Search results

I have not heard any of the TD LCH being moved out of bangalore yet HAL Heli facility.... Thats why I thought it cannot be LCH but it was surely look alike

I just saw army heli flying over chd at 6:50 PM today. It had a solid resemblance with LCH. It was flying low had 4 hard points was not able to see if there was a gun but my first thought was "It cannot be LCH?" Is there any other heli being used by us resembling to lch and operated around...

Lets call it this way is it not possible for LUH to be ready by 2018 . They answer shud be it is possible by 2018. being from a aero background I understand the tedious testing process . In our case they even crashed initial A/C being made for testing(the one i worked on). So if they stick to...

@Kunal Biswas @blueblood Given the history of HAL ADA and DRDO combined with reluctance of IA and IAF to induct domestic products I had added one extra year to the proposed year of 2017. But when i revisit the points stated above my myself will not expect them to meet deadlines they have set...

Kindly share the source for detailed information if available. Units are not only meant for IA but will also be available to friendly nations across the globe so that 200 might go even higher reducing the cost per heli . . 5 Years for what LUH ??? Kindly share the source. I read it to be ready...

So I can assume that this is nothing serious and no ego clashes and all will be taking place on this issue..... Is IAF okay with navy wing? As some of the articles say they were earlier not happy but now they are good... When is the deal for apache going to take place any deadline given?

some post like Army scores major win over IAF, gets Apache gunships raises questions specially the title.... major win..... these are only sources I have to make my point of view.....

Ray sir the question here is was this a issue between IA and IAF? as some say that IAF was not hapy with this? Is it true?wat was it all about?

LOL ,,,Is that possible ???:laugh::laugh::laugh::rofl::rofl:

Agreed as there confusion due to it at the time of kargil aswell.... but our defense forces have always been like that competing with each other instead of complimenting each other... with more power going n the hands of army chief Airforce chief will be not happy.... Though its better for...

Just to add to it..... I dont deny Apache is a completely different machine than our LCH or Rudra and we do need them by yes the day when the time will come to choose a Light heli will come our defense forces will surely run to find a fault in them and thus leading to a foreign toy.... Sad...

By that we can assume that .... But as fas as the air power is concerned IAF always wanted it to be in there hands .... In addition to it training of the Army pilots and they achieving full capability is a difficult job and given that task will be in hands of IAF i believe they will not be...

Indian Army will be very happy and satisfied with this whereas Indian Airforce will not be.... Lets wait and watch what happens there is still time.....

yeah agreed on the last point.... with that cost no to MMRCA ..... LCA and AMCA would have taken off like a rocket even with half that money.... Add more helos instead and now we do have options Indian Origin... just on that gunship point same role can be played by helos in a better form then...

Even then the losses are quite high and we are talking about wars where highly mordernised weapons were mainly used by only one side... still they ended up with huge loses.... We are in todays world no longer settling for 4th gen .... thats where I thick MRCA will fit....

Are these not an easy target for the enemy ....? In the history of wars they have been used they have been mostly lost during the war.... referring to there role in Soviet Afghan or Iraq Iran war...