Paris Terror Attack 13/11

[sorcerer]

America’s standard military solution won’t work in this situation. Russia is not Iraq, Libya, or Yugoslavia. Were the US to launch direct aggression against a country like Russia, that would be their last move ever. Therefore, the White House is trying to use radical militants from Muslim and European countries as cannon fodder. There was a time when that approach was more effective. In the mid-twentieth century, Wall Street & London’s City managed to drag Europe into a war against the Soviet Union using their protégé Hitler, whom they had literally brought to power in Germany. Today Ukraine and Syria are the theaters for America’s hot war against Russia, and the European Union is the theater for America’s economic war against Russia (it is noteworthy that while European entrepreneurs are suffering under the sanctions imposed on Russia, their American competitors are busy signing lucrative new deals with Moscow)

http://orientalreview.org/2015/11/13/grandmaster-putins-trap-2/

 

[LETHALFORCE]

If there has been a war on terror and your country has been involved for over a decade. Common sense would tell you do
Not let the other side in?

 

[sorcerer]

Many Europeans are arrogant thinking their culture will make
The refugees better more civilised people and they will integrate
And everything will be lovely. This is the bullshit they are trying
To convince themselves and others.

The European values are HARAM to Refugees and they want the civilized people to turn into barbarians to be CIVILZED in the context of refugees...
This explains the No go zones in France...the demand for Halal food etc.. They are seeing their EURPEAN VALOOS losing traction big way but are impotent to stand for their own rights in their own cuntry. (Their country will Soon be cuntry used by refugees as they deem fit.)

The European Pansies are losing ground and they dont have the ball to express their own HUMAN RIGHTS!!!!

S

 

[salute]

....................................................................

 

[Kshatriya87]

13/11 Paris Massacre: Pour Quel Profit?

Yesterday night things changed in an instant in Paris. The available evidence suggest that the assaults were carried out by a professional killer group who used live bombs among other weapons. Today’s post by Pepe Escobar on his Facebook page sheds some light on symbolism and timimg of the massacre:


Scouring a ton of reports, I found a Danish citizen describing one of the attackers to a Paris café; ultra-pro, black-clad head to toe, AK-47, very well trained. These are not your usual al-Zawahiri underwear bombers; these are precision killers. This one left the scene undisturbed, and contrary to French police, may not have been captured. He wore no suicide vest.

French intel swears they are monitoring at least 200 nationals who came back from “Syraq”. Talk about a lousy job. Paris is hyper-policed. The mind boggles thinking of at least 8 jihadis promenading at will on a Friday night dressed as pro killers.


They picked a mix of heavily symbolic venues. You have a France-German match witnessed by the President in a stadium where all barriers – ethnic, religious – dissolve, a true symbol of multiculturalism. You have a gig by an American band in a concert hall filled with young people. You have your average, cool, neighborhood cafés in the 10eme and 11eme, young, hip, secular, bobo Paris hoods.


This points to a calibrated conceptual spectrum – carefully mapped out by French insiders; perhaps those “Syraq” returnees. This also points to a monumental fail by French intel and the Ministry of Interior.


Timing: crucial. Just as the US/Brits announce they “may” have evaporated with Jihad John. And a few hours before the Vienna talks are supposed to come up with an official Top Ten terrorist list in Syria.



As always, the honest response to the question cui bono might be the last (and perhaps major) victim of the 13/11 tragedy in Paris.

Several strong voices in favor of internal false flag version have already appeared, while the weak French government and secret services totally relying on ‘American partners’ are hardly possessing enough resources to orchestrate the drama of such scale.

The underline reading of the hot-caked Stratfor report on the Paris attacks (certainly presuming undoubtful and entire Islamic State involment) suggests that the American neocons want to see a bigger French boot on the ground in Syraq. (More elaboration on NATO’s mobilization as a result of 13/11 is done by Patrick Henningsen from 21st Century Wire .) They were also not satisfied by the French resilence to fully tumble into the pan-European refugee turmoil and general public indifference to anti-Islamic provocateurs from Charlie Hebdo. The only side effect bothering Stratfor analysts is the apparent rise of Marine Le Pen which, according to them, should be nipped by setting Nikolas Sarkozy at the same electoral field.

As a matter of fact, the bloody night in Paris was launched to definitely bury the European project as it was originally seen in Paris and Berlin – economically powerful and politically sovereign concert of nations. The symbolism of attacks’ initiation near Stad du France during the France-Germany friendly match is obvious. We will not be surprised if the French investigation of the attack would discover a clear German trace of the perpetrators. The rules of the genre demand such storyline.

Very few in Europe are still taking seriously the immutable fact that the European Union allied with the Eurasian resourse base is even a bigger nightmare for the Wall Street owners than the established Russia-China alliance (please read more on the issue in our yesterday’s update Grandmaster Putin’s Trap-2). The incumbent Wall Street-controlled EU bureaucracy is rapidly loosing not only public support in the European countries (it is mauvais ton in Brussels to raise this question for long already), but of the local business elites and other power groups. Replacement of the old EU bureacracy by new representatives who would take the way of sovereignization of Europe was at the public request in the continent and seriously challenged the transatlantic partnership (didn’t you forget French trade minister Matthias Fekl threat to quit TTP talks last month?). Reinforcing the latter was the urgent task of the Wall Street political stooges on both sides of the ocean. Once the Ukrainian project factually failed and due to the notable shift in French approach towards the European Eastern policy, a foundation of the new transatlantic concensus was desperately needed. Black banner nearby Eiffel was virtually hoisted on the screens to disguide people from much more acute issues: what is the real agenda behind destabilization of the Middle East and where do the European interests rest in this regard?

So cui bono from this attack? Pour quel profit, France?


The propaganda cartoon, distributed on Saturday by the USA Today confirms the conclusions of this commentary.
http://orientalreview.org/2015/11/14/1311-paris-massacre-pour-quel-profit/

I was right in my theory then. The manipulative US hand strikes again.

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

 

[thethinker]

After seeing all these different news reports I don't think they have a clue who did this. They are just saying everything is isis
So it looks the leadership has an idea? yesterday they said Syria passports now they are saying turkish passports. The government's are clueless. Most likely french born jihad is
Returning from Syria. But don't want to scare the shit out of the public.

ISIS has taken responsibility for the attacks.

Here's the official declaration :

http://ent.siteintelgroup.com/State...ks-warns-operation-is-first-of-the-storm.html

 

[Kshatriya87]

If that gets us rid of Jihadis, then why not? I will any day select this option if it is on offer.



Americans take advantage of others' weaknesses, and their public/politicians don't ride the moral high horse. For them anything which serves their best interest is good, and everything else is "bad". Simple rules, good execution.

Our Survival is our natural right, our enemies' survival is not our concern, and we must take full liberty in selecting and using the right tools. If it means denying others the same right then so be it.

For record, I do not empathize even a bit with the French government and it's people. France is part of the block which played a role in nurturing these violent groups. Such medieval tactics do not work in 21st century, faster they realize, better for them. India must try to take advantage of such attacks to put pressure on our enemies and if situation permits, get rid of them.

Right. I concurred already. check my reply to Prince above.

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

 

[sorcerer]

If there has been a war on terror and your country has been involved for over a decade. Common sense would tell you do
Not let the other side in?

But the propaganda machinery of the wicked kind will use the Human Rights..the "compassion","Rights","liberal values" as the standard Marker of civilized society to work their own political agenda by controlling the psych of the mass in the demography you want to work with.

Common sense is not common..atleast not among the geography of Europe.

Lets seee...

USA has been trying to use Europe as a CONDOM to Enter Russia..
Kinda like a Trojan attack but purely in terms of PSY OP and the cheesiest Emotional Blackmailing way!!!
But seems like the TROJAN Condom Tore before it could reach climax....But its not....The ramming is still up , extended and perfectly timed.
Ofcourse Europe will get pregnant with Fanatics...but its okay as long as the fanatic kids can be trained to take down Russia.

 

[Kshatriya87]

America’s standard military solution won’t work in this situation. Russia is not Iraq, Libya, or Yugoslavia. Were the US to launch direct aggression against a country like Russia, that would be their last move ever. Therefore, the White House is trying to use radical militants from Muslim and European countries as cannon fodder. There was a time when that approach was more effective. In the mid-twentieth century, Wall Street & London’s City managed to drag Europe into a war against the Soviet Union using their protégé Hitler, whom they had literally brought to power in Germany. Today Ukraine and Syria are the theaters for America’s hot war against Russia, and the European Union is the theater for America’s economic war against Russia (it is noteworthy that while European entrepreneurs are suffering under the sanctions imposed on Russia, their American competitors are busy signing lucrative new deals with Moscow)

http://orientalreview.org/2015/11/13/grandmaster-putins-trap-2/

America has always used Europe as a shield. Be it world war 1 or 2. What bothers me is why don't these European fools realise that?

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

America has always used Europe as a shield. Be it world war 1 or 2. What bothers me is why don't these European fools realise that?

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

How did it use them in WW1?

US was not even a superpower till then. The Germans were fighting the British and French supremacy.

 

[sorcerer]

America has always used Europe as a shield. Be it world war 1 or 2. What bothers me is why don't these European fools realise that?

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

They are dependent on their MASTER ..USA for arms and tech in case Russia threatens them... Simple...
+
They have jumped into the Middle East Crisis...They cant isolate themselves away now...Its a FUBAR.

 

[Kshatriya87]

How did it use them in WW1?

US was not even a superpower till then. The Germans were fighting the British and French supremacy.

By the end when US intervened, they were just supplying weapons to the allies. They knew very well that both sides are losing when it comes to military power and money. So just supplying weapons and getting Europe under their debt will help whilst keeping American military and economy safe.

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

 

[spikey360]

Europe already has the cancer of modern times. Either it will win, or Europe. Impossible that both will survive.

 

[Kshatriya87]

ISIS has taken responsibility for the attacks.

Here's the official declaration :

http://ent.siteintelgroup.com/State...ks-warns-operation-is-first-of-the-storm.html

Anyone could have drafted this.

 

[thethinker]

Anyone could have drafted this.

Why not research first rather than protect an entity like IS?

Some more links good enough for you ?

#PARISBURNS: ISIS Takes TO Twitter To Gloat Over Paris Attacks
http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/13/parisburns-isis-takes-to-twitter-to-gloat-over-paris-attacks/


ISIS claims Paris attacks as REVENGE for Syria airstrikes and insulting Islam's prophet
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/619363/Islamic-State-ISIS-Twitter-Paris-attacks

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...ris-attacks-twitter-reports-article-1.2434707

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/w...paris-attacks-calling-them-miracles.html?_r=0

 

[hit&run]

Lets not complicate things here. Every possible effort should be made for the narrative not to be lost neither in translation nor in political correctness. Conspiracy theory by rule of thumb needs no rebuke, it should die its own death.

France stand alone against those who are attacking its cities. So is every country.

There are local factions who have been radicalized under their nose. The same phenomenon is prevalent everywhere in Europe. Less attacks in other European countries simply mean they are just being lucky.

France's military expeditions in Africa has given shot in the arm to those who are doing radicalization for the cause of Sharia and Umah or (simply put this way) just for their natural way of doing things, Breed, Hate, Bigotry, Encroach, Ghetto, Disobedience, and Violence.

Ideally France military missions in Syria and Libya should have been supported by all its citizens. But these fanatics must have been handed over the entitlement to abuse the nation in the name of free speech and democracy by liberal-tards. The same liberal douchebag like we see in India and on internet must have put their own government under pressure not to take action against them when it was not that late.

Syrian refugee crisis just made logistical constraints ( man power, weapons and resolve) easy for an impending terror attack that would have taken place in any case. Rest of the Europe should hold on tight before it spills further.

 

[Kshatriya87]

Why not research first rather than protect an entity like IS?

Some more links good enough for you ?

#PARISBURNS: ISIS Takes TO Twitter To Gloat Over Paris Attacks
http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/13/parisburns-isis-takes-to-twitter-to-gloat-over-paris-attacks/


ISIS claims Paris attacks as REVENGE for Syria airstrikes and insulting Islam's prophet
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/619363/Islamic-State-ISIS-Twitter-Paris-attacks

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/wor...ris-attacks-twitter-reports-article-1.2434707

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/15/w...paris-attacks-calling-them-miracles.html?_r=0

I'm not protecting them. Only a nutbag would. I'm considering the possibility of US hand to deliberately push France in this war to counter Russia.

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

 

[Sakal Gharelu Ustad]

By the end when US intervened, they were just supplying weapons to the allies. They knew very well that both sides are losing when it comes to military power and money. So just supplying weapons and getting Europe under their debt will help whilst keeping American military and economy safe.

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

Where is the strategy here? There were countries already at war by their choice. They come and ask a third party for weapons and pay in cash, who would not like this proposition??

It is funny that you attribute even things like blind luck to US strategy.

 

[Kshatriya87]

Where is the strategy here? There were countries already at war by their choice. They come and ask a third party for weapons and pay in cash, who would not like this proposition??

It is funny that you attribute even things like blind luck to US strategy.

It was blind luck then. They wanted to get involved whilst keeping there end safe. By supplying weapons, they grew economically and militarily. this led to their rise as a superpower.

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

 

[jackprince]

By the end when US intervened, they were just supplying weapons to the allies. They knew very well that both sides are losing when it comes to military power and money. So just supplying weapons and getting Europe under their debt will help whilst keeping American military and economy safe.

Sent from my HTC One_E8 dual sim using Tapatalk

http://googleweblight.com/?lite_url...600429&sig=APONPFktHhMnplevc9RrMQwBtxi-L8VlJw