Search results

Folks have no idea what is going on... It was a great conspiracy but IAF intelligently settled the dust.. Really?

================ Deleted at Request ==================

If it will be in media by some journos... Like they are bashing out LCA on behalf of IAF with their own words, many guys are still took those articles as a backup data. But we all know that it was nothing more than a paid campaign..

Let me give an example which may be related to your core interest. Have you ever expect to Arjun mk3 to be a amphibious tank which can float on water? Or To install heavy turret over bmp-2 with 120mm smoothbore cannon?

I'm in favour of NLCA as a tech demonstrator for forthcoming N-AMCA and a good choice (NLCA MK2) for shore based ops. And as far as baked news are concerned, the motivate our forum folks to think over those over ambitious claims including decorated member. Here, we can share whatever is...

But what can we do when some ambitious journos publish those over-hyped glossy articles which become base for all kind of shit..

Already stated the same... => I can assure you about that. its only upto you to believe else get ready for Aero india 2018 and ask the same with officials Thats what I call overhyped and non-feasible desires. Reason already elaborated.

The pic was released by assuming R-73 as standard WVR missile. If IAF demand to have BVR on outer pylons than it is possible to configure them for BVR (only for Derby not Astra) but it is not & never demanded. bcoz if you check any mission profile WVR will be on priority. For a solo mission, no...

Already shared by @Kunal Biswas but stil vijyes is unable to understand the same weapon configuration should be potent , economic and very much suitable for mission. No one can't use BVR mission in close combats ( specially within 10kms). before raising you question you need to understand the...

This configuration is meant for air superiority.. This is what I said many times that there are various munition requirements for various type of missions. Weapon configuration always planned according to the mission type.

I don't know, what you are talking about.. If you are concerned with chinese J-7s, than you should know that china already retired most of the older airframes and the jets which are still in service were duly delivered between 1990-2003. I don't think that any of the professional air force...

Its typo, And its already mentioned in the text I quoted there.. isn't it? Check it out again :yo:

Not really compared with A-10.. But it can can carry Armaments of upto 300kgs.. whereas A-10 can carry 7000+ kgs https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/indo-uk-made-new-hawk-combat-aircraft-looks-to-take-on-china/articleshow/56990382.cms HTFE is another side story to increase the indigenous...

Soon you guys have to start a new thread with heading "MRCA" as government is looking forward for more players in the game by removing Single Engine clause. Along with this Dassault's LCA modification offer is also under consideration (not accepted yet). Conference rooms in MoD are too hot and...

Production of anything more than the demand is always a bad idea and there is no need to produce 1lc of LCAs. Hence, it will nothing more than a stupidity to increase the production capacity to reach that level. As of now, I can assure you that LCA is not going anywhere and you'll see them in...

Another big mouth words. :blah: According to you, no one is capable in the world.:confused1: Nobody underestimated India but here you have your own overestimated dreams. I expect you to be one of 0.1% otherwise it will be sad. Anyways, we already knew that even best have scope for...

.

Most probably, Dassault will be requested for wing folding which is not asked till now. They are not yet certified for that but both Boeing and Dassault will be invited to show off their STOBAR skill at SBTF,Goa. @Kshithij

In between MII Rafales will be considerably cheaper than imported Rafales because here we will pay them in INR (to DRAL) and the cost of imported Rafales was already shared on Rafale's thread. Anyways, the flyaway cost of single seater Rafale costs around 91 Million USD and two seater variant...

As I said (and its nothing new) that IAF want RAFALEs in large numbers (nearly 100) and its also quite clear that IAF is unhappy with LM F-16s for some valid reasons. Hence, they are trying blackmail MoD with LCA Tejas to get more RAFALEs which is quite easier to get as DRAL promised to deliver...