Search results

Chutiye ho Kya be?? Bhai Tere dimaag me kuchh jaata bhi hai Kya ya angrezi nhi samjh aa rhi??? Ye location POK ke andar hai iss baat ko apne bheje me daal le, video shoot ki location ki baat nhi Kar rha "jahan plane crash hua uski baat kr rha".

If you still have a doubt about location, you can see paki army rushing towards the crash site in a Bell-Jet Ranger just after the crash.

Noob :p, by the way the place where this bird is falling is inside POK, near Charhoi to be exact by georefencing. Now don't tell me Ghaffora is hiding this SU-30 wreckage in his ass.

Mig 29k are carrier borne jets operated by navy, IAF operates the UPG fighters.

America didn't say anything regarding counting of F-16's. Pentagon declined that there was some official counting of F-16's. It's time you update your general knowledge.

Yes, obviously you won't be able to see a clear image of the F-16 or the Mig-21, you will only be able to see the flame of the former and the smoke tail of the latter on such a poor resolution image.

Well there you go, if you know what I mean.

Tell me Mr. Analyst what do you conclude from this video?

Are you nuts?? Do you not understand what I am trying to say or I am just banging my head on the wall?? The DJISPR of Pakistatan mentioned in his very first tweet that he has captured 3 Indian pilots. Later changed that statement to 2 pilots then to one pilot. Now the million dollar question...

Looks like you didn't get what I meant to say. I am repeating again " After official release of radar signatures of downed F-16 by IAF, which argument carries more weight according to you?? YouTube video or official radra data??"

So you mean to say that you would be more interested in amateur YouTube low resolution videos as proof rather than official radar signature and voice overs???

Nope it won't!!! It will only lower the credibility of IAF on quoting third party sources as proof of something which they achieved on their own.

About that article, it has already been discussed on the previous posts of this thread so no point in spamming. Regarding the video analysis, why the hell on Earth do you think that IAF will officially do an analysis of third party videos taken by un-named sources to prove their claim?? They...

Why do you think that IAF would show these third party videos to strengthen their claims?? They already showed the radar images, they also revealed the intercepted voice. Also nothing has been put forward by the pakis which explains their failed narrative, they simply quoted an article of...

IAF said in their press conference that have multiple ir-refutbale proofs that they shot down an F-16 but can't share all of them because of security reasons. This article is baseless like the Lara Seligman one, that so called defence journo doesn't even know how an IR seeker based missile...

Those radar signatures were from PHALCON AWACS of IAF.

Dude, are you serious right now? Do you even know how AWACS work?? If you don't then please stops bullshitting.

The thing is your government won't release any radar signatures, won't show HUD data of the kill, they will just produce bullshit kill patches to support their claim. That's the best they can do to support their fake narratives and your awaam seems all fine with them. @Arsalan123

Okk, whatever floats in your boat.

Why waste time in talking when we know your GOI already knows your government won't do shit.