it seems some loser jump into endless ' trolling ' mode....very strange and childish behavior...LOL
--------------
no one mentions OBOGS here...LOL...such self-approbation is another funny thing...if you learn this "term" some place else and have problem, you may ask your puzzle there ..eg. back to KB forum?... don't use others' words as the weapon waving at me...LOL...
this improvement is focused on the better 'temperature and humidity ' and pressure control ... the 'environment' is also not limited to so called cockpit only but the electronics-bay as well...
-------------
if you think 7-8 years time span is already an 'impatient' one... I can see your should be angry on something else...
BTW, it seem some loser should have a study on how the PAF' CCS works in the PAF pilot training system...LOL...
Oh I see, I must have stepped on your little tail, to have invited such a response.
I am not to blame. Your govt. is which is 'trolling' you. They release a pic ( leak it) and keyboard idiot like you go on overdrive pasting it every forum available. That's not it, you and your cheerleaders then spin all kinds of theories around it.
Two days later, you come with some dubious sources claiming it is
'environmental control system which has been modified for high temperature /humidity conditions', well it can have two meaning
1. component environment system ( engine, radar, intake etc.) or Cockpit eniv. system.
2. Knowing your competence level in tweaking engine performance for H&H conditions. I discounted it.
3.There-fore, I mentioned cockpit system like (On Board Oxygen Generation System) ( It might have other acronym, I don't know). As it is a thing that is still lacking in JF-17 and introduction of which might lead to elimination of Oxygen tanks, which again will pave the way for few more litres of drag-free fuel. Which again is critical for H&H condition where engine performance is not always optimal.
And unless you are a pea-brain, you should have known why I mentioned them.
Also, you may be a member of multiple forum to get multiple income of 50 cents, that's not the case with me.
===============================
Unless you have had a brain-fart, you would know, PAC 'claim' they have a capacity of 16 air-frames/yr expandable to 25. Still from 2007 to 2015 they have produced only 42. ( With only 50% work-share)
So, is the cause of impatience.
Yeah, only a Chinese looser needs to know the workings of CCS. I currently am worried about the delay in delivery of 'used' air-frames.
====================
Further, no need for clarification to drag your sorry ass out Paki context. You always can ask
@Neo to explain.