Search results

well, it is so simply because China skipped the deployment of the 3G birds(F4/mig23),when CHina fell into the chaoes of Culture Revelution(1966-1976). J8II,China's counterpart to F4/mig23,is a half-failure like LCA.Chinese started devleoping J8 in later 1960s,but J8 did not get mature until...

haha,yes. j10 and su30,su350are 3G birds. french 3g is,sitting ducks against chinese 3g like j11/j10/s30/su35. again,french 4g refale is sitting duck against chinese 4g like j20. haha

those are special sensors for missle lauching test,,,,which can be seen on F35 tesing missle-lauching.

the ass of J20

【56城事拍客-成都】歼20首秀超低空垂直爬升 地面短距起飞 -原创视频 在线观看 视频下载-56网视频 taking-off of J20

J20 being tested J20 being tested

it seems that you know exactly that USA could not invade Cuba ,as long as Soviet didn't collapse.....so do Taiwan and USA. Taiwan still stands there,just because of the support from USA....Without the support of USA, PRC could crack down Taiwan just as easily as one elephant cracks down one ant.

well, do you know why Cuba still stand by USA for over 50 years?

50 years? in 10 years, you will find that the whole world but USA will get down on their kneels and suck the **** of CHIna.:mad2:

http://www.cannews.com.cn/2011/0428/115343.html

The chief engineer of J20 rewared 1.5 million RMB. Yang Wei, the chief engineer of J20 was recently rewarded 1.5 million RMB(about 10.5 million RUPEES) ,for his contribution on China's aircraft industry. Yang Wei is not only the chief engineer of J20,but also the one of JF17 and J10B.

perhaps he doesn't believe that China-made "copied " bullet can not kill indian soldiers.

well, it is a paper,reposted from CD. it is about the research of J20's supersonic crusing

well, guy, indeed you know litttle about the industry outside India. it is the offical website of ZPMC, one Chinese companies most odinary people never hear of ,including CHinese . but it makes 85% of seaport heavy engineering facilities,including cranes. http://www.zpmc.com/index.html...

well, in a word, India is missing another shift of global manufacturing. After WWII, there were 3 shift of manufacturing in the world. the first one took place in 1950s-early 1960s, labour-intensive manufacturing shifted from N.America/west europe to Japan, and helped Japan finish...

well, guy,frankly speaking, the products of those companies really can hardly be known outside India. Protected by heavy tarrif and quotas, India's companie are usually lack of competitiveness in international market, just as pet birds protected by cages can not competite those wild bird...

locomotive: frankly speaking, the fastest highspeed trains already proves that CHinese railway/trains tech already in the leading league in the world. At least, china-made locomotives are not less advanced than that made in EU and Japan and many countries including USA are inducting CHinese...

you know little about the industry base of CHina..... almost all of FDI are invested on light industry such as toys,textile ,household appliance and electronics and particular heavy industry such as cars. FDI play little role of the heavy industry in CHina,such as steel,electric...

well ,nobody wants to revise "great leap" here at all. Mao's economy policy is unsustainable and uneconomic. nobody here wants to resume it. but Mao's economic policy is quite difference with Chinese economy during Mao era. you obviously are confused at it.