ISRO General News and Updates

TopWatcher

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2022
Messages
1,715
Likes
4,556
Country flag
Der aaye dhrust ayye. ISRO should focus and prioritize the HLV rockets, then work on other thing.

Once we have heavy rocket, we didn't to think about payload weight anymore.

One question i have, suppose weight of one payload is 100kg under earth, once it leave earth , payload weight must be reduce ?
 

Swesh

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2020
Messages
3,520
Likes
12,180
Not related to anything official from isro but this idiot has blocked literally precious domain that could have used effectively but any of us
@Vamsi @Indx TechStyle @Akula
 

RoaringTigerHiddenDragon

Senior Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2020
Messages
4,070
Likes
17,371
Country flag
Semi cryogenic engines is the final thing to master in non-reusable launch technology. Good that we are getting there sooner.
Next is to build out RLVs to service any space stations we build.
Human rated launch and planetary landing and exploration capabilities must be achieved. Of course by this time NASA would have setup limited habitats on the moon and begin launching deep space rockets and satellites from the moon. Nevertheless, NASA could use ISRO as a partner also.
 

Blademaster

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,548
Likes
27,663
That is equal to Japnese HIIB, close to Ariane 5 ECA and bigger than every rocket in US, Russian, Chinese inventories (except Delta-IV heavy, CZ-5B and Protom-M).
JAXA HII-B is bigger and you left out SpaceX Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.
 

Indx TechStyle

Kitty mod
Mod
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
18,354
Likes
56,576
Country flag
Isn't that Falcon 9(reusable) levels of LEO payload(or are you factoring in launch latitude?)

View attachment 180035
LVM3 is expendable, not reusable. So, irrelevant to discussion.
JAXA HII-B is bigger and you left out SpaceX Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy.
HIIIB is in similar class, slightly bigger. And I off course only accounted NASA systems. Falcon 9 is reusable and heavy is even an SHLV, a rocket of different class. That will better be compared to NGLV when that arrives.
 

Blademaster

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2009
Messages
9,548
Likes
27,663
LVM3 is expendable, not reusable. So, irrelevant to discussion.

HIIIB is in similar class, slightly bigger. And I off course only accounted NASA systems. Falcon 9 is reusable and heavy is even an SHLV, a rocket of different class. That will better be compared to NGLV when that arrives.
As the saying goes, "What color does it matter as long as the cat catches the mouse," what does it matter if it is reusable or not as long as it can carry bigger payload?
 

New threads

Articles

Top