sayareakd
Mod
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 17,734
- Likes
- 18,951
Already done that. Now going to next stage.................Why don't they test a straight path first and then get to the turns and height differentials later on?
Already done that. Now going to next stage.................Why don't they test a straight path first and then get to the turns and height differentials later on?
Exactly...it seems they are always setting up for a highly public spectacular failure...tests are not the simplest ones...announced in public beforehand with much fanfare...not sure about the logic in thisWhy don't they test a straight path first and then get to the turns and height differentials later on?
Great. I did not find any report that mentioned this. Remember only the 3 failures and 1 test that did not take place during December last.Already done that. Now going to next stage.................
Developmental tests are not something people announce as these are not meant for showcasing capability but to get a better understanding of the working. Only the tests of missiles that are done in a routine manner or that has completed development are to be announced to showcase the capability. Announcing developmental trials beforehand is foolish.Exactly...it seems they are always setting up for a highly public spectacular failure...tests are not the simplest ones...announced in public beforehand with much fanfare...not sure about the logic in this
Exactly...it seems they are always setting up for a highly public spectacular failure...tests are not the simplest ones...announced in public beforehand with much fanfare...not sure about the logic in this
It doesnot matter if the tests are developemental or operational .... you have to announce them ..... that is the international rule ..... thats why NOTAM and NAVAREA exists .Developmental tests are not something people announce as these are not meant for showcasing capability but to get a better understanding of the working. Only the tests of missiles that are done in a routine manner or that has completed development are to be announced to showcase the capability. Announcing developmental trials beforehand is foolish.
Applies only for ballistic missiles. Cruise missiles need not be announcedIt doesnot matter if the tests are developemental or operational .... you have to announce them ..... that is the international rule ..... thats why NOTAM and NAVAREA exists .
If the test area is in International waters , You have issue NAVAREA .... doesnot matter if its CM or BM or anything else .Applies only for ballistic missiles. Cruise missiles need not be announced
man you have very low opinion of our country and your self.Since we are using a turbojet this time. Which one is it? Russian?
Let them test it first, in the mean time, just keep saying "No to Russian alternative", this is going to worse then Arjun saga, if it is made to fail.Great. I did not find any report that mentioned this. Remember only the 3 failures and 1 test that did not take place during December last.
If the straight path was successful, they would have IMHO done smaller turn tests where the destination would be just a few hundred meters/few kilometers to ensure that the vehicle performs as expected. You don't even have to declare these tests as they can be classified as unit test or integration tests.
Only when you know all the characteristics from smaller tests and endurance tests from static stations should they have gone for the turns.
What surprises me is that they have not announced such successes and are setting up slightly complex ones for the "first" successful flight test.
While I understand that they should/would have done all the necessary tests earlier, from PR perspective they seem to set themselves up for an uphill task.
Pakistan got it by reverse engineering Tomahawk. Isn't doing the same with Kalibr, a better idea?Let them test it first, in the mean time, just keep saying "No to Russian alternative", this is going to worse then Arjun saga, if it is made to fail.
Isn't manik a turbofan not a turbojet? And it was reported in many reports that manik won't power nirbhaya until 2018 end.man you have very low opinion of our country and your self.
India already achieved it during the 2nd flight trial.Exactly...it seems they are always setting up for a highly public spectacular failure...tests are not the simplest ones...announced in public beforehand with much fanfare...not sure about the logic in this
@DRDO_India test fires homegrown subsonic cruise #missile Nirbhay from a defence range off #Odisha coast. @NewIndianXpress
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
R | India developing air-launched version of Nirbhay cruise missile | Strategic Forces | 4 | |
A | Problem in Nirbhay cruise missile identified: Antony | Strategic Forces | 3 | |
M | is Nirbhay Cruise missile better than Babur | Strategic Forces | 1 | |
R | Nirbhay Cruise Missile Pictures | Strategic Forces | 45 |