Search results

In buddhism violence is prohibited. That is why buddhism is degradation of dharma. It is said that the spirit of dharma himsa was destroyed by buddhism in India leading to poor resistance against Islamic invasion. Buddhism= Dharma-himsa

Linguistic forensic clearly states that sinhala was a mix of pali + tamil + Sanskrit. So, sinhala did change not because of evolution but because of buddhism spread by ashoka and consequently mixing of languages. Tamils, both in India and lanka weren't interested in buddhism. Why is something I...

I too have been saying the same. Numbers don't matter. Righteousness does. By declaring that sinhala is right instead of accepting a more neutral language by dual language policy, things would have remained cordial. Why impose sinhala on Tamils when they never were politically active or causing...

Lankan were probably originally tamilians along with some migrants from India. Sinhalese betrayed their identity. Sinhalese are traitors. Just because Rohingya come to lanka and produce 10 children to become majority, will you accept sinhala as minority?

Sanskrit and tamil haven't changed or gone extinct. That justification is cheap. Sinhala changed their language and need to change back again. Who have preserved the identity have more value than people with artificial identity

Don't you think Sinhala is a corrupt language and culture? Don't you you see that earlier Lanka was hindu and spoke Sanskrit or other Indian languahe. How do you think Rama communicated with Ravana/Vibheeshana? The foolish people gave up their culture and language and became Sinhala. Don't you...

The difference between tamil nadu and lanka is goo little to say they were not indigenous. It is actually strange that sinhala became a language at all considering it is an impure mix of Sanskrit + Pali + Tamil

Sinhala is not a pure and original language. Why should anyone speak it is a question

That is what I am saying. If Sinhalese stop voting Rajapaksa type anti tamil president, Sri Lanka will have a decent govt. Tamils are not insane people who want everyone who is not a tamil dead. Tamils in Lanka only want peace which Sinhalese themselves spoil by voting Rajapaksa. If Sinhalese...

Wrongs must be compensated or punished. There is no cut off date to differentiate past from present. Evil is evil. It is not their country. God didn't gift them the land. They were no different than Tamils there. Tamils are not invaders like muslims. It is just like treating jains and sikhs...

Had sinhala people not did sinhala only policy and kicked out tamil from school and office, there would have been no violence. One should understand that lanka and tamil nadu were close since ancient times and it was obvious that there would be tamils in lanka. Sinhala itself is tamil+pali+Sanskrit.

The majority of sri lanka are a scumbag who vote for rajapaksa. So, what can anyone do about that? Sinhalese have forced Tamils into a conundrum. What was the point of antagonising Tamils who were pretty harmless?

There is nothing wrong with saying what is the truth. Where were police or army during 1971 genocide of hindus? Where were they in 1990 kashmir genocide? State has lost its credibility. There is no point in being lawful. The constitution itself was not legitimate

Exactly, that is why Modi is feared. The only proper riot that decisively defeated them. But that is not enough. There was no major organised war

It was our ancestors fault to not wage a war for Hindu country like Muslims did for Pakistan. Hindus never fought for hindu country but always followed slave mentality of 'swami nishta' to any swami available. Nehru was not a leader of the people and there was no need to even accept him. The...