Agnostic_Indian
Regular Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2010
- Messages
- 930
- Likes
- 246
@Mariner HK
which 160km missile are you talking about ?
which 160km missile are you talking about ?
Last edited by a moderator:
Vympel R-77M range 80km - 160km from high altitude.Its multi-purpose missile for both tactical and strategic aircraft for fire-and-forget use against a range of aircraft from hovering helicopters to high speed, low altitude aircraft. Speed is Mach 4.5 meteor speed is mach 4 range is 60-100 km .@Mariner HK
which 160km missile are you talking about ?
I think it's still under development, even if it's developed not sure whether China is purchasing it or Russia is selling it, if selling it it could be a export version which will not have same performance or configuration. so many questions to be answered.Vympel R-77M range 80km - 160km from high altitude.Its multi-purpose missile for both tactical and strategic aircraft for fire-and-forget use against a range of aircraft from hovering helicopters to high speed, low altitude aircraft. Speed is Mach 4.5 meteor speed is mach 4 range is 60-100 km .
We really do have respect to france defence projects surely for rafale... u please just compare and think once and reply me.What is the rcs of rafale ?Range of meteor missile ?As i am polite, i will not answer...
If you really know at which distance a SU35 can detect a Rafale(and the reverse), your datas value billion dollars.
Let me say one thing : Core Rafale program was deep strike nuke.
Think about it.
Dude our su 30 mki has it chinese and all other russian buyers has this missile... Meteor is developed just get head to head against this heavy weight beast of russia... It was developed in 1984 or 85 ....I think it's still under development, even if it's developed not sure whether China is purchasing it or Russia is selling it, if selling it it could be a export version which will not have same performance or configuration. so many questions to be answered.
what we all have is different version (RVV AE), this is suppose to be a improved version with ramjet propulsion (R-77RVV-AE-PD.)Dude our su 30 mki has it chinese and all other russian buyers has this missile... Meteor is developed just get head to head against this heavy weight beast of russia... It was developed in 1984 or 85 ....
wat ever rafale radar dectection range for 1 m^2 rcs of su 35... first kill ll be from su 35,,... or dig fight decides the rest which i think both are high capable dogfighters... unless u have a real fight we cant determine the result ...As i am polite, i will not answer...
If you really know at which distance a SU35 can detect a Rafale(and the reverse), your datas value billion dollars.
Let me say one thing : Core Rafale program was deep strike nuke.
Think about it.
even mirage 2000 are nuke strikers for india.So mirage better than rafale? even su 30 mki is a multi role fighter bomber,,,tooLet me say one thing : Core Rafale program was deep strike nuke.
Think about it.
again we don't know the detection range of new aesa from rafale, you should calculate the rcs of fighter jet with weapon load, not clean rcs.wat ever rafale radar dectection range for 1 m^2 rcs of su 35... first kill ll be from su 35,,... or dig fight decides the rest which i think both are high capable dogfighters... unless u have a real fight we cant determine the result ...
but we know range of ,eteor and radar dection range of su 35... if rafale have 1 rcs withh fully loaded(impossible) yet su 35 ll detect at 280+ kms... with new generation missile onboard which are highly advanced than one used on su 30s... it will have a clear kill from stand of rang.Even if rafale detect su 35 at 200km with its power full radar... it need to get to a distance of 100 km to home meteor missile on su35... Now it makes sence?why su 35 with chinese is a mater of concern even if u have rafale...again we don't know the detection range of new aesa from rafale, you should calculate the rcs of fighter jet with weapon load, not clean rcs.
refer post #67but we know range of ,eteor and radar dection range of su 35... if rafale have 1 rcs withh fully loaded(impossible) yet su 35 ll detect at 280+ kms... with new generation missile onboard which are highly advanced than one used on su 30s... it will have a clear kill from stand of rang.Even if rafale detect su 35 at 200km with its power full radar... it need to get to a distance of 100 km to home meteor missile on su35... Now it makes sence?why su 35 with chinese is a mater of concern even if u have rafale...
ok ... but india already operate 160 km missile range bvm.... not sure about china but with su 35 they ll get even advanced missile than one used on su 30...let wait and watchrefer post #67
why don't you get it ? what we use is a different version with a range around (R77 RVV-AE) 110 km.ok ... but india already operate 160 km missile range bvm.... not sure about china but with su 35 they ll get even advanced missile than one used on su 30...let wait and watch
Unnecessary waste of money. You never invest in something that only provides an incremental capability.I ll be happy if we had su 35 in our fleet...
Depends on what's on the external stores.But su35 with its 400Km radar which can detect Rafale RCS with in rage of 180 KM
How will Brahmos help?...If it was armed with 160 Km missile or Bramos 300km range ? RAFALE dont even get a chance to fight a battle ... WHAT DO U THINK ABOUT THIS?
Rafale is still an obsolete air to air platform compared to F-22/F-35.As i am polite, i will not answer...
If you really know at which distance a SU35 can detect a Rafale(and the reverse), your datas value billion dollars.
Let me say one thing : Core Rafale program was deep strike nuke.
Think about it.
IAF did not find the Su-35 to be favorable. IAF will induct FGFA instead while upgrading MKI in the meantime.well as an indian we have to thi k the right answer for su35 , mmrca is good but i feel we should cut the order and we should also cut su30 mki order we can go for su35 for some numbers .
sir please let me know how iaf will counter su35 , hou are talking future , pls tell me how to fill the gap .IAF did not find the Su-35 to be favorable. IAF will induct FGFA instead while upgrading MKI in the meantime.
MKI has a very short upgrade cycle and the upgrades will be carried out in phases. So, why would we need Su-35? The upgrades will push it past the Su-35 anyway. The Chinese order for just 24 aircraft is not a threat to India.
MMRCA is supposed to handle a completely different requirement. There is no point even relating it to MKI/Su-35/FGFA. It is for an entirely different purpose and we may see increased orders instead. We are trying to replace our old fighters on a numbers basis while focusing on superior capabilities.
Meaning every Mig-27 squadron is being replaced with a Rafale squadron. Every Mig-21/Mig-23 squadron is being replaced with a MKI squadron (LCA in the future). In the future every Jaguar squadron will eventually be replaced with one or two squadrons of AMCA.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chinese Su 35s vs Indian's Rafale MMRCA winner | Defence & Strategy | 10 | ||
Chinese J-20 stealth aircraft can influence Indian Air Force MMRCA tender | Indian Air Force | 18 | ||
Opinion Su-57 MMRCA choice over Rafale ???? | Indian Air Force | 84 | ||
The Indian Air Force MMRCA Saga | Opinion & Analysis | 1 |