Search results

The term independence means independence from India not from Pakistan. Independent Kashmir is POK. There is no Kashmiri left in Pakistani Occupied Kashmir, all are either Pathan or Punjabis. The same will be done to Kashmiris in Srinagar if it becomes independent Kashmir.

India is a country of tradition and civilisation. No matter how high the income group may reach, there will be conflict of values. How does it matter, whether PRC is assisting or Pakistan is doing that alone. What alone matters is India has no assistance, no resources to counter it. Unless...

It is not possible in democracy where every one is free to say anything it wants. It creates unrest! And how cleverly Pakistan made GB a new province is commendable job. Where as due to internal freedom of haramkhori India is still trying to have some hold on it's citizen. Thanks to bastard...

Make Pakistan army busy in dealing with menance in POK. Than letting them making Indian army busy in Indian administered territory. Pak has successfully diverted IAs resource in COIN , CT ops which are defensive.

This means in a conflict you are more prone to loss than Pakistan. Because you have economy and other developments to lose.

Now you are weak because you have some economy to safeguard. And this is why I say, create buffer , create buffer, crate buffer and create buffer.

I have already made a post that India lacks resources and proper management of them. India can do a just little more if the resources are managed correctly. Those who are saying India should do this that etc I tell to them, we dont have money to counter both China and Pak. And only fools would...

Time for analysis is gone. Sent from my SM-T211 using Tapatalk

No, as per Indian constitution first the bill has to be passed in state assembly and then parliament. This is for any state not just kashmir

China will come in support of Pakistan. and even if there is a strong case, china will veto in UNSC. So its a dead end. Sent from my SM-T211 using Tapatalk

You know what, india does not have that much of resources and money to do all this. This is a bitter truth. You have had many bastard leaders in the past who have led Indias tactical and strategic strike power into dust bin due to their peace loving stance with pak. They remained very introvert...

The point you raised is commendable but it is superficial. And it is one of the policies to stop china delivering tech and support to Pakistan, which comes not under open diplomacy but behind the curtains. And India has been failing in it. India has failed in containing china or blackmail china...

Bhaisab your rampuri doesnt work on time and doesnt have any affect. India should take land inch by inch everyone wants it but no one does it. We are only talkative and batuni just like our leaders. No one would take any action.

What diplomacy? China has directly supported Pakistan.. Diplomacy has failed. And by the time it succeeds, the reason for doing that diplomacy would have low importance.

Nothing.... they don't give a damn to what we say.

Hirankashhya is correct. It will be typical baniya mindset to go after Hafeez. Mardangi would be to go after those who are facilitating them. It's the Pak ISI. But then you need to fortify your house first. It would be of no use to carry such op when in return you also get hurt. Better is to do...