According to SA - it is a wonderful agreement and i love quoting it:
In order to achieve this objective, the Government of India and the Government of Pakistan have agreed as follows:
(i) That the principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations shall govern the relations between the two countries.
(ii) That the two countries are resolved to settle their differences by peaceful means through bilateral negotiations or by any other peaceful means mutually agreed upon between them. Pending the final settlement of any of the problems between the two countries, neither side shall unilaterally alter the situation and both shall prevent the organization, assistance or encouragement of any acts detrimental to the maintenance of peace and harmonious relations.
(iii) That the prerequisite for reconciliation, good neighborliness and durable peace between them is a commitment by both the countries to peaceful coexistence respect for each others territorial integrity and sovereignty and noninterference in each others internal affairs, on the basis of equality and mutual benefit. That the basic issues and causes of conflict which have bedeviled the relations between the two countries for the last 25 years shall be resolved by peaceful means.
(v) That they shall always respect each others national unity, territorial integrity, political independence and sovereign equality.
(vi) That in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, they will refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of each other.
Simla Agreement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What happens if Pakistan breaches the agreement. This is a principle and most important agreement between the two countries that has shaped and determined their relationship and (some can say partial) breaching of it demands a immense recompense. The above are prerequisite(s). The intent of the agreement was to show to Pakistan that India does not have ill-intent towards it and wants to see it subsist - and that is clearly slept out for even the dumbest and most foolish.
It seems that a period of a little peace and little enhancement (not improvement) has started to make the Paki leaders think everything is normal and they are normal and everyone ought to treat them normally. This small period that Pakistan is feeling is owing to India no doubt and other partners in the international community including the USA. Now Pakistan wants to forget the past and say that has got nothing to do with the present. How ironic when they bring up the past and Kashmir.
Also importantly who says India has said anything about negotiating anything to do with India Administrated Kashmir. India is well equipped and has the maturity to talk to the people of India Administrated Kashmir and has provided them more self-determination and benefits somesay compared to whole of Pakistan (one continuous democratic elections means nothing). One can say the only issue of negotiation and discussion is on the Pakistan Occupied Kashmir portion. Keeping the LOC like it is works in India favor because the Pakis are confused in their Kashmir policy. What are they doing in Kashmir anyway. Is it part of Pakistan, Is it independent, What about self-determination. Make them to spell out their official position. Its ever-changing. If they refer to UN resolutions ask them what are they doing in Kashmir - where does it say that and how did they get there. If they say that it is about self-determination of the people of Kashmir. Ask them to take the steps that India has done into the area of POK and wait for its implementation and Pakistan is the last country in the universe that needs to teach anyone about self-determination. Keeping the LOC in my opinion works in India favor because it keeps alive the dimension of integrating and reestablishing Jammu and Kashmir part of Republic of India and a important implication and significance that India never gave up on Kashmir and people of Kashmir and wants Jammu and Kashmir to be one and has risked its lives and fought for such (unlike Pakistan that gave away parts of Kashmir to PRC - double standards - whats the intention and what people of Kashmir think about that).
Even before that there is too many problem and issues and anomalies that Pakistan needs to fix before it even start to think about the above.
This includes:
- Will there be a democratic election after the current administration finishes its term.
- The explicit Afghanistan and the terrorist policy of Pakistan.
- The Arab policy of Pakistan and their involvement in Shia and Sunni dimensions.
- There is and was nuclear proliferation with the Paki fingerprints. North Korea, Iran, Libya, and more.
- There is western PRC dynamics.
- There is Islamic extremism globally with Paki fingerprints.
- There is economy and chance of default.
- There are non-state actors and areas where there is no proper control.
- The assumption that Raw, Mossad, CIA are creating chaos.
- The Shia composition of Pakistan Occupied Kashmir and do they want to be part of Pakistan.
- The treatment of minorities in Pakistan (including Shias).
- The tension between Military and Political forces.
- Musharraf.
- Failure to grasp international law, sovereignty and principles of
national unity, territorial integrity, political independence and sovereign equality of its own area(s).
- Drone attacks.
- The Mass Graves in Baluchistan
- and more.
I wonder if before making the statement on Kashmir to the Americans (and anyone else) did the Paki PM think what the international community is more concerned about in Pakistan (pick a top three of the above). It is a non-starter and Pakistan has lost its comprehension and intention long time ago on anything to do with Kashmir and needs to worry about many other things. This actually started when they signed the Shimla Agreement and has evolved more and more to the present day.