OBOR News & Developments

Hiranyaksha

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
2,098
Likes
4,515
Country flag
http://idrw.org/images-show-china-m...nnel-to-divert-brahmaputra-water-into-desert/

Images show China may be using a secret tunnel to divert Brahmaputra water into desert

Published December 13, 2017 | By admin SOURCE: THE PRINT



In what is perhaps the first evidence of a possible diversion project by China, latest satellite imagery shows a massive new dam on the Brahmaputra river — Yarlong Tsangpo in Tibetan — with an underground tunnel that seems to engulf the entire water flow for almost one kilometre.

The Brahmaputra is sacred to Indians and Tibetans alike and has its origins in the Angsi Glacier in Purang county of Tibet. It has been in the news for water reportedly turning black on the Indian side and in connection with Chinese plans to divert it to the arid lands of the Taklamakan desert.

Although the Indian government has said that there is no evidence of any water diversion project, satellite imagery from 26 November 2017, courtesy US commercial vendor of space imagery DigitalGlobe, indicates a new project in an advanced stage. This report – based on latest satellite images — examines only the actual ground position. Measurements are made on very low resolution images and may not be exact.


NEW PROJECT

The available images show a new 200 m wide dam that seems to have completely blocked the water of the Brahmaputra. The entire river seems to be forced into two inlets of almost 50 m width each towards the west of the river. The water flow comes out after around 900 m downstream in two outlets very similar to the size and shape of the inlets.

The project – currently under construction – is located 60 km east of Shannan township as the crow flies. The location is also almost 40 km east of Sangri county.
Source: Vinayak Bhat

What has raised questions about this project is that another project – Tsangmo or Zangmu Dam — has recently been constructed just 13 km downstream. This run of the river dam was made operational in end-2015 and has a capacity of 510 MW power production. Beijing did not pay any attention to India’s objections to the Tsangmo dam.

POSSIBLE DIVERSION PLAN

The construction of another dam 13 km upstream of Tsangmo which diverts the entire water inside the mountain suggests that its purpose may not just be hydropower generation. The purpose of this project is possibly for diverting a portion of the Brahmaputra to the parched areas of Taklamakan desert.

The geography of the area, when studied deeply with the elevation profile, clearly indicates that China may actually be planning to divert the waters of the Brahmaputra approximately 1,100 km northwest of the project site.

The path indicated on the image below shows the possible route of the underground tunnel which does not touch any water body on its way.

The height difference at the project site and the point of Taklamakan desert suggest that a clear downslope will be available for the water to flow naturally without any additional constructions for large storage wells in between.



Source: Vinayak Bhat


India being downstream of the Brahmaputra has full rights over its waters and any diversion of water from this river could likely hurt Indian agriculture. During any emergency, a sudden release of water from this project can also cause havoc on the Indian side.

BLACK WATERS

Satellite imagery shows that polymer resin adhesives are being sprayed by China all around this project area as a dust suppressant system. The resin adhesives are commonly used for large construction projects but are never used for projects near water, according to some water projects construction engineers, since these polymer resin adhesives are said to be harmful to humans and animals. The resin sprays have been observed over the last two months.

The rough estimate of time for water flow to reach India from this project location is 15 to 20 days. The colour of the Brahmaputra water in Assam acquiring a darker shade, according to reports in the media, could possibly be due to the use of these resin adhesives at this project site. CONSTRUCTION IN FULL SWING Satellite images clearly show stone crushers and cement plants at the site. The products of this facility are obviously used inside these tunnels for construction purposes.

The material being quarried from inside these tunnels is being piled along the river up to the road level. Most of the stones have been crushed to different sizes and some of it may be pushed into the river along with the water flow.

A large number of tippers and other vehicles are seen carrying material to and from this area. An administrative area is also seen east of the project with a large number of red-roofed houses and barracks, possibly living quarters for staff and may also contain administrative buildings.

idrw.org .Read more at India No 1 Defence News Website http://idrw.org/images-show-china-m...nnel-to-divert-brahmaputra-water-into-desert/ .
 

Hiranyaksha

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2017
Messages
2,098
Likes
4,515
Country flag
I knew that Indian government/administration is hiding something . Fuckers have no balls to confront China.
___________________________________________________________________________________
 

Willy2

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
847
Likes
1,559
The height difference at the project site and the point of Taklamakan desert suggest that a clear downslope will be available for the water to flow naturally without any additional constructions for large storage wells in between.

Don't understand this point , if China want to develop tunnel then it can also create critical gradient within it to divert water through it ,unless I misinterpret the point and chinese diverting water in a canal type exposed system .

It's very much possible that govt hide it due to political purpose ,Chinese in anyway not going to hear our "strong protest" ...so instead of whining on it ,govt possible start working in backup , tsangpo carry 10-20% of Total Brahmaputra's water so water scarcity might not be most worrying point , deliberate poisoning of water is what we need to counter .

I am very curious why Countries in downstream of most of the Tibet born River like most of the ASEAN+Bangladesh+India never form a strong group to counter china ? we face similar situation of chinese water bullying , it's time for water for trade type blackmail...

Also joint bashing of Chian also decrease the Chinese influence in a large chunk of Asia , hopefully we can pull countries liek Thailand-Combodia-laos from chinese influence and work in it .
 

Kshatriya87

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
10,136
Likes
16,039
Country flag
Pakistan denies claims of China halting CPEC project funding

Islamabad: During a weekly meeting, Pakistan’s Foreign Office Spokesperson Dr Muhammad Faisal denied reports that Beijing had halted payments for China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) projects worth USD 50 billion.

Earlier, National Assembly Secretariat Ahsan Iqbal had informed CPEC parliamentary committee that work on these projects would only restart after Beijing issues 'new guidelines.'




Muhammad Faisal denied the claims saying that payments were executed in a specific manner.

Al-Haj Gul Khan Afridi, had told Dawn newspaper that funding had not been stonewalled but that China had raised 'technical objections' to three National Highways Authority (NHA) road projects.

Read: China stops CPEC project funding over graft charges, Pak 'stunned': report

Afridi’s claims had been rubbished by a senior NHA official who said, “It is not true that China raised objections to the projects because these had already been approved at the 6th Joint Cooperation Committee (JCC) meeting held last year”

The three were related to the road network and were allegedly halted following reports of corruption. The decision can reportedly impact road projects worth Rs 1 trillion.

Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) leader Asad Umar had said, the members were informed that Beijing was reassessing the projects under its "financial review".

CPEC is the crown jewel of China's ‘One Belt One Road’ endeavour, which has routinely impeded by frequent terrorist activities. India has opposed the project as it passes through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

The prestigious project was launched during President Xi Jinping’s Pakistan visit in 2015.

Originally, part of Pakistan’s domestic development programmes, CPEC now envisions investment in several projects across the country that are worth around USD 50 billion.

 

Yggdrasil

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2016
Messages
682
Likes
3,749
Country flag
I strongly urge everyone to watch this entire conference in spite of the poor audio:


Many insider perspectives not available in the media, along with experiences of what's happening in Xinjiang, what's happening in PoK, what's happening in Balochistan etc.

Also a lot of low-IQ Porkistani nationalists in the audience with a poor grasp of English trying to be self-righteous as usual.

An explosive panel!
 

Willy2

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
847
Likes
1,559
I strongly urge everyone to watch this entire conference in spite of the poor audio:


Many insider perspectives not available in the media, along with experiences of what's happening in Xinjiang, what's happening in PoK, what's happening in Balochistan etc.

Also a lot of low-IQ Porkistani nationalists in the audience with a poor grasp of English trying to be self-righteous as usual.

An explosive panel!
They are probably in Canada , he also appear in many kashmir centric show hosted in rawalTV of Canada...he hate napakis ,don't know but probably far more than India .
 

AMCA

Senior Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,562
Likes
17,850
Country flag
China Faces Pushback in the UN on Belt-Road Initiative, Retreats Quietly
BY SEEMA SIROHI ON 17/12/2017LEAVE A COMMENT
SHARE THIS:


Diplomatic sources say China didn’t want to answer questions on transparency and environmental standards.
China’s Ambassador to the United Nations Liu Jieyi speaks at a news conference at UN headquarters in New York City. Credit: Reuters/Carlo Allegri

" data-medium-file="https://i1.wp.com/thewire.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/China-UN_Reuters.jpeg?fit=300,200&ssl=1" data-large-file="https://i1.wp.com/thewire.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/China-UN_Reuters.jpeg?fit=800,533&ssl=1" class="size-full wp-image-205845" src="https://i1.wp.com/thewire.in/wp-con...a-UN_Reuters.jpeg?zoom=2&resize=310,207&ssl=1" alt="China's Ambassador to the United Nations Liu Jieyi speaks at a news conference at UN headquarters in New York City. Credit: Reuters/Carlo Allegri" width="310" height="207" srcset="https://i1.wp.com/thewire.in/wp-con...a-UN_Reuters.jpeg?zoom=2&resize=310,207&ssl=1" src-orig="https://i1.wp.com/thewire.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/China-UN_Reuters.jpeg?resize=800,533&ssl=1" scale="2" style="-x-ignore: 1">
China’s Ambassador to the United Nations Liu Jieyi speaks at a news conference at UN headquarters in New York City. Credit: Reuters/Carlo Allegri/Files

Washington: China’s efforts to project its ‘One Belt One Road’ as the panacea for the world faced a serious setback this week at the United Nations, when a coalition led by India and the US pushed back and forced Beijing to retreat.

The laudatory language about OBOR inserted last year by hyperactive Chinese diplomats was dropped as more and more countries asked for details on China’s financing mechanisms and environmental standards in pushing the gargantuan scheme.

The hard work of coalition building over the last two months was done by a team of young Indian diplomats from India’s permanent mission. Japan and several members of the EU joined in to raise questions and counter China’s narrative.

The results were there for all to see when on December 11, the UN General Assembly adopted the two resolutions minus the language used in 2016 that had essentially equated world peace with promoting OBOR.

What it proved – in however small a measure – is that China is not invincible, especially if others can present a united front. “It is possible to fight the dragon,” a UN observer commented. “Success comes to those who dare.”

India took the lead in questioning the language, the US joined in, and the others slowly followed, including many EU members. Some in the EU are more aware or are less beholden to the Chinese than some others, making the internal debates rancorous and time-consuming. But the clear US position is important in influencing the more recent EU members who are more prone to falling under Chinese influence.

Beijing chose not to go to battle to force the issue at the UN, diplomatic sources said. It didn’t want to answer the many questions on transparency and environmental standards, or have to explain the intricacies of OBOR’s dicey finance mechanisms to well-informed UN representatives who keep up with the news.

The Chinese would have been quizzed about the 99-year lease with Sri Lanka on the Hambantota port, a development that opened many eyes around the world because it is seen as a threat to the island nation’s sovereignty. India and the US were more than ready for a full-fledged debate on the merits and demerits of OBOR.

China clearly wasn’t. It chose to quietly back away from a fight and let the pro-OBOR language be deleted from the two resolutions. “They got scared and ran. We know how to play the system too,” a coalition member said.
 

amoy

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
5,982
Likes
1,849
China, Pakistan, Afghanistan agree to discuss extending economic corridor




Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi (C), Afghan Foreign Minister Salahuddin Rabbani (L) and Pakistani Foreign Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif, meet the press after the 1st China-Afghanistan-Pakistan Foreign Ministers' Dialogue, in Beijing, capital of China, Dec. 26, 2017. (Xinhua/Yan Yan)

BEIJING, Dec. 26 (Xinhua) -- Foreign ministers from China, Pakistan and Afghanistan on Tuesday agreed to discuss ways to extend the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) to Afghanistan.

"In the long run, through Afghanistan, we will gradually connect the CPEC with the China-Central and Western Asia Economic Corridor," Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told reporters after China-Afghanistan-Pakistan foreign ministers' meeting in Beijing.

As important neighbor of China and Pakistan, Afghanistan has an urgent desire to develop its economy and improve people's livelihood, and it is willing to integrate itself into the process of regional interconnection, said Wang.

"With regard to specific cooperation projects and ways of cooperation, we will determine through tripartite consultations on an equal footing," he said.

Improving livelihoods in border areas may be an entry point for the extension, said Wang, noting that the three parties agreed to promote wider connectivity under the framework of the Belt and Road Initiative.

The CPEC is a network of highways, railways, pipelines and optical cables, and a flagship project under the Belt and Road Initiative, currently under construction throughout Pakistan.

The 3,000-km-long corridor starts from China's Kashgar and ends at Pakistan's Gwadar, connecting the Silk Road Economic Belt in the north and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road in the south.

Wang said the CPEC has not targeted at any third party, but hopes to bring benefits to the entire region and become an important driving force for regional integration.

"The CPEC is an economic cooperation project and should not be politicized," he said, noting that it has no relationship with existing disputes in the region, including territorial disputes, nor should it be related.

As the first meeting of its kind since the three countries agreed to establish a trilateral dialogue mechanism in June, the foreign ministers' meeting aims for dialogue between Afghanistan and Pakistan and to reinforce trilateral cooperation in politics, economy and security.
 

Butter Chicken

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2016
Messages
9,736
Likes
69,860
Country flag
Transboundary dispute with India, root cause of China not financing Diamer-Bhasha Dam

ISLAMABAD: Due to lingering transboundary dispute with India, China has refused to provide financing for Diamer-Bhasha Dam, following in the footsteps of Asian Development Bank (ADB) and World Bank (WB).

Secretary Water Resources Shamail Ahmed Khawaja gave this news during a meeting of Cabinet Committee on CPEC, chaired by Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi, reported Business Recorder.

Mr. Khawaja provided status updates regarding suggestions to include Diamer-Bhasha Dam into China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). He shared the Chinese had carried out a detailed feasibility study of DBD project and raised various concerns.

The concerns raised by the Chinese were linked to logistics, seismic hazard, social and environmental impact, geopolitical aspect and technical aspects of construction and equipment.

He further informed the committee regarding the transboundary issue raised by the Chinese and the Indian refusal to provide no-objection certificate to ADB and WB for financing this project. Khawaja said this seriously damaged the prospects of DBD’s inclusion into CPEC and concluded in Chinese assistance in not being materialized.

Secretary Power Division stated dam should be setup through indigenous resources via combination of commercial financing, PSDP grant and Wapda equity. He added power generation may be initiated 2-3 years after work on DBD starts.

Furthermore, over 85 percent of the land had already been purchased at a cost of Rs86 billion for DBD project and relocation/resettlement was underway, said Secretary power division.

In November, it was reported China’s demand of ownership rights and other strict conditions for Diamer-Bhasha dam had forced Pakistan to exclude this project from China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

This was stated by Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) Chairman Muzammil Hussain, who said Chinese conditions for financing Diamer-Bhasha dam weren’t workable and stood against the country’s interests.

He shared that Chinese conditions included taking ownership of project, operation and maintenance cost and securitization of Diamer-Bhasha project by promising another operational dam.

Considering these conditions as unacceptable, Prime Minister Shahid Khaqan Abbasi had moved a summary saying that Pakistan would finance Diamer-Bhasha dam from its own resources.
 

john70

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
708
Likes
1,019
Country flag
http://www.dw.com/en/skepticism-in-gilgit-baltistan-over-china-pakistan-economic-corridor/a-42010956


Skepticism in Gilgit-Baltistan over China-Pakistan Economic Corridor
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor initiative created euphoria in Pakistan, but in Gilgit-Baltistan, a disputed northern region, the locals are concerned about land grabbing and demographic shift. Sattar Khan reports.




Gilgit-Baltistan is Pakistan's northernmost administrative territory that borders the Pakistan-administered Kashmir to the south, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province to the west, Afghanistan to the north, China's Xinjiang region to the east and northeast, and the India-administered Kashmir to the southeast. In 2009, former Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari granted limited autonomy to the region.

Gilgit-Baltistan is a disputed territory and a gateway to the massive, multibillion-dollar worth China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which is part of Beijing's international Belt and Road initiative (BRI). CPEC projects in the area have raised concerns among the locals.

The Pakistani government asserts that CPEC is an economic game-changer and will bring prosperity to all parts of the country, including Gilgit-Baltistan. But the people of this area, most of whom are Shiite unlike the majority of Pakistanis who are Sunni Muslims, take such claims with a pinch of salt. They fear that these projects would not only trigger an ecological disaster, a demographic shift and land grabbing, but also threaten their unique culture.

"The Chinese are known for implementing development projects without caring much about environmental issues," Farman Ali, a political activist from Upper Hunza in Gilgit-Baltistan, told DW.

"Over 70,000 trucks will pass through this region daily, emitting a large amount of carbon. The government will also lay railway tracks in this mountainous area by building a number of tunnels. This will likely cause landslides and disturb the region's ecological balance," Ali said.

Read more: Gwadar – Pakistan's impoverished colony or an economic hub?


Employment issues

Islamabad claims the project would create employment opportunities for some 1.8 million people in Gilgit-Baltistan. The locals, however, are not ready to buy this claim. Despite having one of the highest literacy rates in Pakistan, the Gilgit-Baltistan youths are desperately looking for jobs.

Amir Hussain, a political analyst from the Lower Hunza part of the region, spurns the federal government's employment assurance. "The Chinese bring their own manpower wherever they go. For CPEC, they are likely to bring seven million Chinese workers to Pakistan. Around 400,000 of them will be working in Gilgit-Baltistan. How will the locals get jobs?" Hussain questioned.

"Forget about the jobs; the locals are actually losing their livelihood because of this project. Small manufacturers and shop owners are suffering as a result of the Chinese goods flooding the market. The government has also cancelled the licenses for local miners. Mining in the areas is being handed over to the Chinese," Hussain told DW.

Read more: Why are Pakistanis keen to learn Chinese language?

Land grabbing?

Land is a precious commodity in this mountainous terrain. And the local population fears the CPEC-related projects would swallow their lands.

Hussain says the government has allocated around 500 acres of land for a special economic zone in the Maqpoon Das area. "These lands have been taken over in the name of CPEC projects. In addition, the army is planning to build checkpoints to provide security to CPEC projects. Fort that reason, they are planning to relocate people from Hunza and Nagar districts, which are located close to the Chinese border," Hussain claimed.

"CPEC has become a holy cow in Pakistan. The locals are not allowed to protest against CPEC projects. Those who do so are booked under anti-terrorism laws and dubbed anti-state elements," the analyst added.

But government officials dismiss these allegations and insist there is a consensus in Gilgit-Baltistan over CPEC.

Faizullah Faraq, spokesman for the Gilgit-Baltistan local government, says all stakeholders have welcomed the massive development in the area.

"CPEC will connect Gilgit-Baltistan to other parts of the country. The area will have a special economic zone, a railway track, fruit processing plants and livestock schemes. The locals are very happy about all this," Faraq told DW.

"The government has formed a land reform commission. Lands have only been identified for various CPEC projects but they have not been taken over yet. The commission will decide whether these lands should be taken over or not, and only after compensating the landowners."

The influx of Chinese workers is just one concern for the Gilgit-Baltistan residents. They also fear that laborers from other parts of Pakistan, particularly from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Punjab provinces, would take away their jobs as a result of CPEC.

Read more:

China's economic corridor creating new conflicts in Pakistan

Economic corridor - CPEC could turn Pakistan into China's 'client state'


Chinese President Xi Jinping inaugurated the economic corridor project in Pakistan in 2015

Simmering sectarian conflict

Gilgit-Baltistan witnessed massive sectarian riots in the 1980s under General Zia-ul-Haq's regime. It is alleged that Haq, a Sunni military dictator, encouraged a large number of Sunni Muslims from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (then North Western Frontier Province) to move into this Shiite-dominated region in an attempt to alter the area's demography. Some political and security analysts claim that the Pakistani security establishment needed the region as a route for jihadists to support a separatist insurgency in the India-administered Kashmir.

CPEC could once again cause migration from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa into Gilgit-Baltistan.

"Most of the hotels, shops, markets and businesses are already owned by non-locals from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa or Punjab. Now CPEC projects will attract more migrants. This will ultimately turn the locals into a minority," Sher Babu, a political worker in Gilgit-Baltistan, told DW.

Some Gilgit-Baltistan residents believe that Sunni militant groups have already gained a foothold in the area.

"These jihadists are gaining strength and Gilgit-Baltistan could once again become a center of sectarian conflict," a Skardu resident told DW on condition of anonymity.
 

Mikesingh

Professional
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
7,353
Likes
30,450
Country flag
Whoa! Indian company given contract for detailed geo-mapping (and industrial mapping) of the CPEC!!!!

This means we will have the complete and minutest details regarding the VAs / VPs along the CPEC! And that's going to be a security nightmare for the Pakis! They're getting screwed not only by the Chinese but now by India too!

Check this out.......(Upto 5:45)


 
Last edited:

Sameer Chaudhary

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2017
Messages
315
Likes
715
Whoa! Indian company given contract for detailed geo-mapping (and industrial mapping) of the CPEC!!!!

This means we will have the complete and minutest details regarding the VAs / VPs along the CPEC! And that's going to be a security nightmare for the Pakis! They're getting screwed not only by the Chinese but now by India too!

Check this out.......(Upto 5:45)


they always keep weeping, majloom quam, s**lo ki shakal hi roney ki hain.
 

Dovah

Untermensch
Senior Member
Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
5,614
Likes
6,793
Country flag
Whoa! Indian company given contract for detailed geo-mapping (and industrial mapping) of the CPEC!!!!

This means we will have the complete and minutest details regarding the VAs / VPs along the CPEC! And that's going to be a security nightmare for the Pakis! They're getting screwed not only by the Chinese but now by India too!

Check this out.......


The thing is, it is not even an Indian company. It is the McKinsey group. They are paranoid because a lot of people of Indian heritage work in mid, upper-middle positions there. These people are deluded.

Going by Pakistani media these days, 2 decades of brainwashing, inbreeding and lack of education has finally taken its toll.
 

vinuzap

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 15, 2016
Messages
509
Likes
693
It means u.s has access to what is happening and recently there was a news on both u.s and india media on chinese particular interest in one small time of gwadar(navy), even if constructed who knows at any given day some terrorist or freedom fighter blast it
 

aghamarshana

Mitron......naacho
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2017
Messages
2,031
Likes
10,867
Country flag
It means u.s has access to what is happening and recently there was a news on both u.s and india media on chinese particular interest in one small time of gwadar(navy), even if constructed who knows at any given day some terrorist or freedom fighter blast it
Well,then we can bomb it anytime and claim the perpetrators are Baloch Freedom Fighters...
 

nimo_cn

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
4,032
Likes
883
Country flag
things only fail when we stop trying. OBOR is a long term plan, it takes time to achieve a recognizable success.
 

indus

Living in Post Truth
Senior Member
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
5,086
Likes
22,072
Country flag
More steps in direction of making Pakistan another Autonomous Region of PRC.

China issues sweeping guidelines to push yuan for Belt and Road business
The Newspaper's Staff ReporterJanuary 12, 2018

A woman rides past the People’s Bank of China headquarters in Beijing. The Chinese are urging Pakistan to expand the role of the yuan in the economy from trade and investment payments to reserve currency, and even asking for it to be made a legal tender in Gwadar, a demand that has not yet been accepted.—Reuters


KARACHI: The People’s Bank of China (PBC) has announced a raft of new measures to push a greater cross-border role for the yuan that aim to “contribute to opening up on all fronts”.

The measures go far beyond yuan settlement of cross-border trade. In a notice posted on its website, the PBC lists five seperate measures to be pursued. The list is reproduced below.

First, all cross-border business allowed by the law to be settled with foreign exchange can also be settled with RMB by enterprises. Following the principle of serving the real economy and facilitating trade and investment, banks are encouraged to develop new financial products based on current cross-border RMB business policies, in order to improve their capacity in providing financial services, and meet market players’ real and legitimate demands for cross-border RMB business.

Employee compensation, remittance of profits, dividends and ‘other returns’ to investment can be in yuan for BRI investments

Second, to serve the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and meet the demands for cross-border RMB settlement in employee compensation, social welfare, and allowance for family remittance in individual accounts, banks can provide individuals with cross-border payment services under other current account items. This will make it easier for domestic individuals to remit their legitimate income from overseas, and vice versa.

Third, to promote green development, the Notice proposes specific rules for cross-border RMB settlement on carbon emission trading by overseas investors.

Fourth, direct RMB investments by overseas investors are made much easier. The Notice further optimises relevant procedures, eliminates limitations on relevant account opening and payments, and clearly permits banks to provide relevant services to meet enterprises’ actual demands following the three basic principles of doing business. The Notice requires banks to ensure the free remittance of RMB profits, dividends, and other investment returns of overseas investors.

Fifth, the RMB funds raised by domestic enterprises through issuing bonds or shares overseas can be transferred back to China whenever necessary, thus simplifying the relevant procedures and daily operations of the enterprises.

Since the pilot programmes for RMB settlements in cross-border trade were launched in 2009, based on market-oriented principles, the PBC has been constantly pursuing policies on cross-border RMB business to meet market players’ needs, facilitate their cross-border trade and investment so as to avoid foreign exchange risks and reduce financial costs.

Published in Dawn, January 12th, 2018
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top