Search results

Many methods are used to add stealth. Shape, Skin Material, RAM coating etc. Composite falls in second category and adds to stealth.

One of the theory is that Su 30 MKI could not shoot down F-16 because it wanted to come close to F-16 to bring it in no escape Zone. F-16 fired AMRAM from far distance and none of the 5 missiles could hit Su 30 MKI.

Let us not discuss JF 17. It is a shit plane and its maker has not deployed it. It has a rejected design. Made of Mattel, No modern avionics, No good weapons including A2 A missiles, substandard radar and substandard engine. substandard flight control system algorithm. Good for bombing civilian...

A very special type of composite is under development which is very light and has high strength and batter stealth, It will go into making of MWF skin.

Give order of 4 Squadron. subsequent should be with atleast frontal stealth.

Since this was our first plane, proper optimization of design could not be done and as a result, some sub optimization remained in design which is taken care in MK1A to some extent. Drag wave issue, larger wing, air intake issue remained. They try to solve it.

Actually, I do not respond to him but while quoting him, I did not read the Avtar name and hence did the mistake.

What is fanboyism in that. This is a fact. When we accidently fired Brahmmos, None of the Pakistan radar can detect it. They only knew about that when the debries landed in Pakistan. It seems that you have a very high regards for substandard Chinese weapon.

But what if it provides performance similar to PESA Radar? What is the benefit when your opponents have far superior radars and see you much before you can see them and shoot a BVR at you?

We have tested 6 Aircrafts in MMRCA. Except Mig 35 (29), all the planes had very good electronics. We should study them and see how the data can be presented in most easy to understand and use manner. Rafale has great electronics so probably it will have excellent sensor fusion and presentation...

Chinese AESA is air cooled , which clearly indicated less power consumption and hence weak. You rightly said that data are confidential but there are other indications. Chinese radars even can not ditect Brahmos or Iranian missiles fared on Pakistan.

Even if Derby is tested, Integration of I derby should not be a big issue as the source codes will be by and large similar in both the missiles.

It is not only BVR but BVR and Radar combo which determines the range. You rightly say that PL 15 will be useless until its radar can detect Tejas Mk1. Poor quality of Chinese AESA which is air cooled and exaggerated PL15 shall not be effective against Tejas as Tejas will detect JF 17 from far...

I am sorry.My mistake. I misread it as South korean FA50.

Most of the things are true except EW. Spectra is far superior. It Jams the Radar of F16, Su35, Jf17 etc and can jam most of the radars.

Far inferior to Tejas.

The Russian fighter pilot who had flown Tejas had said that he would like to see Tejas fighting with Su 30 in an exercise.

EJ 200's new engine is designed for 72 KN dry and 116 KN afterburner. The ptoposed engine offers marginal improvement over it.

Atleast, MWF has exceeded Gripen C/D in MTOW and Payload. It has an excellent maneuverability but if we are able to put 75/125 KN engine, it will an @$$ kicking fighter which will defeat any plane in neighborhood in even dog fight. 75/125 KN engine is almost equivalent to AL31 of MKI with...

MKI will have an upper edge because of TVC engine. However, in BVR combat, Scenario will be different. Once the MKI is made Super MKI, the scenario will change. MWF will detect MKI from far greater distance than MKI can detect MWF. MWF will have first look first shoot advantage.