Indian Ocean Developments

Armand2REP

CHINI EXPERT
Senior Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
13,811
Likes
6,734
Country flag
I wouldn't say China is dominating SEA. Burma is the only lifeline China has to bypass the Malacca straits until you get to Pakistan. Vietnam is a bigger threat than it has been at any time before. Russia is arming it to the teeth and US is now friendly with their military. If India really wants to shut down China from operating in the IOR, they need to get Burma on their side. If I was the policy maker, I would be doing everything to make them anti-Chinese.
 

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
As long as Indian maritime interests in IOR are not threatened by PRC, GOI shouldn't partner with US or anyone. It'll only provoke PRC leading to unnecessary tensions. USN's global maritime influence if falling, its their problem & US should deal with it using their NATO allies or any means.

GOI doesn't need to help them in anyway as whatever can be offered by US can turn sides with change in their seasonal Global policy. All we can go for is some 'Strategic-partnership' as Ray sir pointed out. Otherwise GOI is in no need to team up with any party.
 
Last edited:

nrj

Ambassador
Joined
Nov 16, 2009
Messages
9,658
Likes
3,911
Country flag
If India really wants to shut down China from operating in the IOR, they need to get Burma on their side.
Exact hit. I somehow believe that GOI has already started on the same lines from last few months.
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,797
Country flag
India can always LEASE a naval base to USA if necessary on lakswadeep islands or other better choices, it would end China's encroachment in a second.
(I am starting a separate thread on this topic)
 
Last edited:

anoop_mig25

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
5,807
Likes
3,151
Country flag
WHAT ABOUT AMERICAN NAVAL BASE AT DEGARICO(COREECT ME I DONOT KNOW EXCATLIY ) AND THAT OF LEASING NAVAL BASE I DONOT THINK goi of that day agree any proposal like this although people may not dis-agree with the said proposal (i mean they might support it)
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,797
Country flag
WHAT ABOUT AMERICAN NAVAL BASE AT DEGARICO(COREECT ME I DONOT KNOW EXCATLIY ) AND THAT OF LEASING NAVAL BASE I DONOT THINK goi of that day agree any proposal like this although people may not dis-agree with the said proposal (i mean they might support it)
Diego Garcia is British colonial territory, India had no input in this decision.
 

nimo_cn

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
4,032
Likes
883
Country flag
The precondition of being a partner with America or any country else is that they will treat you equally.

So i am wondering, will America treat India equally?
 

deepak75

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2010
Messages
34
Likes
0
The precondition of being a partner with America or any country else is that they will treat you equally.

So i am wondering, will America treat India equally?
Actually the pre-condition of being a partner is not equal treatment but similiar objectives. The investment and the level of risk exposure in the partnership decides the major / other partners.
 

p2prada

Senior Member
Joined
May 25, 2009
Messages
10,234
Likes
4,015
A partnership between India and US is far from possible within this decade. We have too many conflicting views on how the world should be run. Iran, Myanmar and UNSC seat are the most crucial roadblocks to this "partnership."

We have to continue building our navy and make the IONS stronger than it is today. Perhaps one day the IONS will make all decisions when it comes to the Indian Ocean without interference from US, China or France.

A combined Naval force that was first envisioned in the American 1000 ship navy speech is far from reality if India is included. Our forces will take orders only from Indian or UN high command(when required) and no one else. This was declared when the Americans wanted to take command of Indian troops sent to Afghanistan.

The Chinese are far behind if they want a capable presence in the IOR. They need to first have a proper presence in the Pacific before coming to our backyard and the Japanese are a force to be reckoned with.

@Armand
India cannot tilt Myanmar away from China without a UNSC seat.
 

RPK

Indyakudimahan
Senior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
4,970
Likes
229
Country flag
Medical helicopter makes debut on PLA hospital ship in Indian Ocean

New model of rescue medical helicopter makes debut on PLA hospital ship in Indian Ocean - People's Daily Online
September 15, 2010


A new model of rescue medical helicopter is seen aboard hospital ship Peace Ark of the Navy of the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) prior to its takeoff during an exercise in the sea area of Indian Ocean, Sept. 14, 2010. The helicopter made its first debut on Monday after successfully accomplishing the landfall task on the board of Peace Ark. (Xinhua/Zha Chunming)

Two Chinese soldiers polite a new model of rescue medical helicopter during an exercise in the sea area of Indian Ocean, Sept. 14, 2010. The helicopter made its first debut on Monday after successfully accomplishing the landfall task on the board of hospital ship Peace Ark of the Navy of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. (Xinhua/Zha Chunming)

Liu Bingli, head of a medical team on a new model of rescue medical helicopter, participates in an exercise in the sea area of Indian Ocean, Sept. 14, 2010. The helicopter made its first debut on Monday after successfully accomplishing the landfall task on the board of hospital ship Peace Ark of the Navy of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. (Xinhua/Zha Chunming)

A member of a medical team on a new model of rescue medical helicopter, participates in an exercise in the sea area of Indian Ocean, Sept. 14, 2010. The helicopter made its first debut on Monday after successfully accomplishing the landfall task on the board of hospital ship Peace Ark of the Navy of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. (Xinhua/Zha Chunming)

Li Jianguo, a member of a medical team on a new model of rescue medical helicopter, participates in an exercise in the sea area of Indian Ocean, Sept. 14, 2010. The helicopter made its first debut on Monday after successfully accomplishing the landfall task on the board of hospital ship Peace Ark of the Navy of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. (Xinhua/Zha Chunming)

Liu Bingli (R), head of a medical team on a new model of rescue medical helicopter, participates in an exercise in the sea area of Indian Ocean, Sept. 14, 2010. The helicopter made its first debut on Monday after successfully accomplishing the landfall task on the board of hospital ship Peace Ark of the Navy of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. (Xinhua/Zha Chunming)
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,868
Likes
23,280
Country flag
Okay..first things first... what is PLA ship doing in Indian Ocean? Where is our Navy? Has it gone all limp thanks to the weak and soft central government?
 

nimo_cn

Senior Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2009
Messages
4,032
Likes
883
Country flag
Okay..first things first... what is PLA ship doing in Indian Ocean? Where is our Navy? Has it gone all limp thanks to the weak and soft central government?
I believe those ships are sailing in international waters.
Does that bother you? Why are you so sensitive?
 

ahmedsid

Top Gun
Senior Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
2,960
Likes
252
Okay..first things first... what is PLA ship doing in Indian Ocean? Where is our Navy? Has it gone all limp thanks to the weak and soft central government?
If I may correct you, The Indian Ocean is just a Name, it doesnt belong as a whole to India! :) The Chinese Ships can Sail in International Waters, just like the USN or the French or the Somalian Pirates :)
 
Joined
Feb 16, 2009
Messages
29,939
Likes
48,797
Country flag
Will the Indian Ocean define the 21st century?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/12/AR2010111206504.html

Shashi Tharoor is a member of India's Parliament and the author, most recently, of "The Elephant, the Tiger and the Cell Phone: Reflections on India in the 21st Century."

In 1410, near the Sri Lankan coastal town of Galle, Chinese Admiral Zheng He erected a stone tablet with a message to the world. His inscription was in three languages - Chinese, Persian and Tamil - and his message was even more remarkable. According to Robert Kaplan in his new book, "Monsoon," the admiral "invoked the blessings of the Hindu deities for a peaceful world built on trade."

A Chinese sailor-statesman calling upon Indian gods as he set out to develop commercial links with the Middle East and East Africa: There could be no better illustration of the cosmopolitanism of the Indian Ocean region, centuries before the word "globalization" had even been coined.

Zheng's travels 600 years ago stand as a reminder of the economic potential of the vast Indian Ocean, which washes the shores of dozens of countries, large and small, from South Africa to Singapore. These nations straddle half the globe, account for half of the planet's container traffic and carry two-thirds of its petroleum.

But Kaplan is particularly interested in the ocean's strategic implications. His premise is that the Greater Indian Ocean, from the Horn of Africa to Indonesia, "may comprise a map as iconic to the new century as Europe was to the last one" and "demographically and strategically be a hub of the twenty-first century world." This makes the Indian Ocean "the essential place to contemplate the future of U.S. power." Perhaps that is what President Obama did last week as he flew from India to Indonesia, the vastness of the Indian Ocean beneath.

After laying out his thesis, Kaplan, the author of influential books on the Balkans, the American military and the "coming anarchy" of the post-Cold War world, launches into what he most enjoys - travel. He is a geographic determinist: For him, geography explains history, determines economics and transcends politics. As he ranges across the region from Oman to Sumatra, taking in Zanzibar, Kolkata and Sri Lanka along the way, he gives us a curious and compelling volume, part travelogue, part potted history, part journalism and part strategic analysis. It's a book that convinces the reader that what Kaplan calls Monsoon Asia is a profoundly interesting and complicated part of the world, but the chapters don't add up to a coherent argument as to why the region should matter more to the United States than anywhere else.

Amid fluent if bland prose, Kaplan occasionally startles with a passage of astonishing lyricism ("a sweeping, bone-dry peninsula between long lines of soaring ashen cliffs and a sea the color of rusty tap water") or passionate polemic ("poverty is not exotic, it has no saving graces, it is just awful"). There are powerful descriptions of global warming in Bangladesh, of the intersection of environment, demography and Islam in Indonesia, and of the people of Burma as "victim of the evil confluence of totalitarianism, realpolitik and corporate profits."

The reporter in Kaplan is well in evidence when he visits the Pakistani port of Gwadar or Sri Lanka's Hambantota, both being developed by the Chinese (the former, he thinks, for strategic reasons; the latter for commercial ones). Facts and quotes abound as he recounts the growth of Indian naval aspirations and China's plans to be a two-ocean maritime power: Kaplan tells us that China will soon have more ships than the U.S. Navy and, by 2015, will be the world's most prolific shipbuilder.

Kaplan's breadth of travel and learning leads to intriguing insights, such as his argument that "like the Serbs in the former Yugoslavia and the Shiites in Iran, the Sinhalese [in Sri Lanka] are a demographic majority with a dangerous minority complex of persecution." In his view, Indonesia reveals both a "clash" and a "merger of civilizations." More contentiously, global capitalism as embodied by the Chinese "constitutes the real threat to Indonesian Islam."
ad_icon

These are all worthwhile ideas. But Kaplan too often strains to justify his interests with portentous claims: Sri Lanka is "the ultimate register of geopolitical trends in the Indian Ocean region," Burma "provides a code for understanding the world to come," Indonesia will be "a critical hub of world politics." Shoehorning his travels into the book makes for an uneven effect, with some surprising inclusions and omissions. One can't help feeling that a country has been deemed to be important because he traveled there.

In addition, the geopolitical analysis is sometimes erratic, as Kaplan hedges his bets. India and China could compete on the seas, providing an opening for the United States, or their "mutual dependence on the same sea lanes could also lead to an alliance between them that . . . might be implicitly hostile to the United States." A few pages later, "a global maritime system, loosely led by the Americans, with help from the Indians, and hopefully the Chinese" might evolve. By the end of the book, "leveraging allies must be part of a wider military strategy that seeks to draw in China as part of an Asia-centric alliance system."

Kaplan concludes that Washington, "as the benevolent outside power," must seize this "time of unprecedented opportunity" because "only by seeking at every opportunity to identify its struggles with those of the larger Indian Ocean world can American power finally be preserved."

Struggles? Finally be preserved? This is sketchy stuff at best, as if Kaplan felt the need to burden his reportage with an all-embracing thesis in order to justify putting a number of enjoyable but unconnected essays between hard covers. Memo to Washington policy-makers: "Monsoon" is a book to take on a long flight to the Far East. But it won't substitute for your dossiers when you get there.



Yet if you don't care about getting there, you can have a lot of fun along the way, because Kaplan tells a good story - or rather, a series of good (if not always connected) stories. He converses with mysterious American expat soldiers with noms de guerre such as "Father of the White Monkey" and "the Bull That Swims," busy plotting freelance insurrections in Burma. A Pakistani dissident claims that India is "the role model for South Asia" and calls for open borders, while another denounces his own nation: "Pakistan is itself a breach of contract."
 

SATISH

DFI Technocrat
Ambassador
Joined
Mar 7, 2009
Messages
2,038
Likes
303
Country flag
LF...Indian ocean has defined trade since people started travelling in ships in High seas....
 

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
Nirupama Rao speaks on India's role in the Indian ocean and gives an insight on Foreign Ministry thinking in this area.


http://meaindia.nic.in/mystart.php?id=190016701

November 19, 2010

Admiral Arun Prakash, Chairman NMF
Commodore C Udai Bhaskar, Director NMF
Ladies and Gentleman

It is indeed a privilege for me to speak at the National Maritime Foundation which has made an invaluable contribution to raising maritime awareness and in promoting the concept of 'Maritime India'- a task that Sardar KM Pannikar, India's foremost naval historian, would have warmly applauded. I congratulate Admiral Arun Prakash and his team at the Foundation for their efforts. I thank them for the invitation to speak here today.

2. India and the Indian Ocean are inseparable. In the midst of the third largest ocean in the world, India's location is in many ways her destiny. That is not just a statement regarding a fact of geography but of deeper civilizational, historical, cultural, economic and political linkages that have been forged between India and the Ocean that bears its name. Throughout history, India's wellbeing and prosperity was linked to its access to the Indian Ocean region. It is no coincidence that the decolonization of the littoral countries of the Indian Ocean region was catalyzed by India's independence and emergence as a free nation. The Indian diaspora is a prominent presence in almost all countries of the region. Apart from the Monsoon, the India-link, in its broadest sense, is the single common thread that is visible in the Indian Ocean region.

3. The organic unity of the Indian Ocean was fractured during the colonial period. Now, the winds of globalization are bringing a fresh bond of unity in the Indian Ocean region. Globalization is inseparable from its maritime dimension, as 90 % of global trade by weight and volume is carried by sea. India is a major stakeholder and beneficiary of globalization. As an emerging global economic and trading power, India has thus a vital stake in maritime security. India's global mercantile trade has grown phenomenally and now constitutes 41% of our GDP. 77% of our trade by value, and over 90% by volume is carried by sea. India is now projected to become the fourth largest economy in the world by 2020, after China, Japan and the US. Our dependence on sea borne trade is expected to expand exponentially. The maritime dimension is also vital for our energy security. India's oil consumption is expected to rise to 245 million tons annually by 2020, with the country likely to be the world's single largest importer of oil by 2050. Our economic growth would continue to be critically depended upon the unhindered flow of oil. The Indian Ocean region is important for India in terms of trade and as a source of energy supplies. Trade with the littoral States of the Indian Ocean constitutes close to 40% of India's total trade.

4. The Indian Ocean is virtually a land-locked ocean. It is distinguished by a land rim on three sides; Asia to its north, Africa to its west and SE Asia and Australia to its East. Access to the region is only possible through seven established gateways or choke points. To the East, the Straits of Malacca, Sunda and Lombok connect the South China Sea to the Indian Ocean. The congestion and the narrow width of these straits make them susceptible to possible terrorist attacks. The Malacca Straits are the primary route, through which more than 50,000 vessels transit annually. To the west, the world's busiest shipping lanes pass through the Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. The Malacca Straits handle 40 % of world trade; the Straits of Hormuz handle 40 % of all traded crude oil. It is not hard to imagine the consequences to the global economy if these choke points are indeed choked. The Indian Ocean is also one of the world's most important waterways, with 50% of the container traffic and more than 70% of crude and oil products being carried through it. The disruption of energy flows in particular is a considerable security concern for littoral states, as a majority of their energy lifelines are sea-based. The world thus has a vital stake in the stability of the archipelagic countries. It's not just the use of waterways that is important, but access to them as well. Landlocked countries are now therefore gaining a new geopolitical significance, for transit roads and pipelines.

5. It is a now a widely accepted truism that the geopolitics of the Indian Ocean region is a microcosm of global geopolitical trends. There are countries which are developing rapidly; on the other hand, there are those which are on the brink of collapse. In between there are those which are emerging from conflict and show promise of making rapid strides in the future. There are a large number of democracies in the region but it cannot be said that democracy is a universal norm for the region. A number of countries suffer from weak governance and regime instability, vulnerable to non-state actors driven by extremist ideologies. Threats to stability in the region abound, ranging from terrorism, piracy, war-lordism, proliferation, smuggling and drug trafficking. The situation off the Horn of Africa is a source of particular concern. The situation in land-locked Afghanistan also impacts on the Indian Ocean region, as a substantial portion of the international military presence there is dependent on support from maritime assets and capabilities. The impact of climate change is of concern to several island states that face a threat to their very survival. But, the bright side is that parts of the Indian Ocean littoral are witnessing an unprecedented economic boom, driven by positive economic and demographic factors. The overall picture is therefore mixed and complicated, not lending itself to easy categorization or solutions. What is certain is that India stands out both in what it has achieved and the untapped potential that still lies ahead. In short, the future of the Indian Ocean region is unthinkable without India.

6. By any objective criteria, India has very significant maritime stakes in the Indian Ocean. We have a coast line of over 7500 kms. Between the Lashwadeep and the Andaman and Nicobar chains we have over 600 islands, with the southernmost tip just 90 nautical miles from Indonesia and the northern most tip less than 10 nautical miles from Myanmar. In terms of maritime security terms these are significant assets. Our EEZ is more than 2.5 million square KMs. The mining areas of over 150,000 sq KMs allotted to India under UNCLOS are about 2000 kms from our southernmost tip. We have significant interests in Antarctica as well. For several decades, India was the only Asian country to possess an aircraft carrier. Our naval force posture in the coming years will require the necessary capabilities in terms of reach, sustaining power and sea control. Following the sea-borne terrorist attacks on 26/11 in Mumbai, concerted efforts have been undertaken for strengthening maritime and coastal security against threats from sea, with greater involvement of the Navy, the Coast Guard and all the coastal states.

7. As India's development is predicated on a stable geo-strategic environment, as a mature and responsible nation, it is in our interest that we play an active role in the architecture of maritime security based on the twin principles of shared security and shared prosperity. India is well poised to play a leadership role in this regard. We have friendly and productive bilateral relations with almost all the states in the Indian Ocean region. Our bilateral relations with Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Mauritius, Maldives, Seychelles, Oman, Madagascar, Kenya and others give us unprecedented access to a wide swathe of the Indian Ocean. Some of these are territorial neighbours but all are maritime neighbours. We have historical and civilisational ties with many of these countries. Some of these countries have large Indian communities. The broad spectrum of our ties with these countries has a strong economic and socio-cultural dimension. Maritime security thus gives us a new perspective to our bilateral relations with these countries. We are actively engaged with almost all regional bodies that are either based in or border the Indian Ocean region- ranging from SAARC, BIMSTEC, ARF, ASEAN, GCC, SADC to the AU. We are interested in building a web of cooperative relations that brings together all the stakeholders based on mutual interest and benefit. Our 'soft power' gives us advantages that few other countries can match in this region. There is almost universal acceptance of India's credentials and recognition of the vital contribution that we can make for stability and prosperity of the entire region.

Our economic growth acts as a driver for growth across the entire region. Our bilateral and multilateral assistance programmes are crucial for the security and development requirements of a number of countries. Drawing on its human resources and scientific expertise, India has been assisting traditionally in areas such as agriculture, health, education and IT, as also in capacity building in areas such as hydrography, oceanography, dealing with climate change, etc. It is true that optimizing our economic and technical assistance programmes, even while integrating them with our larger security and strategic interests would yield even greater benefits. This will require leveraging India's soft power and technological strengths as also ensuring greater synergy amongst the various instruments that we can deploy - diplomacy, trade and economic factors and military assistance.

8. We are proud of the fact that our Navy has emerged as a versatile and flexible diplomatic instrument to mark India's presence in the region. The Ministry of External Affairs and the Navy have partnered together as maritime diplomats. There is hardly a port in the region where our ships are not welcome. We have the distinction of undertaking naval exercises in the Indian Ocean with all the major navies of the world. The prompt assistance provided by the Navy in the aftermath of the Indian Ocean Tsunami was an eye-opener with regard to our capabilities for providing timely disaster relief and humanitarian assistance. The Navy did a commendable job in helping in the evacuation of over 2280 people from strife torn Lebanon under Operation Sukoon. The Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS) initiative, launched by Indian Navy has provided a forward looking framework for constructive engagement among the navies of the region. This initiative has tremendous potential as an inclusive forum for all stakeholders, which have legitimate interests in the region. Under the ARF, India has contributed to discussions on maritime security. India has also contributed to regional efforts for safe navigation in the Malacca straits.

9. While India is seen as a net security provider, we cannot carry the burden of regional security on our shoulders alone. There is no doubt that maintaining a favourable maritime balance will require development of a credible naval presence with adequate assets commensurate with our defence and security interests as well as those required to discharge the role and responsibility expected of India by the international community. The era of gun boat diplomacy is long over. A robust Indian naval presence is seen as a necessary contribution to a cooperative regional security order. The cooperative burden sharing of naval forces to fight piracy off the coast of Somalia is a case in point. Our navy has discharged its responsibilities with distinction and is viewed as an indispensible partner not just by regional states but by the UN, EU and NATO naval forces. India is engaged with other countries on capacity-building and consultations in the area of anti-piracy to devise measures for keeping open access points to avoid choking international trade. While we are addressing the immediate threats to maritime security, the international community must find ways of dealing with the failed or failing states where violence and institutional fragility are being exploited by non-State actors and others which have a presence of international terrorist groups on the Indian Ocean littoral which in fact radiate instability in the region as a whole. The recent global financial and economic crisis has aggravated the fragility of many littoral States, some of which are among LDCs.

10. While addressing the threats posed by non-state actors is important, we would also require states themselves to abide by "rules of the road." Maintaining free access to the sea is very much part of defending the 'Global Commons'. This will require a common vision of maritime security and freedom of navigation in accordance with universally agreed principles of international law and peaceful settlement of maritime territorial disputes. The maritime balance in the Indian Ocean region is linked to developments in South East Asia, the Pacific Rim and the Mediterranean. It is unrealistic to presume that we would be able to insulate our region from instability elsewhere. Maritime Security cannot be sustained if there is an exclusive focus on the military dimension alone, for it has economic, political and social dimensions as well. It is also unrealistic to expect that any single power can presume for itself the role of a "sea-based balancer". Lastly, cooperation on maritime security issues could provide the necessary trust and confidence to build a flexible and adaptable Pan Asian Security Order.

11. A popular theme in the media is to project the Indian Ocean as the new theatre of big power conflict. A widely read analyst who has also published a book on the Indian Ocean recently spoke of India being a "global pivot state supreme", in the so-called tussle between the United States and China. While this description is flattering, we do not make policy on the basis of 'feel- good labels'. There is no inevitability of conflict. India views the emerging trends with realism-building a sustainable regional security will require a cooperative effort among all regional countries on the one hand and all users of the Indian Ocean. As the main resident power in the Indian Ocean region, we have a vital stake in the evolution of a stable, open, inclusive and balanced security and cooperation architecture in the region. By definition this would need to be a consensus based process, where all the stakeholders who have a legitimate presence in the region make their respective contributions to regional security. India stands for harnessing the forces of geo-politics for new forms of cooperation rather than it being used as an excuse for domination by any single country. That is the vision that we aspire to. And that is the vision we look forward to realizing our partnership with all countries of the Indian Ocean region.

12. Before I conclude, let me briefly speak about the Indian Ocean Rim – Association for Regional Cooperation (IOR-ARC) that came into existence in 1997. India was one of the 14 founding member States. Given the growing strategic significance of the Indian Ocean, this organisation is the only one which aims to create a web of cooperative relationships between the now 18 member countries spanning three continents and three water bodies: this provides the right balance in terms of developing the littoral countries, across the political and geo-political spectrum, in a direction where economic, trade, academic and cultural cooperation constitutes the core of these relationships. The political and the strategic subtext of this organisation's activities is very relevant in the current times. Although the organization has not been able to fulfil its stated potential as yet, it does provide us with a useful platform to articulate our inclusive non-polarising vision of the future of the Indian Ocean and its littoral.

13. Let me conclude by commending the Maritime Foundation for their valuable contribution to the national discourse on maritime issues.

Thank you.
 

neo29

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
1,284
Likes
30
Countering Chinese "String of Pearls" through naval diplomacy

Abbreviations: IN – Indian Navy, SSBN – Ballistic Missile Nuclear Submarine

"String of Pearls" is the term used with reference to the Chinese construction of ports and facilities across the Indian Ocean region. As one Chinese Admiral remarked, "Indian ocean is not India's ocean", China has been making belligerent moves to foray into the Indian Ocean – long considered India's backyard and its exclusive domain. Indian naval and diplomatic overtures have gone on an overdrive to counter the aggressive moves.

http://www.digitalgupshup.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Indian-navy-jobs.jpg

In recent times China with its growing wealth has or is in the process of constructing ports, listening posts and pipelines in various Indian Ocean littorals – a proposed rail link, via Myanmar to Chittagong port in Bangladesh, Construction of Sona deep sea port at Cox Bazaar in Bangladesh, Construction of Hambantola port in Sri Lanka and a full facility at Gawadar port, west of Karachi, in Pakistan. It also attempted to gain access to Seychelles but the attempts were

thwarted by India. Recently, it has opened an underground SSBN base on Hainan Island in the South China Sea and indications are that the new Jin-class SSBN's will be deployed here. These facilities span across the Indian Ocean effectively encircling India. The Chinese move is not entirely India centric though it is part of a larger India containment strategy. It's a long term multi-purpose strategy. The major driving force behind this is to ensure sustained oil supplies and secure the strategic shipping lanes through which majority of its oil and trade transit. Hence, the sea lanes stretching from Gulf of Aden to Strait of Malacca are the backbone for sustaining the export driven Chinese economic behemoth and such excessive dependence makes it a liability and makes the economy and the country vulnerable. These facilities offer berthing rights, repair and refueling facilities to Chinese naval assets and help mitigate the adverse effects to some extent and the pipelines bypass the sea lanes wherever possible and feasible.

On the strategic side, Malacca strait is a choke point to restrict the Chinese to the South China Sea and the countries in the region have 'not so cordial' relations and China has territorial disputes with all of them and of late China has taken very aggressive posture with all its neighbors and has resorted to bullying as is evident in the recent incidents. In the trawler incident with Japan it blocked the supply of rare earth metals to bring Japan to its knees and in the incident of South Korean warship sunk by North Korean torpedo, it blocked a resolution reprimanding the North, in the United Nations.

It has no friends in the region and those that toe its line are those nations run by dictators be it Myanmar, North Korea or for that matter Pakistan. In this context, in the event of a conflict with India or with the US over Taiwan, India and US can impose a naval blockade and cut off the crucial oil supplies denting a blow to the Chinese military machine. All these instances have sent alarm bells ringing in the Indian Strategic community and India and the Indian Navy have been taking steps from some time and the things are slowly falling in place in maintaining Indian dominance in the Indian Ocean region. Let's examine some of the prominent measures taken in this direction.

Firstly, Indian Navy's modernization program is very well on track and has acquired lot of assets in line with its ambition of being a true blue water force. It is ramping up its aviation arm with the induction of Mig-29's and is developing new bases along the coast under project Seabird at karwar and an exclusive submarine base near Visakhapatnam.

IN's capabilities have been recognized and acknowledged time and again. For instance, in December 2004 when Tsunami struck, IN was the first to respond and deployed its vessels for relief operations and has received much praise for it.

It has also been escorting US and coalition vessels on their request in the war on terror. Indian fleet of over 130 ships with its stealth frigates and destroyers is a potent force and its surface fleet is definitely ahead of the Chinese. The rapid expansion of the Chinese submarine fleet is a concern though and India has to take urgent steps to address its depleting submarine levels. Countering the Chinese needs a multilateral approach and India has been making the right moves of late.

Indian diplomacy, particularly naval diplomacy, has been reaching out to the countries in the Indian Ocean. Indian navy has off late embarked on a series of exercises and forged partnerships with countries across Indian and Pacific oceans. The Indian Navy started the Indian Ocean Naval Symposium to provide the Indian Ocean littorals a forum to come together to cooperate on the security aspects in the region.

This has been institutionalized now with regular interactions. Indian Navy has a very strong and sophisticated hydrographic arm which has played a silent role in helping various states map their coastlines and will soon assist Saudi Arabia. China views this as a guise by the Indian Navy to get access to ports and naval bases.

IN has also generously gifted offshore patrol vessels to Maldives and Seychelles in their quest to establish their maritime forces and has also been patrolling their coastline and exclusive economic zones (EEZ). They are also being integrated into Indian coastal defense network which helps India keep a track of movements on their side. Reports indicate that Maldives will lease two islands to India for development and to establish observation posts.

IN has also strengthened its presence in Africa. It has established a listening post in Madagascar and has acquired berthing rights in Oman. It was requested to provide sea cover to the African summit, recognition of its strength and role. The IN's anti-piracy patrolling and operations in the Gulf of Aden has been very successful and many African countries are now looking forward to India to play a greater role.

IN is being extensively used by the government as a toll in diplomacy. It has conducted exercises with many countries which have grown in size and complexity over time and IN ships have gone on port calls quite frequently from Asia, Middle East to Africa. It has exercised with major countries in the region US, UK, France, Japan and Singapore.

The MALABAR series of exercises with the US have grown in complexity exponentially and Japan and Singapore also joined in one edition which prompted China to issue a demarche to know the intention of the exercise. It signed an agreement in 2008 with Japanese coast guard for joint patrolling in the Asia-Pacific region.

The countries adjoining Malacca strait Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have been reluctant at outside intervention in policing the channel but have agreed to Indian help in this regard. Recently, Indian Prime Minister has toured Japan and Vietnam as part of the "Look East policy" and has also engaged Indonesia.

It has signed strategic partnerships with them and is expanding the defense cooperation with them which has raised eyebrows in China. India has agreed to supply those spares for their Russian origin weaponry and also train their soldiers in its military establishments. All these moves are in the right direction and will fructify in the long term.

India and China are not going to war anytime soon and China definitely doesn't intend to fight India in its own backyard and the moves are more of pressure tactics and broader agenda of a long-term containment. So, India should be consistent in its efforts and move ahead with combined approach of naval acquisitions and partnering with other like-minded countries in the region.

http://idrw.org/?p=2081
 

Tshering22

Sikkimese Saber
Senior Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
7,868
Likes
23,280
Country flag
Navy has played a vital role indeed in increasing our ties with various IOR countries particularly Maldives, Singapore and Seychelles. However, Navy's fund level must be expanded in proportion compared to the Army since the IA gets lions share and still spends it all in corruption and bureaucracy. Navy is at least making a strong pitch for a powerful fleet. The only worry is submarine fleet which is dwindling fast and no replacement is visible. Scorpenes are getting delayed, indigenous submarine making is nowhere in sight.

But a naval confrontation with Chinese is almost impossible since they would prefer striking from land and air which is closer and doesn't involve in traveling have the Asia-Pacific for a fight. While that admiral might have issued statements to play mind games considering that they keep everything so secretive, even the entire PLAN elite knows what it would mean to confront IN in IOR. They would simply be sitting ducks waiting to be toasted. It is as much difficult for PLAN to gain any advantage in IOR as it is for IN to gain advantage in South China Sea. Not going to happen.

As for the ports that Chinese are building in Bangladesh, SL and Pakistan cannot be used for wartime scenario since:

- To reach SL or Pakistan, they have to cross BoB which is a strong point of IN
- Myanmar would also play neutral here as a non-involved party since there is greater engagement for them now with us
- In a wartime if any of these ports agree to support anti-Indian action, they will also be targeted by IAF and IN; something which none of these small countries would want to come across.

So Navy in current scenario must adopt military diplomacy as its primary role while being ready for a war as secondary while IAF and IA must do the opposite.
 

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
Expanding India's role in the Indian Ocean Region - IOR-ARC

The Indian Ocean region is all set to be what the Atlantic Ocean was in the 20th century. A major hub of international trade and commerce as well as a region of great power conflict. Many experts have mentioned this and many of India's regional concern tie in together when the entire Indian Ocean picture comes into play.

Here is a brief reivew of Robert Kaplan who is the most recent to have a written a book on this aspect.

Robert Kaplan Pegs Indian Ocean Rim As Global Hub
Foreign policymakers distracted by recent history—the fallout from the end of the Cold War, the morasses of Iraq and Afghanistan—should shift their gazes from northern landmasses to southern seas. That's the thrust of Robert Kaplan's new book, Monsoon: The Indian Ocean and the Future of American Power, which argues that the Indian Ocean "will demographically and strategically be a hub of the 21st-century world."

Kaplan, who has written prolifically on how geography plays into national destiny, takes the "rise of the rest" theory one step further in Monsoon. It's not just the BRICs that are worth watching, he says, but the whole ocean and its rimland, from Indonesia to the Horn of Africa, which is lined with billions of people in dozens of countries. The area already accounts for 70 percent of the world's traffic of petroleum products, and it will be the setting for the new Great Game between China, India, and the U.S., as each country vies for naval dominance of its waters. Forget Europe and Russia; it is the Indian Ocean's rim, says Kaplan, that will be the epicenter of the next generation of global issues, including climate change, access to energy, and extremist politics.

On its far West lies Somalia, the anarchic state responsible for piracy on Indian Ocean shipping lanes; on the far East, Indonesia, whose democracy "could become the lodestar of the Muslim world" and whose nearby Strait of Malacca "hosts" 50 percent of the world's merchant fleet capability. As America's influence slowly shrinks worldwide, the U.S. will have to engage these rim countries in order to legitimize its power in the region.

Engaging with this new hub also means being realistic about China's rise. Kaplan takes a skeptical view of America's "hyperventilat[ion] over China," he said in a recent interview with NEWSWEEK. China will build a strong Navy, he writes, "not only of hard but of soft power as well: to help protect the global commons and a trading system for the benefit of all." Despite all the ink spilled over China's growing aggressiveness, he sees the Chinese Navy as rising "in a legitimate matter, to protect economic and rightful security interests as America's has done, rather than to forge a potentially suicidal insurgency force at sea, as Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy appears bent on doing in the Persian Gulf."

Kaplan compares China's rise with that of the U.S. in the years between the Civil War and World War I. "Our economy started growing every year as dynamically as China's does now, and as a consequence we started to trade with the world in the same way China does now," he says. Symbolically, China's absorption of Taiwan would be equivalent to America's final pacification of the Native Americans, in that it would be the moment when China no longer needs to focus on its own territorial concerns and begins looking outward in earnest.

In this emerging region, New Delhi will compete with Beijing for influence. China has built bunkering facilities in Sri Lanka, ports in Pakistan, and roads in Burma; all projects extend China's reach into India's sphere of influence, safeguard its investments, and assist it in transporting resources back into the mainland. For its part, India is also rapidly expanding its Navy. "India's rise in and of itself, even if it remains equidistant from the U.S. and China, benefits the U.S., because it acts as a counterweight even if it doesn't lean towards the U.S.," says Kaplan. Yet despite Delhi's relationship with Washington, "one cannot caution enough how subtly this game will have to be played, for India will never officially join the United States in any anti-Chinese alliance the way Japan joined the United States in an anti-Soviet one during the Cold War," Kaplan writes. Currently, the seaboard of the Indian Ocean lacks a superpower, which makes it, says Kaplan, a very "future trending" place indeed.
 
Last edited:

ejazr

Ambassador
Joined
Oct 8, 2009
Messages
4,523
Likes
1,388
The most prominent institution that seems to be overlooking security and commerce in the Indian Ocean Region is the Indian Ocean Rim Association for Regional Cooperation

From wikipedia. The full members in this grouping are
Australia Bangladesh India Indonesia Iran Kenya Madagascar Malaysia Mauritius Mozambique Oman Singapore South Africa Sri Lanka Tanzania Thailand United Arab Emirates Yemen

Dialouge partners are: China, Japan, France, UK, Egypt

 

Latest Replies

Global Defence

New threads

Articles

Top