Search results

You don't need money to colonise and demographically turn a nation into your culture's orbit. False equivalency. I am in favour of indosphere. For that, we need immigration to foreign lands & strong legal ties back to motherland. That is irrelevant re: having an aggressive or passive posture...

You absolute retard, its not slavery under every single goddamn ethnos and as an Indian, i do not mind the idea of being vassals to motherland. Thats the point. We ALSO want an Indosphere and thats how you get it,mr smartypants.

they got to be anglos & anglo vassals by not being retards re: immigration to those lands and keeping dual citizenship or similar ties with motherland. Something that retards here think is wrong.

This attitude is very good eg of why Indian disaspora is bigger than the Chinese but punches far below the chinese in power. Because Indians have a very retarded view towards immigration.

Funny how all the major countries in the world don't think this way, eh ? . Your disagreement is counter to facts.

No one is being lied to. I can still choose one country if i hve to choose between my two dual citizenship nations- which only ever happens if they are AT WAR with each other. No one is saying India's position isnt known, we are saying India's position is not optimal moving forward and needs...

One main reason being dual citizenship. China effectively offers it.

No. Not Always. Oaths of allegiences come in many varieties- they do not come explicit with renouncing allegiences with other countries in case of Canada, for eg- it only asks that you put Canada first in time of war(a fair ask, which every nation **SHOULD** ask). Except Israel & Israelis do...