sorcerer
Senior Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
- Messages
- 26,919
- Likes
- 98,471
We read unbiased news paperHow do you know?
We read unbiased news paperHow do you know?
I'll refrain from sermonizing when people stop using the deaths of three innocent people to level unsubstantiated accusations in this thread.I am an Indian, and my country is a victim of Pakistan sponsored terrorism for the last several decades. I have seen the blood and gore when multiple trains were bombed in Mumbai. I was on my way home, and could have been dead, or maimed, like than man whose leg has been blown off.
If I shower all the accolades to you for being the most balanced, composed, and politically correct participant in this thread, and accept that I am biased, would you please refrain from sermonizing others?
So the only unbiased newspapers are the ones that will make references to Pakistan regarding this tragedy, without any proof?We read unbiased news paper
Yes, and it could also be an Indian as well.It could also be a Han.
We should not speculate.
Using deaths of three people to level unsubstantiated accusation? Where? Go read the post you quoted, again; yes, the one that "reeks of bias." That second paragraph was a general comment, and yes, what I said is the truth. Most terrorists are somehow linked to Pakistan. Is speaking the truth a sign of bias? Maybe to you, and if so, so be it.I'll refrain from sermonizing when people stop using the deaths of three innocent people to level unsubstantiated accusations in this thread.
Look, Edwina, since when has China endorsed terrorism against India?
If you want to call that 'playing politics', then the US is even more guilty of it than China is...
Yes.it is..Thanks for asking the right question.So the only unbiased newspapers are the ones that will make references to Pakistan regarding this tragedy, without any proof?
there is something called past history.How do you know?
The Saudi guy in detention may not be involved. I do not think they would have been that dumb to be anywhere near the blast site when indeed the blast was remotely triggered. He must have just panicked, especially when he began drawing attention.Since it is a Saudi, it would be brushed up under the carpet as Saudi is a US ally.
Hint: 19 of the 9/11 Dudes were Saudis!
@W.G.Ewald
What do you think Sir?
what proof you want. newyork bomber ahmed shezad was paki,So the only unbiased newspapers are the ones that will make references to Pakistan regarding this tragedy, without any proof?
bloody pakis .should be kicked off from US soilLook at this:
RIP to the deceased !
Who is the enemy of the USA? Al-Qaida and its supporters i.e. people who fund such organizations, people from the middle-east countries, specially Pakistanis who not only fund but train such terrorists..
Sad to see the blasts, will be happy to see Pak links and sanctions imposed, wait... sorry, not Pak-links but middle-east links as someone is objecting it, so lets broaden the area of suspicion.
People who are opposing the possibility of Pak-links are responsible for the delayed justice, such people slow down the investigation and decision making process even after seeing the history of terror attacks and evidences.
You know what my Mum said when she saw the news on TV ? she said "why these Pakistanis are bombing the world !" while she hates news channels and politics and only watches TV serials. Now see it's a common perception towards Pakistan and Pakistanis that they are terrorists.
its a generalized opinionReported for blatant racism.
No doubt about that. Nobody else has used that kind of terror tool so extensively in recent times. So it is natural that the suspicion turns to some of the known suspects like Al Qaida and Taliban and its known supporters like Yemenis, Pakistanis.don't know about pakistan, but i think co-ordinated blast in public area is hallmark of islamic extremists in recent times.