I don´t understand. If India is a democratic country, how come India cannot accept a plebiscit in Kashmir.
Being democratic doesn't mean accepting or conducting voting on everything.
Democracy is for running the country and maintaining accountable governance.
The day implementation of technocracy in India is possible, voting will come to an end and nothing except fundamental rights (and equality laws) will be left there in India's constitution.
I am getting the impression Indians do not understand the meaning of democracy.
Indians very well understand it and how much penetration should be given to it as well.
I know most Indians ( and Pakistanis too) have very little education.
You can claim any bull$h!t. India is far far better than rest most of third world when comes to education and technology and we have both subjective explanations and objective statistics for it.
But at least he forumites here should understand that not accepting the wish of the majority of Kashmiri people is against the principles of democracy.
Forumites here very well understand about meaning and history too what you don't.
That's why you went ahead to call those demanding secession of Kashmir from Indian Union as "Kashmiris" (LOL).
Do you know why there was no such issue in Kashmir before 80s? What happened to Kashmiri Hindus and who migrated to Kashmir to spread their peace?
The mob did everything come out, most of the casualties was done by the mob.
You know the Hongkong situation ?
That's support by USA, if development of India threat to the United States, the same thing will happen in India
Like Germany, Japan, China has experienced
Riots in India too are sponsored by western countries. You think we don't know?
India mostly plays as a centrist swinger and isn't an ally of west either. We have conflicts with west too, even bigger than we have with you.
As I know , British killed more India people ,but most India people don't hate British.
You don't know anything.
Because China has an evil political party, established at the same time,GDP per capital was the same at 1947, China's GDP per capital now is only 10000 US dollars, four times higher than that of India
So evil of CCP!
GDP per capita has little to do with cruelty. Chinese model worked, Indian didn't.
China got Deng to reverse all damage done by Mao, India didn't have anyone to rollback Nehruvian socialism rapidly. Those who wanted to were hindered by "democracy".
What if I tell you that US was no. 1 enemy of India and was supporting China at that time (much more than it does to UK or Japan)?
Most of China's tech & economic skyhighs were aided and oppositions were leneiented by US.
Hongkong is govern by itself.
Because Hongkong's democracy is a piece of shit , and it government is control by rich people.
People at the bottom of Hongkong have no hope for the future, so they will be inspired by the United States.
This is impossible in China
Communists are worse. In democracy, you can touch those people, in authoritarianism, you don't.
USSR collapsed for a reason.
Modi says India is the rape capital. China will not.
China is safe at all times and people trust the government.
The government has done a lot to poor people.
Come to China if you have chance. Don't be fooled by your propaganda
I have visited China and aware that its an upper middle income economy and its average is at par with India's richest states.
But for rapes, India's rape rate is among lowest in world (but is media's target most of the time). For China, it doesn't even submit this data publish this data and higher rates/poor conviction rates per all ambiguous sources.