Search results

Congratulations Sir, very persuasive & spellbinding piece. Do let us know when this is published. @Julian any thoughts ?

@Pratap, you said that Stephen Knapp is one of those unbiased, Western historians who refute OIT. Please elaborate.

What does Stephen Knapp has to say, basically ? Does it validate what Pratap says, or nullifies it ?

@Pratap Can you discuss each of the points mentioned (in Bold, underlined) below, with ample pictorial evidences ?

Pratap, stop being the proverbial cry-baby of DFI & admit that you do not possess an iota of knowledge about history, literature, genetics, debate & decency. @Mad Indian is trained-medico (in short, a DOCTOR) & @A chauhan is an experienced lawyer by profession. They know what they are talking...

@Pratap If you read this: Early India: From the origins to the AD 1300, it says: 1) Indo-European and Indo-Aryan are language labels, but in the nineteenth century these were also incorrectly used as racial labels and this confusion persists. The correct usage should be "Indo-European-speaking...

& @mikhail is WB, as well.