Search results

enough with your constant black pilling routine.. take a break....

awkward ergonomics ? neither here nor there. will need to see a few more pics. - user neither sitting cross legged nor laying flat on the belly. - user supposed to grope for the fire switch with his right hand?

was referring to info in public domain, forces and DRDO may have their internal procedures, but the most of confusion is happening in the minds of commentators.

in absence of official explanation on how this process works, everybody is interpreting the process in their own way. official explanation is not forth coming because that information can be used to game the system. i suppose until someone puts some thought into this, to figure out a way to...

that tweet gives the impression that Whap with 30mm cannon doesn't exist..

when that post was written loitering munitions hadn't entered DFI lexicon except for that israeli one in inventory. 100 kg warhead with 50-100 km range, speed at about 1 km a sec, rockets have advantages over loitering munitions. if i remember correctly, i was thinking along these lines for...

similar idea, different method

of the big guns that are made in the country, the barrels are manufactured in only two places, OFB and Kalyani. no matter who makes the gun, kalyani revenue is partially secure. will have to check if they export barrels. this is to say, baba kalyani is the trend setter, he got into defence...

to take opinions from social media seriously, one needs to give them time for dopamine rush to settle down.

i would suggest, don't let missing tile syndrome be the primary driver of your thought process. other ways to look at this, total requirement is for 5000 SMP, still another 4000 to be procured, by splitting the tender ASMI got 50% chance to get selected. now it's for ASMI and LMT to prove...

nope, two tenders, here is one of them for 550. https://www.tendersontime.com/india/details/9-x-19mm-machine-pistol-quantity-required-550-58abe79/

so what happened here, by issuing two tenders for same category, IA managed to support domestic design and at the same time given itself a chance to do comparative analysis between two designs in field conditions? and the day is near where we don't have to make storm trooper jokes anymore.

we don't know if DAP categorisations of IDDM is applicable for this tender by IAF since CFT is a dual use technology/equipment.

take into consideration the possibility that these photos are appearing on SM because NATO wallahs want russians to notice them. ultimately it will boil down to one question in the future, if nato wallahs insist on highlighting this. NATO durbari brigade : India has not supported ukraine...

components developed domestically don't vanish if a project doesn't go thru. institutional learnings will get transferred to the next iteration of development in that category. that's how R&D works. absorb this point, so that you don't get stuck on this point.

usually their MIC won't miss a chance to get a tag of battle-tested tech, let's wait and see.

XM-7 spider

any feedback from ukraine on these?

let there be news about ASLV's performance in the desert first, then comes the chopping and retrofit part. it's for ASLV to prove it's worth, in the eyes of the forces. if they approve of it, we will know soon enough one way or the other. but recon vehicles are usually smaller and lighter.

these days, if IA manages to make up their mind on what exactly they want, there is enough domestic industrial capacity to cater to their requirements. both the vehicle platforms and equipment options are available within DPSU and private sector to cook up a range of options for IA to choose...