Ok you can believe PC was foolish while I will believe PC was brave.Look mate cool down and do not get angry.What I was trying to say was since we have very few credible sources some historians have suggested that the coward Ghori had fled from the 1st battle of Tarain as he had been injured.Now it could be also that he had not fled but had been captured.Neither of us was watching a live stream of the battle on youtube so we do not know the real truth.If Prithviraj had indeed pardoned Ghori he was indeed foolish.Of course being foolish does not rule out Prithviraj was a brave warrior.The fact that he pardoned Ghori even ONCE is also disputed.However I will not go into that.Love or hate him he will remain an important figure in Indian history.Its up to you to judge him as a brave warrior or a foolish king.End of discussion.
Look you guys ... why blame Prithviraj Chauhan....
In Indian diplomacy ... there is something called Prithviraj syndrome....
India has been afflicted by that typical Hindu syndrome in dealing with the decedents (at least they claim that loudly) of Ghori and Gazani even in modern times..
In 1948, 1965, 1971 and even after Kargil Indians simply let go Pakistan.
Had Nehru allowed Army to take over entire Kashmir, we would not have had POK ??
Had Indira settled borders with Pakistan having 90,000 POW arrested in India, the problems of border with Pakistan would have been over.
Had India taken and captured POK in 1971 after liberation of Bangladesh (as some claim was the intention of Indira Gandhi who buckled under US pressure not to do so - as per CIA archives made public) - the problem would have been sorted out..
Had Bajpai allowed IA to cross over LC in J&K during Kargil, the Pakistani bluff of Nuclear strike would have been exposed.
Had Bajpai allowed Indian Army to cross over the borders during Parakram , the story of the subcontinent would be different ...
In this context why only curse Prithviraj ..... he did it long back..
your rulers are doing it even today...