up efforts to recruit Special Police Officers to serve as guides in jungle combing operations.

Police recruitment in Chhattisgarh has gathered momentum as the shortfall is affecting the operations of para-military forces.

http://beta.thehindu.com/news/article432488.ece
 

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
PC seeks air support to take on Maoists

New Delhi, May 17: Hours after Naxals blew up a bus in Chhattisgarh killing over 30 people, the Union home minister, Mr P. Chidambaram, said he had a "limited" mandate and has asked the Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, for more, hinting at the demand by some states for use of air-support to tackle the Maoists.

Replying to questions on the need for air-support to tackle the Naxal menace and the Cabinet Committee on Security's refusal to endorse the use of the same, Mr Chidambaram said, "I can implement the mandate that is given to me. Now I believe that the collective wisdom is better than an individual statement."

Specifically asked whether he wanted air-support for the operations, the minister said, "The security forces, the Chief Ministers want air-support."

He said the Chief Ministers of Bengal, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and Orissa have asked for air-support.

Mr Chidambaram said he "tried" to convince his government on the issue.

Replying to a question about the criticism for being able to develop consensus on his approach, he said, "No Chief Minister has found fault with my approach so far. I argued before the CCS and I got a limited mandate."

Asked if he was unhappy with the limited mandate, he said, "I took to the Cabinet committee case for a larger mandate, I was given a limited mandate. I will go back to the Cabinet committee, I have already spoken to the Prime Minister. We will go back to the Cabinet committee to revisit that mandate in light of the revised strategy that the CPI(Maoist) is following of which we have enough evidence and intelligence."

He said the Naxals don't make a distinction between the "Central and state police forces. They simply kill."

http://www.deccanchronicle.com/national/pc-seeks-air-support-take-maoists-734
 

tharikiran

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2009
Messages
763
Likes
1,040
Country flag
Somethings gotta give. Have we reached the tippin point yet ? In the last one year. How many naxals have our forces killed ?
It's like the forces are searching for a ghost in the jungle.You dont see him but he's(Mao Bhayya's) watchin you.

It's frustrating to watch the news.
 

Prince

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
44
Likes
7
Army to discuss growing Maoist threat

The four-day Army Commanders conference, which began in Delhi on Monday, is scheduled to discuss the growing threat of Maoist extremism.

Lt. Gen. VK Ahluwalia, Central Army Commander, based in Lucknow, will make a presentation on Army's possible response to the situation.

In anticipation of such a possibility over the past one year, the Army has undertaken a detailed study on the Maoist issue. Those findings will also be discussed at the Army Commanders conference.

A serving brigadier is already deputed in the Home Ministry as adviser.

The Naxal-affected state governments will be asked to take in one brigadier-level officer as security-cum-training adviser as a start
http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/army-to-discuss-growing-maoist-threat-26182.php?u=1000
 

Prince

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
44
Likes
7
Army proposes new anti-Naxal training centre

New Delhi: In the backdrop of major attacks by Maoists against paramilitary and Central police personnel, the Army has proposed to set up a dedicated centre to ready the security men for the battle against the Naxals.

The proposal was made during the ongoing Army Commanders' Conference here and it was suggested that the new centre could be set up on the lines of the Army's Counter Insurgency and Jungle Warfare School (CIJWS) in Mizoram.

Army sources said here today that the Commanders discussed the issue and they were willing to offer the services of defence officers as instructors at the new school for training the paramilitary personnel.

The new centre, sources said, would be in addition to the anti-Naxal operations training that the Army has been provided for the last six years now.

The training all these years were taking place both at the Army's Corps Training Centres and at the Central Paramilitary Forces' training schools in the states affected by Maoist menace.

The Army has so far trained 46,343 paramilitary, state and central police personnel in anti-Naxal operations.

The Army commanders are also scheduled to get an update on Naxal menace in central states with the Central Army Command under Lt Gen V K Ahluwalia making a presentation on 'The Naxal Situation: Its Likely Developments and Resources Required' on the penultimate day of their five-day conference.

The idea of a dedicated training school for paramilitary and police forces was floated even as Maoists triggered an Improvised Explosive Device to blow up a bus killing 35 passengers, including 20 special police officers, in Dantewada district of Chhattisgarh yesterday.

The Maoists had on April 7 attacked a CRPF party slaughtering 76 of its personnel who were returning after a search operation in Dantewada forests.

The demand for involving the armed forces in anti-Naxal campaign came up after the April 7 incident but the Defence Ministry and the Army in particular are averse to the idea.

They have been arguing that use of the defence forces against own citizens was not advisable and that the Naxal menace was only a law and order problem for which the primarily responsibility is that of the state police.
http://www.zeenews.com/news627622.html
 

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
Kishenji resurfaces with bandh call

After Monday's massacre by Maoists in Dantewada, CPM leader Kishanji has resurfaced in a video footage calling for a bandh.

In the video sent to local channels, Kishenji calls for a bandh on Tuesday and Wednesday in West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand, Orissa and Chhattisgarh.

This is the first time Kishenji has spoken out since the reports that he was either dead or injured in a security operation against Naxalites near Lalgarh.

"I have been well and now I am speaking with you as before," said the Maoist leader, who is demanding an end to operation Greenhunt.

He has also criticised the Trinamool Congress and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) for not protesting effectively against rising prices.

http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/kishenji-resurfaces-with-bandh-call-26277.php
 

Sikh_warrior

Professional
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
504
Likes
273
We cannot give up our weapons: Naxal leader to Chidambaram
PTI, May 18, 2010, 08.48pm IST

NEW DELHI/BASTAR: A day after Naxals unleashed another attack in Chattisgarh, home minister P Chidambaram on Tuesday made a fresh offer today to hold talks if they "suspend" violence even for just 72 hours but the Left-wing extremists rejected it.

The offer was dismissed by Naxal leader Ramanna who said in Bastar district in Chhattisgarh, "we cannot give up our weapons".

He said the Naxal's had responded to the Home Minister's earlier offer for talks. "But the government did not believe us. There is a heavy presence of security forces and their atrocities are continuing every day," he said.

Ramanna said the attack on the civilian bus in Dantewada district yesterday was aimed at Special Police Officers who were travelling on it. Several passengers including SPOs were killed when their bus blown up by the Naxals.

"The administration used civilians as human shields, so they got killed. But I regret this," he said.

"Maoists should say 'We will abjure violence. We will suspend violence and actually suspend violence for 72 hours'. We will get the Chief Ministers on board. We will respond. We will fix a date, time and place for talks and let the Maoists come for the talks on anything they wish to talk," Chidambaram said.

Chidambaram contended that the CPI(Maoist) never responded "seriously" to the earlier offer of talks. "They are indulging in gimmickery I am afraid media plays up that gimmick," he said.

Asked whether government forces will also halt all operations against them during the period of ceasefire, the Home Minister responded, "That goes without saying".

Chidambaram said "if they observe complete suspension of violence for just 72 hours, it goes without saying that police will not take any action against any CPI(Maoist) activist, hideouts or camps."

He said complete suspension means there should not be any attack on infrastructure, any landmine blast or any targetting of telephone towers.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...leader-to-Chidambaram/articleshow/5946020.cms
 
Last edited by a moderator:

nandu

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
1,913
Likes
163
Home works on a larger mandate: moving men from J&K, 20 choppers

Seeking a larger mandate to deal with Naxalites, the Home Ministry plans to approach the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) within a fortnight with a proposal to withdraw a limited number of counter-insurgency trained BSF and CRPF battalions from Jammu and Kashmir and redeploy them in four states worst hit by Naxal violence.

The Ministry is also considering asking for at least 20 helicopters for aerial reconnaissance, domination and troop redeployment.

Official sources told The Indian Express that since the government does not want to use either the Army or the Rashtriya Rifles against the Naxalites, it is proposed that the military take over certain hinterland areas — not towns or cities — in J&K that are currently being patrolled by the CRPF. If the CCS permits, a couple of BSF battalions too will be pulled back from the border for anti-Naxal operations and the Rashtriya Rifles would fill in.

Earlier, North Block was keen on requisitioning four battalions of para commandos from the Rashtriya Rifles for special anti-Naxal operations. But this was ruled out by South Block after discussions with the Army brass.

The view was that nothing should be done to dilute the counter-insurgency grid in J&K. The matter is now closed since even the government does not want to get the Army involved in anti-Naxal operations.

Adding to Home Minister P Chidambaram's problems, West Bengal wants some 80 paramilitary companies for the municipal elections since there is apprehension of violence. North Block may end up sending at least 50 companies to the state.

For the Kumbh Mela, 126 companies were deployed. Some 100 companies are likely to be pressed in for the Commonwealth Games in Delhi and another 250 companies for the Bihar elections later this year.

While Chidambaram will seek more equipment and better logistics for the troopers, North Block wants at least 20 medium-lift helicopters for surveillance and ferrying of troops in Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa and Maharashtra. As of today, only seven IAF Mi-17/ Mi-8 helicopters have been earmarked for anti-Naxal duties, including transportation of commanders and VIPs.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/h...date-moving-men-from-j&k-20-choppers/620746/0
 

AkhandBharat

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
542
Likes
79
Should the government use Armed forces against the Naxals/Maoists?

The maoists have struck at the nation time and again, and lately have attacked the Indian paramilitary forces and Indian police forces. They are disrupting facilities and blowing up infrastructure. They have been declared as the single most biggest threat to India's national security.

Don't you think think its about time the Indian government should start an operation against these terrorists and eliminate the thread before it plunges India into civil war?
 

AkhandBharat

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
542
Likes
79
Naxals biggest terrorists: Chhattisgarh CM

Terming Naxals as the biggest terrorists, Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Raman Singh today said there cannot be a "soft line" to deal with Maoists but disfavoured use of air power to combat the menace.

Attributing the recent spur in the Naxal violence to frontal operations by the security forces in the state, Singh favoured a long-term action joint action plan with the Centre to tackle the problem.

Singh is in the capital to meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Deputy Chairman of Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia two days after the Naxal attack in Dantewada left 35 people dead including 14 SPOs.

Giving details of Naxal activities in the last 10 years in Chhattisgarh, he said the ultras have killed more than 1000 civilians and more than 650 policemen besides blowing up 132 electric towers, 106 school buildings and three hospitals in the state.
 

AkhandBharat

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
542
Likes
79
Casualties of Naxalite/Maoist_insurgency

History

Main article: Timeline of the Naxalite-Maoist insurgency

The Naxalite movement started when a militant section of CPI(M) led by Charu Majumdar and Kanu Sanyal attacked the police on 25 May 1967 in Naxalbari village in North Bengal after a farmer was killed over a land dispute. The same year the Naxalites organised the All India Coordination Committee of Communist Revolutionaries (AICCCR), and later broke away from CPI(M). In the 2000s there were peace talks with the state government of Andhra Pradesh.

2002
The People's War Group (PWG) intensified its attacks against politicians, police officers, and land and business owners in response to a July ban imposed on the group by the Andhra Pradesh government. The government responded by tightening security, allegedly ordering attacks on suspected PWG members by state police and the "Green Tigers". Police forces continued to enjoy virtual impunity for the murder and torture of PWG rebels during police "encounters". The Maoist Communist Center rebels intensified their armed campaign against Indian security forces following the killing of their leader by police in December.

2003
The conflict in Andhra Pradesh intensified as Naxalite rebel groups, in particular the PWG, continued guerrilla attacks on police and government targets while the security forces stepped up counter-insurgency efforts. An October assassination attempt on Chief Minister Naidu was consistent with the PWG's practice of targeting government officials to draw attention to their cause.

2004
Sporadic, low-intensity fighting between the PWG and government forces continued for most of the year. Attacks on police and TDP party officials, believed to be carried out by the PWG, accounted for most major incidents and deaths. A three-month cease-fire, announced in late June, led to failed negotiations between the government and the PWG. A few days into the cease-fire, an attack attributed to the PWG placed the cease-fire in jeopardy.

2005
Violent clashes between Maoist rebels and state security forces and paramilitary groups increased following the breakdown of peace talks between the PWG and the state government of Andhra Pradesh. Rebels continued to employ a wide-range of low-intensity guerrilla tactics against government institutions, officials, security forces and paramilitary groups. For the first time in recent years, Maoist rebels launched two large scale attacks against urban government targets. Fighting was reported in 12 states covering most of south, central and north India with the exception of India's northeast and northwest.

2006
Maoists attacks continued, primarily on government and police targets. Civilians were also affected in landmine attacks affecting railway cars and truck convoys. Clashes between state police and rebels also resulted in deaths of members of both parties, and civilians that were caught in the crossfire. Fighting differs from state to state, depending on security and police force responses. In the state of Andhra Pradesh, security forces have been somewhat successful in maintaining control and combating Maoist rebels. The other state that is most affected, Chhattisgarh, has seen an increase in violence between Maoist rebels and villagers who are supported by the government.

2007
Fighting continued between Naxalite Maoists and government security forces throughout the year. The majority of hostilities took place in Chhattisgarh, which turned especially deadly when over 400 Naxalites attacked a Chhattisgarh police station, seizing arms and killing dozens. Civilians are now wedged between joining the Maoist insurgence or supporting the Salwa Judum and face coercion from both sides.
In November 2007 reports emerged that anti-SEZ (Special Economic Zone) movements such as the Bhoomi Uchched Pratirodh Committee in Nandigram in West Bengal, which have arisen after the land appropriation and human displacement following the SEZ Act of 2005, have joined forces with the Naxalites since February to keep the police out; the reports quoted unnamed intelligence sources.[30] Recently, police found weapons belonging to Maoists near Nandigram.

2008
Civilians were most affected in the ongoing fighting between Maoist rebels and government security forces. Of the 16 states touched by this conflict, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand were the most affected. One positive note for Chhattisgarh was that fatalities, although still high, were significantly down from 2007. Similarly, Andhra Pradesh, the state with the most Maoist activity a few years ago, has improved security with a corresponding drop in fatality rates. Unfortunately, as conditions have improved in Chhattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh, the Maoist forces seem to have shifted their operations to the state of Orissa where conditions have worsened.

2009
In September 2009 India's Prime Minister Manmohan Singh admitted that the Maoists had growing appeal among a large section of Indian society, including tribal communities, the rural poor as well as sections of the intelligentsia and the youth. He added that "Dealing with left-wing extremism requires a nuanced strategy - a holistic approach. It cannot be treated simply as a law and order problem." In the first half of 2009, 56 Maoist attacks have been reported.

2010
In February 2010 24 paramilitary personnel of the Eastern Frontier Rifles were killed in the Silda camp attack, an operation the guerillas stated was the beginning of "Operation Peace Hunt", the Maoist answer to the government "Operation Green Hunt" that was recently launched against them.
On 6 April 2010, Naxalite rebels killed 76 Indian soldiers in a series of attacks on security convoys in Dantewada district in the central Indian state of Chattisgarh. The attack resulted in the biggest loss of life security forces have suffered since launching a large-scale offensive against the rebels.
On 17 May 2010, a Naxalite landmine destroyed a bus in Dantewada district, killing up to 44 people including several Special Police Officers (SPOs) and civilians.

Human toll

The first combat deaths of the insurgency were in 1980. The highest number of incidents of violence has taken place in four worst-affected states—Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa—where 2,212 people lost their lives from January 2006 to August 2009.

Around 1,100 people are known to have died during 2009. The number includes 600 civilians, 300 security personnel and 200 rebels.

There were more than 40,000 displaced people in 2006.

According to the Institute of Peace and Conflict studies, Naxal groups have recruited children in different capacities and exposed them to injury and death however the same accusation has been levelled at the state-sponsored Salwa Judum anti-Maoist group, and Special Police officers (SPOs) assisting the government security forces.

Deaths related to violence
From the Ministry of Home Affairs it has been stated that:

1996: 156 deaths
1997: 428 deaths
1998: 270 deaths
1999: 363 deaths
2000: 50 deaths
2001: 100+ deaths
2002: 140 deaths
2003: 451 deaths
2004: 500+ deaths
2005: 700+ deaths
2006: 750 deaths
2007: 650 deaths
2008: 794 deaths
2009: 1,134 deaths

According to the BBC, more than 6,000 people have died during the rebels' 20-year fight.
 
Last edited:

Oracle

New Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
8,120
Likes
1,566
Yes, GoI should not only use the services of the Indian Army, but also the Indian Air Force if required.

GoI says that we do not want to use the IA against our own people. Then what is the IA doing in and NE for decades? Are the terrorists in NE not Indians? Double standards huh!
 

Iamanidiot

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
5,325
Likes
1,504
insurgency near borders means flow of arms.Naxals can be eleminated through development infrastructure and Human resources.Andhra did it thats the only method possible
 

AkhandBharat

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2009
Messages
542
Likes
79
insurgency near external borders requires army not so in central india
If the insurgency grows to 6 indian states and kills nearly 1000 people each year, its blatantly obvious that the problem cannot be contained by talks and or the use of paramilitary and police forces.
 

ahmedsid

Top Gun
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Likes
252
The Maoists are basically Indians, and Not Afghanis and Pakistanis being filtered in to fight India from an External Border. Hence you cant Equate them to the Issue elsewhere.

But that aside, I say its high time the IAF is brought into tackle this menace. Attack Choppers witht UAVs can do damage to the Naxals, their logistics, their supply lines. That should be the First stage, after that, if deemed necessary, the Indian Army should be brought in, but I feel at this moment, better equipped Para Military forces along with IAF can destroy this menace in a year or two if done earnestly, and this should be coupled with Developmental work, not just Bombings and killings of Maoists. The people should have no incentive to harbour these goons, basically the people should understand the war is against the Goons and Poverty.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top