Is India strong enough to face if China-Pak attack together?

ice berg

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2011
Messages
2,145
Likes
292
The rumor has it that india has the tech to use the not so weapon grade spent fuel from it's civilian reactor for converting it into smaller compact thermonuclear devices. If this tech is taken into account the actual number of India's missile deliverable n bomb count beyond 1000. So give some sound advice to your CCP guys before even pressing the defroster buttons in their refrigerators at home.
Another clueless post from you.Weasel words, "the rumour", " 1000 nukes" I had a good laugh at the part of converting civilian reactors to weapon grade thermonuclear devices. Ohh, hahahahah. Another of your gem alongside the LCA bring down F-22 with "stealth" UAVs.:rofl:
 

CCTV

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
678
Likes
24
Yeah yeah your mighty mouse PLA can run over India anytime and we are on your mercy.

So thats the reason you never dared any attack on India since 87 after getting a bloody nose by inferior outnumbered India Army?

btw A Chinese in North America ranting like a typical Paki... identity crisis. :lol:
Your PM Rajiv, the son of Indira, saved your ass. He send his FM to BeiJing at May 1987 to beg for peace,
and the PM himself came to BeiJing 1988.

Rajiv told to people in Uttar Pradesh congress meeting (July ,1987) that the tension at the border is just a rumor form Western countries.
 
Last edited:

Decklander

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
2,654
Likes
4,111
Another clueless post from you.Weasel words, "the rumour", " 1000 nukes" I had a good laugh at the part of converting civilian reactors to weapon grade thermonuclear devices. Ohh, hahahahah. Another of your gem alongside the LCA bring down F-22 with "stealth" UAVs.:rofl:
FYI, We have had a nuke reactor since 1958 and we did acquire bomb tech before you guys to build a bomb but exploded it only in 1974. The count is over 1000 bombs ready and enough fissile material ready to take the count beyound 3000 at short notice.
 

CCTV

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
678
Likes
24
FYI, We have had a nuke reactor since 1958 and we did acquire bomb tech before you guys to build a bomb but exploded it only in 1974. The count is over 1000 bombs ready and enough fissile material ready to take the count beyound 3000 at short notice.
Again, if you said is true, your PM should sign NPT proudly as China, US, Russia , France , England did.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,586
Likes
25,322
Country flag
Your PM Rajiv, the son of Indira, saved your ass. He send his FM to BeiJing at May 1987 to beg for peace,
and the PM himself came to BeiJing 1988.

Rajiv told to people in Uttar Pradesh congress meeting (July ,1987) that the tension at the border is just a rumor form Western countries.
Shut up poser.India saved your ass since we killed many might mouse soldiers and you agreed for "peace" as you found it was not possible to have a war with India.

If you are so brave then come and get Arunachal Pradesh which you claim and cry for always. You are AFRAID.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,438
Likes
1,189
Country flag
Your PM Rajiv, the son of Indira, saved your ass. He send his FM to BeiJing at May 1987 to beg for peace,
and the PM himself came to BeiJing 1988.


Rajiv told to people in Uttar Pradesh congress meeting (July ,1987) that the tension at the border is just a rumor form Western countries.
are you out of your tiny mind!Rajiv Ganshi sent his FM because your Govt. invited him to discuss about the potential conflict like situation at that moment between the two countries.in reality the CCP was sh*t scared of India as it knew it didn't have the power to defeat a force like India at that time:laugh:(it had been only a decade since your mighty PLA was literally a**wh***ed by a "so called" rag tag Vietnamese Armed Forces in '79:rofl:).
according to some confidential reports of that time our COAS Gen.Sundarji had made a plan to mount a preemptive strike inside Tibet and liberate Lhasa from the clutches of the CCP thugs.
India was a formidable force to reckon with during the '80s and used to maintain a significant qualitative advantage over the PLA due to the availability of both Soviet and Western weaponry and equipments which were significantly superior than anything the PLA could field at that time:ranger:
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,438
Likes
1,189
Country flag
Your PM Rajiv, the son of Indira, saved your ass. He send his FM to BeiJing at May 1987 to beg for peace,
and the PM himself came to BeiJing 1988.


*********double posted***********
 
Last edited:

CCTV

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
678
Likes
24
Shut up poser.India saved your ass since we killed many might mouse soldiers and you agreed for "peace" as you found it was not possible to have a war with India.

If you are so brave then come and get Arunachal Pradesh which you claim and cry for always. You are AFRAID.
Again, we are peaceful people, we will do the cost effective way.
If you can open a door by key, why break it?
 

CCTV

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
678
Likes
24
are you out of your tiny mind!Rajiv Ganshi sent his FM because your Govt. invited him to discuss about the potential conflict like situation at that moment between the two countries.in reality the CCP was sh*t scared of India as it knew it didn't have the power to defeat a force like India at that time:laugh:(it had been only a decade since your mighty PLA was literally a**wh***ed by a "so called" rag tag Vietnamese Armed Forces in '79:rofl:).
according to some confidential reports of that time our COAS Gen.Sundarji had made a plan to mount a preemptive strike inside Tibet and liberate Lhasa from the clutches of the CCP thugs.
India was a formidable force to reckon with during the '80s and used to maintain a significant qualitative advantage over the PLA due to the availability of both Soviet and Western weaponry and equipments which were significantly superior than anything the PLA could field at that time:ranger:

If you said is true , then you need to blame Rajiv lost the great chance to defeat China.
 

Decklander

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2012
Messages
2,654
Likes
4,111
Again, if you said is true, your PM should sign NPT proudly as China, US, Russia , France , England did.
You guys are now part of SC of UNO. While we are not. We sign it once we settle our border dispute with you. However I do have very clear thinking that Aksai Chin was never a part of erstwhile J&K state and that part belongs to Tibet. But China has no claim on anyother part of our borders especially in AP. China has raised the bogey of AP only for the purpose of making a counter claim. The truth must be told in its entirity and many Indian members will not agree to my point of view that Aksaichin is not part of Indian territory.
I am pretty sure that once we give up our claim on Aksaichin, there will be no border dispute at all. These two great civilizations will have nothing to fight about after that. We can than hope for an ever lasting peace.
But if you finger me (India), I(India) will shove my leg up where it hurts the most. You must realise that WW1 & WW2 including defeating Japs in China was done by troops provided by India. The west does not have a border with China nor do they have the kind of manpower which India has, so their game is to create trouble between India & China to ensure they can settle scores with China.
China has not been nice by providing nuke tech to Pak against India so we do have an axe to grind against china. we Indians fight our own battles and it is for this reason that we did not commit our troops in Iraq and Afganistan even though US & NATO offered us fantastic discounts and made outstanding offers.
It is upto China as to what road they want to take with India. Even in 1962, the number of PLA troops killed was four times Indian casualties and those Indian casualties were due to stupid planning by Nehru. 1967 Nathu la incident showed what Indians are capable of when you guys lost over 500 men for just a few dozen Indian troops.
You maybe a Dragon, but just remember we are an Elephant. We will crush you uinder our feet.
 

rock127

Maulana Rockullah
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
10,586
Likes
25,322
Country flag
Again, we are peaceful people, we will do the cost effective way.
If you can open a door by key, why break it?
Yeah Peaceful people who run Tanks on it's citizens. :lol:

 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
are you out of your tiny mind!Rajiv Ganshi sent his FM because your Govt. invited him to discuss about the potential conflict like situation at that moment between the two countries.in reality the CCP was sh*t scared of India as it knew it didn't have the power to defeat a force like India at that time:laugh:(it had been only a decade since your mighty PLA was literally a**wh***ed by a "so called" rag tag Vietnamese Armed Forces in '79:rofl:).
according to some confidential reports of that time our COAS Gen.Sundarji had made a plan to mount a preemptive strike inside Tibet and liberate Lhasa from the clutches of the CCP thugs.
India was a formidable force to reckon with during the '80s and used to maintain a significant qualitative advantage over the PLA due to the availability of both Soviet and Western weaponry and equipments which were significantly superior than anything the PLA could field at that time:ranger:
well,
1. In 1980s,CHina's industry chains were outdated,but it was already complete and its industry output by far larger than India's.
In fact, CHina's steel ,oil and other base industry products output were all times more than Indias'...
Besides,CHina could already make all kinds of cannons, tankers ,jets and other weapons by itself and sustain a longterm full war by CHina itself, in spite that those weapons were mainly still 1950s-1960s tech,

2. in 1980s,India owned lots of more advanced weapons ,mainly imported from SOviets. However, India industry chains were not so complete and it could not produce most heavy weapons such as jets,big cannons and heavy vehicles.
So, India could not sustain a longterm war against CHina,without the sopport from a Soviet and USA.
In fact, the weak weapon resupply,caused by weak industry base, is still the deadly weakness of Indian defence force today.


3. In 1987, USA and CHina were in fact "quosi allies" against Soviet. Soviet ,led by Mikhail gorbachev, tried itself to show friendship to CHina,in order to improve its position in cold war..
So, India could not get support from Soviet or USA at all, if India had fought a long term war against China..
in fact, in 1987, Soviet frankly asked india to retreat,that was why India retreated.
 

badguy2000

Respected Member
Senior Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
5,133
Likes
746
in 1987,India army.s weapons indeed were more advanced than PLA's...but those advanded weapons are once-off, when SOviet cancelled their sopport .
 

CCTV

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
678
Likes
24
Yeah Peaceful people who run Tanks on it's citizens. :lol:

The person tried to stop the PLA tanks, since he knew the tank is not going to run on him. This guy is still alive.
I do not think he want to stop a truck on a high way, since those truck driver is not as nice as PLA.
 

CCTV

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
678
Likes
24
You guys are now part of SC of UNO. While we are not. We sign it once we settle our border dispute with you. However I do have very clear thinking that Aksai Chin was never a part of erstwhile J&K state and that part belongs to Tibet. But China has no claim on anyother part of our borders especially in AP. China has raised the bogey of AP only for the purpose of making a counter claim. The truth must be told in its entirity and many Indian members will not agree to my point of view that Aksaichin is not part of Indian territory.
I am pretty sure that once we give up our claim on Aksaichin, there will be no border dispute at all. These two great civilizations will have nothing to fight about after that. We can than hope for an ever lasting peace.
But if you finger me (India), I(India) will shove my leg up where it hurts the most. You must realise that WW1 & WW2 including defeating Japs in China was done by troops provided by India. The west does not have a border with China nor do they have the kind of manpower which India has, so their game is to create trouble between India & China to ensure they can settle scores with China.
China has not been nice by providing nuke tech to Pak against India so we do have an axe to grind against china. we Indians fight our own battles and it is for this reason that we did not commit our troops in Iraq and Afganistan even though US & NATO offered us fantastic discounts and made outstanding offers.
It is upto China as to what road they want to take with India. Even in 1962, the number of PLA troops killed was four times Indian casualties and those Indian casualties were due to stupid planning by Nehru. 1967 Nathu la incident showed what Indians are capable of when you guys lost over 500 men for just a few dozen Indian troops.
You maybe a Dragon, but just remember we are an Elephant. We will crush you uinder our feet.
Why you links NPT to SC in UN? I don't get it?
Do you think India will sign NPT today if SC position is granted?

Or you are saying India not sign NPT becoz of China?
 
Last edited:

mikhail

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
1,438
Likes
1,189
Country flag
Why you links NPT to SC in UN? I don't get it?
Do you think India will sign NPT today if SC position is granted?
look we don't want to fight a war with china,its you guys who are adamant about your alleged claim on Arunachal Pradesh which is an integral part of India,so if you try to invade our Motherland then we don't have any other choice than to ward off your invading force.on the contrary if you declare the LAC as the International Border and give up your claim on A.P. then there will be no more hostility between the two countries(because afaik we are ready to recognize Aksai Chin as a part of China as well) but we can't sign the NPT treaty due to Pakistan's nuclear policy.we'll definitely sign it once the pakis are ready to sign as well
 

CCTV

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2013
Messages
678
Likes
24
Follow by your logic that China, US , Russia and France would not sign NPT, since India and pakistan did not sign yet.

Again, Chinese is peaceful people, we do things peacefully.
 
Last edited:

ersakthivel

Brilliance
Senior Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2011
Messages
7,029
Likes
8,762
Country flag
Another clueless post from you.Weasel words, "the rumour", " 1000 nukes" I had a good laugh at the part of converting civilian reactors to weapon grade thermonuclear devices. Ohh, hahahahah. Another of your gem alongside the LCA bring down F-22 with "stealth" UAVs.:rofl:
you respected bud head ain't got any clue regarding anything scientific is evident from your rants.
you can use some googling to check whether it is true or not.
many 4.5th gens are going to shoot down 5th gens like crows once their stealth bluff is called. of course dyed in the wool CCP types will never get it through their head.
 
Last edited:

J20!

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
2,748
Likes
1,541
Country flag
Is not one nuclear bomb over Beijing good enough...

Do not be such blind tactician..
Not to nitpick or anything, but name one operational nuclear delivery system India has in its stockpiles TODAY that could conceivably reach and successfully attack Beijing with a nuclear payload, BEFORE missile and/or aircraft bases could be destroyed by a Chinese second strike(DF21, DF31, DF41 or even H6K launched DH10 cruise missiles) ... Aircraft or missile based.

Maybe I've missed Agni 5 reaching IOC or something, because as far as I know, India would have to, somehow, fly a Mirage 2000 from the Tibet border to the Yellow Sea to achieve such a strike, because there are no ballistic missiles in India's inventory today that have the throw weight and range to reach Beijing with a nuclear payload from within Indian soil.
 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top