Pakistani terrorists attacked Army Camp in J&K's Uri

Status
Not open for further replies.

tsunami

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2015
Messages
3,378
Likes
15,867
Country flag
And Still People are bashing modi as he has done nothing then what about khangress even after 26/11 they did nothing but still retained power
That's the point. People choose govt. for development not for war. People here say Modi will loose in 2019 if he didn't attack now. Congress did nothing after 2009 and even 6 month later it not only survived the election but came back with even more seats.

Many keyboard worriers here are just frustrated. They will admit at various level Modi did many things against Pakistan, and pakistan is feeling the heat. But you know they are just frustrated, so let them enjoy and abuse Modi. If they want something concrete happening on ground in long term Modi is the only option right now.
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,039
Country flag
China controls Aksai Chin and what have we done about it? Did we blow them up with nuclear weapons? Has the trade stopped?
When chinese took aksai chin, did we have capable missiles? And why do you want to nuke them? No need. Just conventional warheads are enough.
 

Sakal Gharelu Ustad

Detests Jholawalas
Ambassador
Joined
Apr 28, 2012
Messages
7,114
Likes
7,762
That's the point. People choose govt. for development not for war. People here say Modi will loose in 2019 if he didn't attack now. Congress did nothing after 2009 and even 6 month later it not only survived the election but came back with even more seats.

Many keyboard worriers here are just frustrated. They will admit at various level Modi did many things against Pakistan, and pakistan is feeling the heat. But you know they are just frustrated, so let them enjoy and abuse Modi. If they want something concrete happening on ground in long term Modi is the only option right now.
Unfortunately you are right.,...................
 

Screambowl

Ghanta Senior Member?
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,950
Likes
7,908
Country flag
still even after having lower population and help form foreign nations there gdp per capita is low then that of Bharats and ther already havin debt issues while India is the next superpower how would you expect them to be better than us the 1971 war was not about Kasmir bro
Yes because of Kashmir .....................................................
 

Abhinav Dharma

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
174
Likes
78
That's the point. People choose govt. for development not for war. People here say Modi will loose in 2019 if he didn't attack now. Congress did nothing after 2009 and even 6 month later it not only survived the election but came back with even more seats.

Many keyboard worriers here are just frustrated. They will admit at various level Modi did many things against Pakistan, and pakistan is feeling the heat. But you know they are just frustrated, so let them enjoy and abuse Modi. If they want something concrete happening on ground in long term Modi is the only option right now.
yeah and thats why free sindhudesh slogans are coming up in retalliation they did uri and uri is not even big like 26/11 and modi responded not like gunga manmohan people like @Bornubus @Screambowl are not understanding
 

Abhinav Dharma

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
174
Likes
78
Yes because of Kashmir .....................................................
What the heck pakistan had terrorist problem in its own backyard fata region was captured by taliban the same taliban who pakis trained to fight aganist the Soviets but you know KARMA RETALLIATES :hail::hail::hail: and it was not about KASHMIR:biggrin2:
 

Screambowl

Ghanta Senior Member?
Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
7,950
Likes
7,908
Country flag
What the heck pakistan had terrorist problem in its own backyard fata region was captured by taliban the same taliban who pakis trained to fight aganist the Soviets but you know KARMA RETALLIATES :hail::hail::hail: and it was not about KASHMIR:biggrin2:
Pakistan harboured terrorist to use it in Kashmir and do operation Gibralter 2.0
 

Abhinav Dharma

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
174
Likes
78
Pakistan harboured terrorist to use it in Kashmir and do operation Gibralter 2.0
even pakis admitted it that they created it for soviet union not for KASHMIR:biggrin2:
Source:http://www.understandingwar.org/pakistan-and-afghanistan
After Pakistan’s creation in 1947, Afghanistan objected to its admission to the United Nations. The Afghan government of the time decided not to recognize Pakistan as the legitimate inheritor of the territorial agreements reached with the British India. There were several ambiguous and often changing demands from Kabul centered around the aspirations—as Kabul saw it—of the Pashtun and Baluch ethnicities inside Pakistan. For intermittent periods between 1947 and 1973, Kabul extended support to Baluch and Pashtun nationalists inside Pakistan and even called for the creation of a new state called “Pashtunistan.” In 1973, Pakistan, grappling with territorial insecurities, resorted to extending support to Islamists dissidents that opposed Afghanistan’s Republican government of Sardar Daud. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto’s government created the “Afghan Cell” within Pakistan’s foreign office and assigned it a policy that included strengthening ties with and empowering Islamists in exile in Pakistan, and improving Pakistan’s influence over governments in Kabul.

Sardar Daud made friendly gestures to Pakistan in the late 1970s, but his overtures were cut short by a Communist coup in 1978. The new regime in Kabul returned to the support—at least rhetorical—for Pashtun and Baluch nationalists in Pakistan. The 1979 Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was seen by Pakistan as a grave threat to its national security. It also presented Pakistan with a major avenue to build on its 1973 policy of empowering dissident Islamists against the governments in Kabul. Furthermore, Pakistan had been a partner of the United States in the Cold War since the 1950s, and this cooperation had provoked numerous Soviet threats over the years. The new leader of Pakistan, General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq, who seized power in a 1977 military coup, was a fervent anti-communist and Islamist. General Zia approached the United States for help with organizing a religious resistance against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

The US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) also began funding the Afghan resistance in 1979. Accepted doctrine was that America would not overtly reveal its hand in a proxy war with the Soviets, and therefore the CIA worked through its ally Pakistan. Zia insisted that Islamabad would decide who in Afghanistan received American aid, and the arbiters of this policy ultimately became Pakistan’s spy agency, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), and the Pakistani Islamist party Jamaat-e-Islami, which supported Zia’s dictatorship. As the war progressed and as US and the Saudi Arabia led Arab funding for the mujahideen skyrocketed, the Pakistani government and the ISI gained enormous influence in Afghan affairs.

The Afghan resistance coalescing in Pakistan was a combination of nationalist and religious parties. At the outset, they were divided into over a hundred groups. In 1980, the ISI reorganized them into bigger units and it officially recognized seven of these Peshawar-based parties. Anyone wishing to receive aid from Pakistan, the US, the Arabs, and others, had to join one of these groups. The largest of these factions were the ethnic Tajik-dominated Jamiat-e Islami, led by Burhanuddin Rabbani and Ahmad Shah Massoud, and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s Hezb-e Islami. Hezb-e Islami was favored by ISI and had close ties to Zia’s backers in Jamaat-e-Islami. It was also one the most radical of the groups. Gulbuddin’s Hizb ultimately received the bulk of the foreign aid (mostly American and Saudi) during the Afghan resistance. Pakistan provided the mujahideen with weapons, supplies, training, and bases from which to operate; and Pakistani units, disguised as mujahideen, also participated directly in the fighting.
After the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan in 1989, international interest in Afghanistan and the mujahideen began to wane. Zia died in a plane crash in 1988, and was succeeded by Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, the daughter of the man he had overthrown and hanged a decade earlier. However, even though Hezb-e Islami was closely affiliated with Bhutto’s political enemy, Jamaat-e-Islami, the ISI continued to support Hekmatyar’s faction and the other mujahedeen parties against the communist regime of Dr. Najibullah in Kabul. After Kabul fell in 1992, attempts were made to bring Hekmatyar into a unity government with Rabbani and Massoud, but the Hezb-e Islami commander continued to attack his rivals. Afghanistan spiraled into a brutal civil conflict between competing mujahideen warlords, none of whom were capable of unifying or stabilizing the entire country. Kabul remained in Massoud’s control.

Benazir Bhutto briefly lost the office of Prime Minister in 1990, but returned to power three years later. Hekmatyar’s failure to advance against Jamiat and other forces around Kabul led to the decline of Islamabad’s support for his group. Bhutto’s interior minister, General Nasirullah Babur discovered and empowered a group of former Mujahideen from the Kandahar area as Pakistan’s new strategic card in the Afghan conflict. Working through Jamaat-e-Islami’s rival Pakistani Islamist party Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam, Islamabad began supporting the students the party trained in its madrassas in the Afghan refugee camps, who came to be known as the Taliban. Bhutto was determined to deal a blow to Jamaat-e-Islami, which she believed had aided and abetted her father’s executioner and was partly responsible for her losing power. She also wanted to weaken the ISI. But in 1996, as Bhutto’s second government was dissolved by Pakistan’s president, and as the Taliban grew into a formidable force, the ISI regained control of Pakistan’s Afghan policy.

During the 1990s, at the center of Pakistan’s Afghan policy was the military’s pursuit of “strategic depth” in Afghanistan that could be useful in the event of any military conflict with India. Bhutto’s second government also sought a stability that will allow it access to the newly independent Central Asian republics. Pakistan was also seeking a government in Kabul that did not indulge ethno-nationalists issues inside Pakistan, and question the Duran Line as the boundary between the two countries. The Taliban, with Pakistani and Saudi backing, proved very capable, conquering Kandahar in 1994, Kabul in 1996, and most of the rest of the country by 1998. Pakistan, along with Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, extended diplomatic recognition to the Taliban regime—the only countries to do so. Rabbani, Massoud, and other factional leaders retreated to corners in the north of the country and later formed the United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan (also known as the Northern Alliance). Hekmatyar sought refuge in Iran in 1997.

In the late 1990s, Pakistan continued to support the Taliban regime in its war against the Northern Alliance, while Rus
 
Last edited:

raheel besharam

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2016
Messages
851
Likes
2,004
This is the difference :lol: we talk about war on Poverty while Pakis lol
Even the defense minister of pakistan recently stated that "hum india ki nasley mita denge agar hum par attack hua"

But i hope modi and his team are doing something about pakistan behind the scenes.
 

gokussj9

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
1,096
Likes
1,387
Country flag
Any kind of step will have a certain cost and unless we are willing to pay that, the drama will continue. The problem with us is that the baniya mentality/psyche of somehow extracting one extra paisa from any transaction doesn't leave us hence, no feeling of any shame/pride/dignity. Moreover, we are simply towing Unkil's line with all these steps especially ratifying the climate deal. But unfortunately, even becoming a obeying poodle is unable to save us from humiliation. :rotfl:
 

Abhinav Dharma

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2016
Messages
174
Likes
78
Khujli was against the name change.. he cannot change the name he is just a khujli in arse.
True but modi is better then all of ther contender better then khujliwal,khangress,mulla-yam who would bring reservation in private sector too if elected.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top