Search results

Doesn't DRDO has established a foundry for GaA, the soon they are able to produce military grade GaN, they will establish one for GaN. IISc was for commercial market, though rejecting is a pure shortsightedness. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

This thread started up, tejas vs single engine fighter. One member continued his theory to prove that tejas is not in league of this tender. In the end it ended up tejas as single engine MRCA option. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

That also means that J20 can't detect AMCA either. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

SANT instead of HELINA, flight performance such as sustained flight envelope for long time, it's an LCA not mca to perform that mission. Interception, CAS are the best roles for LCA than being a multirole at same time. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

Mkis will get escort jammer from DARE. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

GEF414 gives 8 kN of additional thrust at afterburner than GEF404IN20 with similar dimensions. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

When burned on full steam. Not on dry. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

Wrong assumption, the tw will increase and so as dry thrust, it will be more efficient than GEF404 Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

LCA mk1 has 10kN thrust more than Gripen C/D. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

Forget Gripen, single engine deal isn't going any where, the proposed fighter has yet to get ioc, and IAF won't induct Gripen E as requirement suggests registering 2000hrs of flight by the proposed fighter. Only F16 full fills that but again single vendor favoring situation arises. And worst for...

Yes tejas is an LCA and will never be a MMRCA, but it does have provision of flying with dual racks, we will get more clearer picture of weaponry once Indian weapons getting operational with it, it is capable enough of defending against PLAAF(technologically+training) but can't replace an MMRCA...

Actually you are correct, Naval mk2 has all those specs, not the air force mk2. Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

LCA MK1=>13.5 TONS Gripen E=>10 Hard points(9+1)with 5200tons of payload external Gripen E mtow=> 16.5 tons GripeN E intro=>not before 2027 if deal cracks next year(impossible due to elections) Tejas mk2=>2027 deadline not timeline by Air force. Tejas mk2 mtow=>16.5 tons Hard points=> 8(7+1)...

Exactly he made the SE fiasco. Gripen when comes take off weight, doesn't suits as an MRCA, it is far less than the competitors, even LCA type aircrafts fall in that category, F16 is only option but given the most advance F16 shot down, IAF certainly not looking at the outdated Airframe. Sent...

It won't come, as LM has stayed away when navy sent them RFI for deck based aircraft, they avoided to respond, now come F35 its only a someone's dream and nothing else. F35 won't be offered to India even if India signs the other two contract. And if India gets F35, her capabilities will be...

First We are partnering for PMF, and it's not dying. The project is termed as classified by Air chief BS Dhanoa Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

Sir what's the source for Gripen E in Brazil airforce in 2019 Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

SE MMRCA at current is turning to be a single vendor situation(with little to no competition ) , as far as Gripen is concerned, Gripen E won't be coming before 2023(For Swedish Airforce only) , while the current Gripen is an LCA. And Bl70 does stands in the mind with no prototype to demonstrate...

Nah in Defence sector, have they moved to X band, from C and L Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk

Do you know the status of Indian GaN technology Sent from my Aqua Ace II using Tapatalk