Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs)

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
lol yeah, plus if you remember Dr. Kalam was originally from ISRO, he was later went to DRDO.
but i think we should thank the americans for having these great ideas of drawing artificial lines - that you cant share knowledge between drdo/isro etc etc ....after-all now they say in the 123 deal that you cant share knowledge ( "resources") between civilian and military reactor establishments .........yessir , yes sir, with pastoral solemnity ! :hail:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,956
Likes
48,882
Country flag
but it think we should thank the americans for having these great ideas that you cant share knowledge between drdo/isro etc etc ....after-all now they say in the 123 deal that you cant share knowledge ( "resources") between civilian and military reactor establishments .........yessir , yes sir, with pastoral solemnity ! :hail:
The 123 agreement is flexible all the Fast breeder reactors are on the military side offering huge
leverage for the future in terms of energy,security and possibly nuclear fuel used in spaceships etc...
 

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Indian authorities along with DRDO have been spreading misinformation as far as missile program goes. Forget A6, A5 itself is going be to MIRVd. It was said right after the test. In fact A5 will be tested in MIRV config next time.

All this hiding of range and calling the A6 a 6000 kms range missile etc is a case of maintaining ambiguity.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,438
Likes
1,189
Country flag
MIRV requires more than just a launch vehicle that can hold multiple warheads/satellites. It requires warheads which are capable of independent target tracking with a combination of inertial/stellar/GPS sensors.

Such targeting technology/infrastructure is likely the obstacle facing India; India would be well-advised to build up its own network of GPS satellites in light of the fact that GPS, COMPASS, and Beidou may all be unavailable in a South Asian crisis, dramatically reducing the effectiveness of all its precision weaponry, not just its independently-targeted nuclear warheads.
have you heard something about GLONASS or IRNSS!well if you haven't heard about them lemme help you in this matter.
IRNSS(Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System)
The Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS) is an autonomous regional satellite navigation system being developed by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)[1] which would be under complete control of the Indian government. The requirement of such a navigation system is driven by the fact that access to Global Navigation Satellite Systems, GPS, is not guaranteed in hostile situations. The IRNSS would provide two services, with the Standard Positioning Service open for civilian use and the Restricted Service, encrypted one, for authorised users (military).
Development

The first satellite of the proposed constellation, developed at a cost of 16 billion (US$290 million),[2] is expected to be launched during 2012–2013 while the full constellation is planned to be realised around 2014.[3]
A goal of complete Indian control has been stated, with the space segment, ground segment and user receivers all being built in India. Three satellites will be in geostationary orbit over the Indian Ocean. Missile targeting could be an important military application for the constellation.[4]
[edit]Time-frame

Reports came in Apr 2010 that India plans to start launching satellites by the end of 2011, at a rate of one satellite every six months. This will make the IRNSS optimally functional by 2014.[5] India also launched 3 new satellites into space to supplement this.[6]
Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System (IRNSS-1) will be the first of the total seven satellites of the IRNSS constellation. It will have a lift off mass of 1380 kg and operate a navigation payload and a C-band ranging transponder and employ an optimised I-1K bus structure with a power handling capability of 1600W and is designed for a nominal mission life of 7 years.[7]
IRNSS-1 will be launched on-board PSLV-C22 during the second half of 2012 while the full constellation is planned to be realised by 2014.[7][8]
[edit]Description



IRNSS architecture
The proposed system would consist of a constellation of seven satellites and a support ground segment. Three of the satellites in the constellation will be placed in geostationary orbit. These GEOs will be located at 34 East 83 East and 132 East longitude. The GSOs will be in orbits with a 24,000 km apogee and 250 km perigee inclined at 29 degrees. Two of the GSOs will cross the equator at 55 East and two at 111 East. [9] Such an arrangement would mean all seven satellites would have continuous radio visibility with Indian control stations. The satellite payloads would consist of atomic clocks and electronic equipment to generate the navigation signals.
According to a presentation by A. Bhaskaranarayana, Director SCP/FMO & Scientific Secretary of the Indian Space Research Organisation, to a meeting of COSPAR in Montreal on 15 July 2008, IRNSS signals will consist of a Special Positioning Service and a Precision Service. Both will be carried on L5 (1176.45 MHz) and S band (2492.08 MHz). The SPS signal will be modulated by a 1 MHz BPSK signal. The Precision Service will use BOC(5,2).
The navigation signals themselves would be transmitted in the S-band frequency (2–4 GHz) and broadcast through a phased array antenna to maintain required coverage and signal strength. The satellites would weigh approximately 1,330 kg and their solar panels generate 1,400 watts.
The System is intended to provide an absolute position accuracy of better than 10 meters throughout Indian Landmass and better than 20 meters in the Indian ocean as well as a region extending approximately 2,000 km around India.[10]
The ground segment of IRNSS constellation would consist of a Master Control Center (MCC), ground stations to track and estimate the satellites' orbits and ensure the integrity of the network (IRIM), and additional ground stations to monitor the health of the satellites with the capability of issuing radio commands to the satellites (TT&C stations). The MCC would estimate and predict the position of all IRNSS satellites, calculate integrity, makes necessary ionospheric and clock corrections and run the navigation software. In pursuit of a highly independent system, an Indian standard time infrastructure would also be established.
Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GLONASS( Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema)
GLONASS (Russian: ГЛОНАСС; IPA: [ɡlɐˈnas] - Глобальная Навигационная Спутниковая Система), acronym for Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema or Global Navigation Satellite System, is a radio-based satellite navigation system operated by the Russian Aerospace Defence Forces. It both complements and provides an alternative to the United States' Global Positioning System (GPS) and is the only alternative navigational system in operation with global coverage and of comparable precision.
Development of GLONASS began in the Soviet Union in 1976. Beginning on 12 October 1982, numerous rocket launches added satellites to the system until the "constellation" was completed in 1995. During the 2000s, under Vladimir Putin's presidency, the restoration of the system was made a top government priority and funding was substantially increased. GLONASS is the most expensive program of the Russian Federal Space Agency, consuming a third of its budget in 2010.
By 2010, GLONASS had achieved 100% coverage of Russia's territory and in October 2011, the full orbital constellation of 24 satellites was restored, enabling full global coverage. The GLONASS satellites' designs have undergone several upgrades, with the latest version being GLONASS-K.
Inception and design


A GLONASS satellite
The first satellite-based radio navigation system developed in the Soviet Union was Tsiklon, which had the purpose of providing ballistic missile submarines a method for accurate positioning. 31 Tsiklon satellites were launched between 1967 and 1978. The main problem with the system was that, although highly accurate for stationary or slow-moving ships, it required several hours of observation by the receiving station to fix a position, making it unusable for many navigation purposes and for the guidance of the new generation of ballistic missiles.[1] In 1968–1969, a new navigation system, which would support not only the navy, but also the air, land and space forces, was conceived. Formal requirements were completed in 1970; in 1976, the government made a decision to launch development of the "Unified Space Navigation System GLONASS".[2]
The task of designing GLONASS was given to a group of young specialists at NPO PM in the city of Krasnoyarsk-26 (today called Zheleznogorsk). Under the leadership of Vladimir Cheremisin, they developed different proposals, from which the institute's director Grigory Chernyavsky selected the final one. The work was completed in the late 1970s; the system would consist of 24 satellites operating at an altitude of 20,000 km in medium circular orbit. It would be able to promptly fix the receiving station's position based on signals from 4 satellites, and also reveal the object's speed and direction. The satellites would be launched 3 at a time on the heavy-lift Proton rocket. Due to the large number of satellites needed for the program, NPO PM delegated the manufacturing of the satellites to PO Polyot in Omsk, which had better production capabilities.[3][4]
Originally, GLONASS was designed to have an accuracy of 65 m, but in reality it had an accuracy of 20 m in the civilian signal and 10 m in the military signal.[5] The first generation GLONASS satellites were 7.8 m tall, had a width of 7.2 m, measured across their solar panels, and a mass of 1,260 kg.[5]
[edit]Achieving full orbital constellation
In the early 1980s, NPO PM received the first prototype satellites from PO Polyot for ground tests. Many of the produced parts were of low quality and NPO PM engineers had to perform substantial redesigning, leading to a delay.[3] On 12 October 1982, three satellites, designated Kosmos-1413, Kosmos-1414, and Kosmos-1415 were launched aboard a Proton rocket. As only one GLONASS satellite was ready in time for the launch instead of the expected three, it was decided to launch it along with two mock-ups. The American media reported the event as a launch of one satellite and "two secret objects." For a long time, the Americans could not find out the nature of those "objects". The Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union (TASS) covered the launch, describing GLONASS as a system "created to determine positioning of civil aviation aircraft, navy transport and fishing-boats of the Soviet Union".[3]
From 1982 through April 1991, the Soviet Union successfully launched a total of 43 GLONASS-related satellites plus five test satellites. When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, twelve functional GLONASS satellites in two planes were operational; enough to allow limited usage of the system (to cover the entire territory of the country, 18 satellites would have been necessary.) The Russian Federation took over control of the constellation and continued its development.[4] In 1993, the system, now consisting of 12 satellites, was formally declared operational[6] and in December 1995, the constellation was finally brought to its optimal status of 24 operational satellites. This brought the precision of GLONASS on-par with the American GPS system, which had achieved full operational capability а year earlier.[4]
[edit]Economic crisis and fall into disrepair
Since the first generation satellites operated for 3 years each, to keep the system at full capacity, two launches per year would have been necessary to maintain the full network of 24 satellites. However, in the financially difficult period of 1989–1999, the space program's funding was cut by 80% and Russia consequently found itself unable to afford this launch rate. After the full complement was achieved in December 1995, there were no further launches until December 1999. As a result, the constellation reached its lowest point of just 6 operational satellites in 2001. As a prelude to demilitarisation, responsibility of the program was transferred from the Ministry of Defence to Russia's civilian space agency Roscosmos.[5]
[edit]Renewed efforts and modernization


President Vladimir Putin with a GLONASS car navigation device. As President, Putin paid special attention to the development of GLONASS.
In the 2000s, under Vladimir Putin's presidency, the Russian economy recovered and state finances improved considerably. Putin himself took special interest in GLONASS[5] and the system's restoration was made one of the government's top priorities.[7] For this purpose, on August 2001, the Federal Targeted Program "Global Navigation System" 2002–2011 (Government Decision No. 587) was launched. The program was given a budget of $420 million[8] and aimed at restoring the full constellation by 2009.
On 10 December 2003, the second generation satellite design, GLONASS-M, was launched for the first time. It had a slightly larger mass than the baseline GLONASS, standing at 1,415 kg, but it had double the original's lifetime, decreasing the required replacement rate by 50%. The new satellite also had better accuracy and ability to broadcast two extra civilian signals.
In 2006, Defence Minister Sergey Ivanov ordered one of the signals (with an accuracy of 30 m) to be made available to civilian users. Putin, however, was not satisfied with this, and demanded that the whole system should be made fully available to everyone. Consequently, on 18 May 2007, all restrictions were lifted.[6][9] The accurate, formerly military-only signal with a precision of 10 m, has since then been freely available to civilian users.
During the middle of the first decade of 21st century, the Russian economy boomed, resulting in substantial increases in the country's space budget. In 2007, the financing of the GLONASS program was increased considerably; its budget was more than doubled. While in 2006 the GLONASS had received $181 million from the federal budget, in 2007 the amount was increased to $380 million.[6]
In the end, 140.1 billion rubles ($4.7 billion) were spent on the program 2001–2011, making it Roscosmos' largest project and consuming a third of its 2010 budget of 84.5 billion rubles.[10]
[edit]Restoring full capacity
In June 2008, the system consisted of 16 satellites, 12 of which were fully operational at the time. At this point, Roscosmos aimed at having a full constellation of 24 satellites in orbit by 2010, one year later than previously planned.[11]
In September 2008, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin signed a decree allocating additional 67 billion rubles (2.6 billion USD) to GLONASS from the federal budget.[12]
[edit]Promoting commercial use


Yo-mobil is planned to be equipped with GLONASS/GPS navigation device


The iPhone 4S was the first Apple product using both GPS and GLONASS navigation.
Although the GLONASS constellation has reached global coverage, its commercialisation, especially development of the user segment, has been lacking compared to the American GPS system. For example, the first commercial Russian-made GLONASS navigation device for cars, Glospace SGK-70, was introduced in 2007, but it was much bigger and more costly than similar GPS receivers.[7] In late 2010, there were only a handful of GLONASS receivers on the market, and few of them were meant for ordinary consumers. To improve the situation, the Russian government has been actively promoting GLONASS for civilian use.[13]
To improve development of the user segment, on August 11, 2010, Sergei Ivanov announced a plan to introduce a 25% import duty on all GPS-capable devices, including mobile phones, unless they are compatible with GLONASS. As well, the government is planning to force all car manufacturers in Russia to make cars with GLONASS starting from 2011. This will affect all car makers, including foreign brands like Ford and Toyota, which have car assembly facilities in Russia.[14]
GPS and phone baseband chips from major vendors ST-Ericsson,[15] Broadcom[16] and Qualcomm all support GLONASS in combination with GPS.
In April 2011, Sweden's Swepos, a national network of satellite reference stations which provides data for real-time positioning with meter accuracy, became the first known foreign company to use GLONASS.[17]
Smartphones and Tablets also saw implementation of GLONASS support in 2011 with devices released that year from Xiaomi Tech Company (Xiaomi Phone 2), Sony Ericsson, Samsung (the Google Nexus 10 in late 2012), Asus, Apple (iPhone 4S and iPad Mini in late 2012) and HTC adding support for the system allowing increased accuracy and lock on speed in difficult conditions.
Finishing the constellation

This article is outdated. Please update this section to reflect recent events or newly available information. (August 2012)
Russia's aim of finishing the constellation in 2010 suffered a setback when a December 2010 launch of three GLONASS-M satellites failed. The Proton-M rocket itself performed flawlessly, but the upper stage Blok DM3 (a new version which was to make its maiden flight) was loaded with too much fuel due to a sensor failure. As a result, the upper stage and the three satellites crashed into the Pacific Ocean. Kommersant estimated that the launch failure cost up to $160 million.[21] Russian President Dmitry Medvedev ordered a full audit of the entire program and an investigation into the failure.[22]
Following the mishap, Roscosmos activated two reserve satellites and decided to make the first improved GLONASS-K satellite, to be launched in February 2011, part of the operational constellation instead of mainly for testing as was originally planned. This would bring the total number of satellites to 23, obtaining almost complete worldwide coverage. The second GLONASS-K will be ready within three to four months.[23]
In 2010, President Dmitry Medvedev ordered the government to prepare a new federal targeted program for GLONASS, covering the years 2012–2020. The original 2001 program is scheduled to end in 2011.[21] On 22 June 2011, Roscosmos revealed that the agency was looking for a funding of 402 billion rubles ($14.35 billion) for the program. The funds would be spent on maintaining the satellite constellation, on developing and maintaining navigational maps as well as on sponsoring supplemental technologies to make GLONASS more attractive to users.[24]
On 2 October 2011 the 24th satellite of the system, a GLONASS-M, was successfully launched from Plesetsk Cosmodrome and is now in service.[25] This made the GLONASS constellation fully restored, for the first time since 1996.[26] Four more GLONASS-M satellites (reserve ones) will be launched before the end of 2011, and subsequently the GLONASS-K generation will come to replace the older satellites of the system.[25]
On 5 November 2011 the Proton-M booster successfully put three GLONASS-M units in final orbit.[27]
On Monday 28 November 2011, a Soyuz rocket, launched from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome Space Centre, placed a single GLONASS-M satellite into orbit into Plane 3.
[edit]System description



Comparison of GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and Compass (medium earth orbit) satellite navigation system orbits with the International Space Station, Hubble Space Telescope and Iridium constellation orbits, Geostationary Earth Orbit, and the nominal size of the Earth.[a] The Moon's orbit is around 9 times larger (in radius and length) than geostationary orbit.
GLONASS is a global satellite navigation system, providing real time position and velocity determination for military and civilian users. The satellites are located in middle circular orbit at 19,100 km altitude with a 64.8 degree inclination and a period of 11 hours and 15 minutes.[28][29] GLONASS' orbit makes it especially suited for usage in high latitudes (north or south), where getting a GPS signal can be problematic.[5][7] The constellation operates in three orbital planes, with 8 evenly spaced satellites on each.[29] A fully operational constellation with global coverage consists of 24 satellites, while 18 satellites are necessary for covering the territory of Russia. To get a position fix, the receiver must be in the range of at least four satellites, three of which will be used to determine the user's location and the fourth to synchronise clocks of the receiver and the three other spacecraft.[28]
[edit]Signals


A Russian military rugged, combined GLONASS/GPS receiver
GLONASS satellites transmit two types of signal: a standard precision (SP) signal and an obfuscated high precision (HP) signal.
The signals use similar DSSS encoding and binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) modulation as in GPS signals. All GLONASS satellites transmit the same code as their SP signal; however each transmits on a different frequency using a 15-channel frequency division multiple access (FDMA) technique spanning either side from 1602.0 MHz, known as the L1 band. The center frequency is 1602 MHz + n × 0.5625 MHz, where n is a satellite's frequency channel number (n=−7,−6,−5,...0,...,6, previously n=0,...,13). Signals are transmitted in a 38° cone, using right-hand circular polarization, at an EIRP between 25 to 27 dBW (316 to 500 watts). Note that the 24-satellite constellation is accommodated with only 15 channels by using identical frequency channels to support antipodal (opposite side of planet in orbit) satellite pairs, as these satellites will never be in view of an earth-based user at the same time.
The HP signal (L2) is broadcast in phase quadrature with the SP signal, effectively sharing the same carrier wave as the SP signal, but with a ten-times-higher bandwidth than the SP signal.
The L2 signals use the same FDMA as the L1 band signals, but transmit straddling 1246 MHz with the center frequency determined by the[clarification needed] equation 1246 MHz + n×0.4375 MHz, where n spans the same range as for L1.[30] Other details of the HP signal have not been disclosed.


A combined GLONASS/GPS Personal Radio Beacon
At peak efficiency, the SP signal offers horizontal positioning accuracy within 5–10 meters, vertical positioning within 15 meters, a velocity vector measuring within 10 cm/s, and timing within 200 ns, all based on measurements from four first-generation satellites simultaneously;[31] newer satellites such as GLONASS-M improve on this. The more accurate HP signal is available for authorized users, such as the Russian Military, yet unlike the US P(Y) code which is modulated by an encrypting W code, the GLONASS P codes are broadcast in the clear using only 'security through obscurity'. Use of this signal bears risk however as the modulation (and therefore the tracking strategy) of the data bits on the L2P code has recently changed from unmodulated to 250 bit/s burst at random intervals. The GLONASS L1P code is modulated at 50 bit/s without a manchester meander code, and while it carries the same orbital elements as the CA code, it allocates more bits to critical Luni-Solar acceleration parameters and clock correction terms.
An additional civil reference signal is broadcast in the L2 band with an identical SP code to the L1 band signal. This is available from all satellites in the constellation, except satellite number 795 which is the last of the inferior original GLONASS design, and one partially inoperable GLONASS-M satellite which is broadcasting only in the L1 band. (See Информационно-аналитический центр контроля ГЛОНАСС и GPS for daily updates on constellation status.)
GLONASS uses a coordinate datum named "PZ-90" (Earth Parameters 1990 – Parametry Zemli 1990), in which the precise location of the North Pole is given as an average of its position from 1900 to 1905. This is in contrast to the GPS's coordinate datum, WGS 84, which uses the location of the North Pole in 1984. As of September 17, 2007 the PZ-90 datum has been updated to version PZ-90.02 which differ from WGS 84 by less than 40 cm (16 in) in any given direction.
[edit]CDMA signals
Since 2008, new CDMA signals are being researched for use with GLONASS.
Roadmap of GLONASS modernization
Satellite series Launch Current status 1602 + n×0.5625 MHz
(L1, FDMA) 1575.42 MHz
(L1, CDMA) 1246 + n×0.4375 MHz
(L2, FDMA) 1242 MHz
(L2, CDMA) 1207.14 MHz
(L3, CDMA) 1176.45 MHz
(L5, CDMA) Clock error
GLONASS 1982 Out of service L1OF, L1SF L2SF 5×10−13
GLONASS-M 2003 In service L1OF, L1SF L2OF, L2SF 1×10−13
GLONASS-K1 2011 In service L1OF, L1SF L2OF, L2SF L3OС "  5×10−14-1×10−13
GLONASS-K2 2013 Design phase L1OF, L1SF L1OC, L1SC L2OF, L2SF L2SC L3OC 5×10−14
GLONASS-KМ 2015 Research phase L1OF, L1SF L1OC, L1OCM, L1SC L2OF, L2SF L2OC, L2SC L3OC L5OC
"O": open signal (standard precision), "S": obfuscated signal (high precision); "F":FDMA , "С":CDMA; n=−7,−6,−5,...,6
" Glonass-K1 series use 1202.025 MHz for the L3OC signal
The latest Glonass-K1 satellites to be launched in 2011–2012 will introduce an additional open CDMA signal for testing purposes, located in the L3 band at 1202.025 MHz. Glonass-K2 satellites, to be launched in 2013–2015, will relocate the L3 signal to 1207.14 MHz and add an additional open CDMA signal located at 1575.42 MHz in the L1 band; subsequent Glonass-KM satellites to be launched after 2015 will feature additional open CDMA signals – one on existing L1 frequency, one at 1242 MHz in the L2 band, and one at 1176.45 MHz in the L5 band. Glonass-KM will probably broadcast obfuscated CDMA signals in existing L1 and L2 bands.[32][33][34][35][36][37]
Although the format and modulation of GLONASS CDMA signals are not finalized, preliminary statements from developers indicate that the new signals are essentially GPS/Galileo/COMPASS format signals placed at the same frequencies. The open signal in the L1 band will use BOC(1,1) modulation centered at 1575.42 MHz, similarly to corresponding modernized GPS signals in L1 band and Galileo/COMPASS signal E1. The open signal in the L5 band will use BOC(4,4) modulation centered at 1176.45 MHz, the same as the GPS "Safety of Life" (L5) and Galileo signal E5a;[38] the open signal in the L3 band will use QPSK(10) modulation centered at 1207.14 MHz, the same frequency as Galileo/COMPASS signal E5b, and will contain information and pilot components.[34] Such an arrangement will allow easier and cheaper implementation of multi-standard GNSS receivers.
Binary phase-shift keying (BPSK) is used by standard GPS and GLONASS signals, however both BPSK and quadrature phase-shift keying (QPSK) can be considered as variations of quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM), specifically QAM-2 and QAM-4. Binary offset carrier (BOC) is the modulation used by Galileo, modernized GPS, and COMPASS.
With the introduction of CDMA signals, the constellation will be expanded to 30 active satellites by 2025; this may require eventual deprecation of FDMA signals.[39] The new satellites will be deployed into three additional planes, bringing the total to six planes from the current three, aided by System for Differential Correction and Monitoring (SDCM) which uses augmentation satellites such as Luch-5A launched in December 2011 and a network of ground-based control stations.[40] Additional SDCM satellites may use Molniya orbit or Tundra orbit for increased regional availability, similar to Japanese QZSS system.[34]
[edit]Satellites
The main contractor of the GLONASS program is Joint Stock Company Reshetnev Information Satellite Systems (formerly called NPO-PM). The company, located in Zheleznogorsk, is the designer of all GLONASS satellites, in cooperation with the Institute for Space Device Engineering (ru:РНИИ КП) and the Russian Institute of Radio Navigation and Time. Serial production of the satellites is accomplished by the company PC Polyot in Omsk.
Over the three decades of development, the satellite designs have gone through numerous improvements, and can be divided into three generations: the original GLONASS (since 1982), GLONASS-M (since 2003) and GLONASS-K (since 2011). Each GLONASS satellite has a GRAU designation 11F654, and each of them also has the military "Cosmos-NNNN" designation.[41]
[edit]First generation
The true first generation of GLONASS (also called Uragan) satellites were all 3-axis stabilized vehicles, generally weighing 1,250 kg and were equipped with a modest propulsion system to permit relocation within the constellation. Over time they were upgraded to Block IIa, IIb, and IIv vehicles, with each block containing evolutionary improvements.
Six Block IIa satellites were launched in 1985–1986 with improved time and frequency standards over the prototypes, and increased frequency stability. These spacecraft also demonstrated a 16-month average operational lifetime. Block IIb spacecraft, with a 2-year design lifetimes, appeared in 1987, of which a total of 12 were launched, but half were lost in launch vehicle accidents. The six spacecraft that made it to orbit worked well, operating for an average of nearly 22 months.
Block IIv was the most prolific of the first generation. Used exclusively from 1988 to 2000, and continued to be included in launches through 2005, a total of 25 satellites were launched. The design life was three years, however numerous spacecraft exceeded this, with one late model lasting 68 months.[42]
Block II satellites were typically launched three at a time from the Baikonur Cosmodrome using Proton-K Blok-DM-2 or Proton-K Briz-M boosters. The only exception was when, on two launches, an Etalon geodetic reflector satellite was substituted for a GLONASS satellite.
[edit]Second generation
The second generation of satellites, known as Glonass-M, were developed beginning in 1990 and first launched in 2003. These satellites possess a substantially increased lifetime of seven years and weigh slightly more at 1,480 kg. They are approximately 2.4 m (7 ft 10 in) in diameter and 3.7 m (12 ft) high, with a solar array span of 7.2 m (24 ft) for an electrical power generation capability of 1600 watts at launch. The aft payload structure houses 12 primary antennas for L-band transmissions. Laser corner-cube reflectors are also carried to aid in precise orbit determination and geodetic research. On-board cesium clocks provide the local clock source.
A total of fourteen second generation satellites were launched through the end of 2007. As with the previous generation, the second generation spacecraft were launched in triplets using Proton-K Blok-DM-2 or Proton-K Briz-M boosters.
[edit]Third generation


A GLONASS-K satellite model displayed at CeBIT 2011
Main article: GLONASS-K
GLONASS-K is a substantial improvement of the previous generation: it is the first unpressurised GLONASS satellite with a much reduced mass (750 kg versus 1,450 kg of GLONASS-M). It has an operational lifetime of 10 years, compared to the 7-year lifetime of the second generation GLONASS-M. It will transmit more navigation signals to improve the system's accuracy, including new CDMA signals in the L3 and L5 bands which will use modulation similar to modernized GPS, Galileo and Compass.[43][44][45] The new satellite's advanced equipment—made solely from Russian components—will allow the doubling of GLONASS' accuracy.[28] As with the previous satellites, these are 3-axis stabilized, nadir pointing with dual solar arrays.[citation needed] The first GLONASS-K satellite was successfully launched on 26 February 2011.[43][46]
Due to their weight reduction, GLONASS-K spacecraft can be launched in pairs from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome launch site using the substantially lower cost Soyuz-2.1b boosters or in six-at-once from the Baikonur Cosmodrome using Proton-K Briz-M launch vehicles.[28][29]
[edit]Ground control
The ground control segment of GLONASS is almost entirely located within former Soviet Union territory, except for a station in Brasilia, Brazil.[47] The Ground Control Center and Time Standards is located in Moscow and the telemetry and tracking stations are in Saint Petersburg, Ternopol, Eniseisk, and Komsomolsk-na-Amure.[48]
[edit]Receivers
Septentrio, Topcon, C-Nav, JAVAD, Magellan Navigation, Novatel, Leica Geosystems, Hemisphere GPS and Trimble Inc produce GNSS receivers making use of GLONASS. NPO Progress describes a receiver called "GALS-A1" which combines GPS and GLONASS reception. SkyWave Mobile Communications manufactures an Inmarsat-based satellite communications terminal that uses both GLONASS and GPS.[49] As of 2011, some of the latest receivers in the Garmin eTrex line also support GLONASS (along with GPS).[50] Various smartphones from 2011 onwards have integrated GLONASS capability, including devices from Xiaomi Tech Company (Xiaomi Phone 2), Sony Ericsson,[51] ZTE, Huawei,[52] Samsung (Galaxy Note, Galaxy Note II, Galaxy S3),[53] Apple (iPhone 4S, iPhone 5),[54] iPad Mini (LTE model only)[55] and iPad (3rd generation, 4G model only)),[56] HTC,[57] LG [58]Motorola[59] and Nokia.[60]
[edit]Status

[edit]Availability


Map showing values of position geometry factor PDOP on the Earth surface (the mask angle: 5°) on 6 January 2012 13:47:51 UTC
As of 8 January 2013, the GLONASS constellation status is:[61]
Total Satellites in Constellation 29 SC
Operational 23 SC (Glonass-M)
In Commissioning 0 SC
In Flight-test 1 SC (Glonass-K)
In Maintenance 2 SC (Glonass-M)
Spare 3 SC (Glonass-M)
In Decommissioning –
The system requires 18 satellites for continuous navigation services covering the entire territory of the Russian Federation, and 24 satellites to provide services worldwide.[62] The GLONASS system covers 100% of worldwide territory.
[edit]Accuracy


Integral navigation availability for GLONASS customer (PDOP≤6) on the diurnal range for elevation not less than 5 degrees on 6 January 2012
According to Russian System of Differentional Correction and Monitoring's data, as of 2010, precisions of GLONASS navigation definitions (for p=0.95) for latitude and longitude were 4.46—7.38 m with mean number of NSV equals 7—8 (depending on station). In comparison, the same time precisions of GPS navigation definitions were 2.00—8.76 m with mean number of NSV equals 6—11 (depending on station).[citation needed] Civilian GLONASS used alone is therefore very slightly less accurate than GPS. On high latitudes (north or south), GLONASS' accuracy is better than that of GPS due to the orbital position of the satellites.[63]
Some modern receivers are able to use both GLONASS and GPS satellites together, providing greatly improved coverage in urban canyons and giving a very fast time to fix due to over 50 satellites being available. In indoor, urban canyon or mountainous areas, accuracy can be greatly improved over using GPS alone. For using both navigation systems simultaneously, precisions of GLONASS/GPS navigation definitions were 2.37—4.65 m with mean number of NSV equals 14—19 (depends on station).
In May 2009, Anatoly Perminov the then director of the Russian Federal Space Agency stated that actions were undertaken to expand GLONASS's constellation and to improve the ground segment in order to increase the navigation definition of GLONASS to an accuracy of 2.8 m by 2011.[64] In particular, the latest satellite design, GLONASS-K has the ability to double the system's accuracy once introduced. The system's ground segment is also to undergo improvements. As of early 2012, sixteen positioning ground stations are under construction in Russia and in the Antarctic at the Bellingshausen and Novolazarevskaya bases. New stations will be built around the southern hemisphere from Brazil to Indonesia. Together, these improvements are expected to bring GLONASS' accuracy to 0.6 m or better by 2020.[65]

GLONASS - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
709
have you heard something about GLONASS or IRNSS!well if you haven't heard about them lemme help you in this matter.
IRNSS(Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System)

Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GLONASS( Globalnaya Navigatsionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema)

GLONASS - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I addressed the possible unavailability of GLONASS, GPS, and Beidou in my earlier post.

There are two issues with IRNSS:

1) It's not ready yet, and it won't be until multiple satellites are in the air - a GPS receiver needs at least three points of reference to properly triangulate its location.

2) It has limited coverage - China's eastern seaboard is effectively out of range, which means any MIRV warheads using the system will be limited to Pakistan as a likely target. Does India really need MIRVs for Pakistan when it already has the BrahMos?
 

DivineHeretic

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2013
Messages
1,153
Likes
1,897
Country flag
Indian authorities along with DRDO have been spreading misinformation as far as missile program goes. Forget A6, A5 itself is going be to MIRVd. It was said right after the test. In fact A5 will be tested in MIRV config next time.

All this hiding of range and calling the A6 a 6000 kms range missile etc is a case of maintaining ambiguity.
Right-O

As of now, it really appears that the capabilities and specs of the "new" Agni VI is really the final and complete form of the Agni V, not a completely new missile. There is also the fact that the Agni V has a payload of 1.5 ton, whereas the previous series had a ton payload capacity. There is no reference anywhere, not even a rumour of India increasung the yield (and by extension the mass) of its nuclear warheads beyond the 200KT limit.

Why go for this extra payload?

Either of two things are going on....
1. The increased payload is being used to effectively limit the demonstrated range to under 5500km
2. The Agni V is destined for MIRV.

My money is on the latter.

And @t_co, fyi you don't need/use GPS or satellite based systems for guidance of BMs. The BMs have been around since before GPS came into existence. They generally use the most basic INS for navigation, though the newer ones also use other seekers and course corrcting guidance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Right-O

As of now, it really appears that the capabilities and specs of the "new" Agni VI is really the final and complete form of the Agni V, not a completely new missile. There is also the fact that the Agni V has a payload of 1.5 ton, whereas the previous series had a ton payload capacity. There is no reference anywhere, not even a rumour of India increasung the yield (and by extension the mass) of its nuclear warheads beyond the 200KT limit.

Why go for this extra payload?

Either of two things are going on....
1. The increased payload is being used to effectively limit the demonstrated range to under 5500km
2. The Agni V is destined for MIRV.

My money is on the latter.

And @t_co, fyi you don't need/use GPS or satellite based systems for guidance of BMs. The BMs have been around since before GPS came into existence. They generally use the most basic INS for navigation, though the newer ones also use other seekers and course corrcting guidance.
Talk was to have 3-5 MIRVs. Its there in the A5 thread. It also means that India has attained sufficient miniaturization of nuclear weapons. Our warheads for a 250-300kt range weigh 500kgs or less.

About t_co well don't bother about him. He is paid to do what he does.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

roma

NRI in Europe
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2009
Messages
3,582
Likes
2,538
Country flag
I addressed the possible unavailability of GLONASS, GPS, and Beidou in my earlier post. There are two issues with IRNSS:
1) It's not ready yet, and it won't be until multiple satellites are in the air - a GPS receiver needs at least three points of reference to properly triangulate its location.
2) It has limited coverage - China's eastern seaboard is effectively out of range, which means any MIRV warheads using the system will be limited to Pakistan as a likely target. Does India really need MIRVs for Pakistan when it already has the BrahMos?

bye bye .......looks like the end has come a lot sooner than you expected ......even beaten my expectations ...haahhaahhaah :rofl:
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,951
Country flag
if is our tension how we can get our MIRV into China, you just wait and see the fireworks.
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,242
Likes
7,522
Country flag


Coverage is upto 2500km from Indian Landmass. Beijing is 2300km from Assam.

However for missile targetting, I think IRNSS would never be used as I trust bout China & India's NFU is solid and conventional long range missile strike is just plain stupidity.

I addressed the possible unavailability of GLONASS, GPS, and Beidou in my earlier post.

There are two issues with IRNSS:

1) It's not ready yet, and it won't be until multiple satellites are in the air - a GPS receiver needs at least three points of reference to properly triangulate its location.

2) It has limited coverage - China's eastern seaboard is effectively out of range, which means any MIRV warheads using the system will be limited to Pakistan as a likely target. Does India really need MIRVs for Pakistan when it already has the BrahMos?
 
Last edited:

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
709

Yusuf

GUARDIAN
Super Mod
Joined
Mar 24, 2009
Messages
24,324
Likes
11,757
Country flag
Why do you need GPS for ballistic missile flight?
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,242
Likes
7,522
Country flag
Saya Sir, this is Gagan. Not IRNSS. Gagan is a purely civil system.

GAGAN

The Ministry of Civil Aviation has decided to implement an indigenous Satellite-Based Regional GPS Augmentation System also known as Space-Based Augmentation System (SBAS) as part of the Satellite-Based Communications, Navigation and Surveillance (CNS)/Air Traffic Management (ATM) plan for civil aviation. The Indian SBAS system has been given an acronym GAGAN - GPS Aided GEO Augmented Navigation. A national plan for satellite navigation including implementation of Technology Demonstration System (TDS) over the Indian air space as a proof of concept has been prepared jointly by Airports Authority of India (AAI) and ISRO. TDS was successfully completed during 2007 by installing eight Indian Reference Stations (INRESs) at eight Indian airports and linked to the Master Control Center (MCC) located near Bangalore.

The next major milestone in GAGAN was the conduct of PSAT (Preliminary System Acceptance Testing) which has been successfully completed in Dec 2010. The first GAGAN navigation payload was flown on GSAT-8 which was launched on May 21, 2011 and the second on GSAT-10 launched on 29th September 2012. The Navigation payload on GSAT-10 would provide improved accuracy of GPS signals (of better than 7 meters) to be used by the Airports Authority of India for Civil Aviation requirements.
 

sayareakd

Mod
Joined
Feb 17, 2009
Messages
17,734
Likes
18,951
Country flag
Saya Sir, this is Gagan. Not IRNSS. Gagan is a purely civil system.
in war does it matters what we use as long as it get work done, BTW ISRO has TES which is civilian but was first to be used for military purpose.
 

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,242
Likes
7,522
Country flag
Please check the image I posted. Sats are not arranged in a circular pattern that coverage boundary would be equidistant across all directions (as suggested by the wiki image).

Russia is approx 2000km away towards north, but will not be covered. However east china sea/yellow sea/west australia would be covered in the east and iraq/kuwait/madagascar in the west. The range given in wiki is probably the mean distance.

My source is IIRS employee, not any print media.

Where's your source for the 2500 km number?



Coverage: 1,500–2,000 kilometres (930–1,200 mi) around Indian landmass

Indian Regional Navigational Satellite System - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
Last edited:

arnabmit

Homo Communis Indus
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
6,242
Likes
7,522
Country flag
Yes, but in war time, if GPS access is denied, GAGAN would become useless.

in war does it matters what we use as long as it get work done, BTW ISRO has TES which is civilian but was first to be used for military purpose.
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
709
Why do you need GPS for ballistic missile flight?
If you don't have good terminal guidance for MIRV warheads, your CEP increases dramatically; remember that doubling your CEP means you have to quadruple your radiation yield and increase 8x your blast yield for the same effect. What's more, a MIRV bus can only carry warheads of a set size or smaller, which restricts the yield on your warheads. Instead of carrying a single 3-5 mt warhead, you could only carry warheads of 300-475 kt yield max - and that's assuming you've mastered the art of miniaturizing thermonuclear devices to the same level as the US (W88), China (W88 clones), and Russia (whatever warhead is sitting on the Topol-M).

The most reasonable estimate is that India could deliver maybe 200 kt to a city-sized target with MIRV technology. In that case, then India's nuclear arsenal has no deterrent value against a nuclear state, since India has NFU and India cannot perform counterforce strikes and must directly jump to threatening countervalue strikes against conventional aggression if it wants its nuclear arsenal to have any military use whatsoever.

That is why proper terminal guidance is so critical. You cannot threaten an adversary with hardened C4ISR nodes and thousands of miles of underground tunnels storing nuclear missiles if your own nukes are inaccurate and low-yield.
 

t_co

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
2,538
Likes
709
This goes to the larger point of: just what is India's nuclear arsenal for? Minimum countervalue deterrence against a nuclear state? You do not need MIRV technology for that. MIRV technology is useful for counterforce strikes and, when placed in SLBMs, dealing with assholes at the Pentagon who go to launch-on-warning/first-strike in times of crisis.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top