- Joined
- Oct 13, 2015
- Messages
- 7,494
- Likes
- 17,198
Sir, that's what i am suggesting expand these strikes to hit Asad.Sir, as far as I know, those are only for Russian bases in Syria, not for Syrians or minor Russian presence
Sir, that's what i am suggesting expand these strikes to hit Asad.Sir, as far as I know, those are only for Russian bases in Syria, not for Syrians or minor Russian presence
Can't be said much, wait to see some more reports, but it is known that Saudis do supply money, CIA does there bidding, but the interesting bit is that both countries our twisting each other arms.
An interesting bit I wanted to share was, US sent troop to Afghanistan not to invade but capture the opium fields, as the drugs are being transported by military cargo planes to supply there big pharma companies and medicos, as the US medical industry is currently ranked 1 in drug manufacturing.
- Saudis threatened the US gov. to not pass the 911 congress bill, which is clear that funding was provided by Saudis.
- CIA has there own agenda to topple Saudis as they are under huge debt, there economic growth is getting stale now.
- Saudis also threaten to loosen up prices of Oil, this directly threatens the US dollar dominance.
Well, duh.Does that mean the chemical attack to kill children was done by Saudis/CIA.
Speaking of narco trafficking, the US has a major hand in this business, in Latin america too, in spite of the so called "War on Drugs."Can't be said much, wait to see some more reports, but it is known that Saudis do supply money, CIA does there bidding, but the interesting bit is that both countries our twisting each other arms.
An interesting bit I wanted to share was, US sent troop to Afghanistan not to invade but capture the opium fields, as the drugs are being transported by military cargo planes to supply there big pharma companies and medicos, as the US medical industry is currently ranked 1 in drug manufacturing.
- Saudis threatened the US gov. to not pass the 911 congress bill, which is clear that funding was provided by Saudis.
- CIA has there own agenda to topple Saudis as they are under huge debt, there economic growth is getting stale now.
- Saudis also threaten to loosen up prices of Oil, this directly threatens the US dollar dominance.
I was about to post this. Good job.April 6, exactly one century ago on this very day, the US entered WWI. Interesting coincidence.
So how will Russia respond? It seems the Russians were informed in advance and no Russian assets we're hit, but was this something Putin would appreciate?
Is this just a one-off strike to shake off the detractors in the US, or has Trump succumbed to the neocon agenda?Well, duh.
They've done this type of shit before.
They are readying themselves to take a piece of the syrian pie.
PS: @pmaitra : Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. #Trump
Well, he has said that before, the US didn't give a shit.Vladimir Putin: "US attack on Syria is an aggression against a sovereign State, in violation of international law, and under false pretenses,"
The detractors don't shake off after tasting blood. I think it is the latter.Is this just a one-off strike to shake off the detractors in the US, or has Trump succumbed to the neocon agenda?
I hope not. Let the Shia sentiments rise. It is not in Russia's interest to get bogged down in Syria. One has to keep ego aside in such circumstances. Yes, Putin looks weak, but I am fine with that. We don't need two hot headed nuclear powers.Well, he has said that before, the US didn't give a shit.
I hope Putin escalates.
You are correct. They will demand more in the future.The detractors don't shake off after tasting blood. I think it is the latter.
Well, he has said that before, the US didn't give a shit.
I hope Putin escalates.
I hope not. Let the Shia sentiments rise. It is not in Russia's interest to get bogged down in Syria. One has to keep ego aside in such circumstances. Yes, Putin looks weak, but I am fine with that. We don't need two hot headed nuclear powers.
Well, yeah maybe you re right.I hope not. Let the Shia sentiments rise. It is not in Russia's interest to get bogged down in Syria. One has to keep ego aside in such circumstances. Yes, Putin looks weak, but I am fine with that. We don't need two hot headed nuclear powers.
As of now, it seems a one off well calculated move with signals to both internal and external actors.Is this just a one-off strike to shake off the detractors in the US, or has Trump succumbed to the neocon agenda?