- Joined
- May 5, 2011
- Messages
- 12,846
- Likes
- 8,556
No. If you only read the previous posts you would have known that I agree that the failure to notify the Indian side of the arrest is a violation of the VCCR and more importantly, I agree that a special arrangement should have been made on her arrest just to give importance to the special relationship between Indian and the US (but I don't agree that the arrest per se was illegal).This is the usual argument you put forward. That GOI should be blamed for everything.
What I'm arguing at length however is the legality of the case against her and the arrest. I'm also pointing out that the outrage in this case is a product of a huge misunderstanding brought about by the callous playing with public sensitivities about affronts to Indian pride. Hey this is election time in India? Which is irresponsible and dangerous.
I'm of the opinion that a lot of Indians are easily offended and that's not very mature. But I also pointed out in my earlier posts that I noticed that there are more Indians agreeing with the case against Khobragade.And from these replies it is evident how you think of Indians. You clearly are of the opinion consciously or sub-consciously that Indians don't have enough IQ to understand the happenings of the world and couldn't differentiate the propaganda of the govt if they have misled us. Ofcourse you can present the argument how wrong I was thinking but that doesn't change the fact how you look at us from the arguments you make.
I don't think the Indian public were sufficiently notified by GOI of the previous maid issues of your consuls in New York. It is clear from the comments of a lot of you that you have never thought long and hard about the previous incidents. Otherwise, you would not feel too surprised and taken aback now with the case against Khobragade.Let me repeat it once again for you. Since you are already familiar that this is not the first case against Indian diplomats, you should try to understand why there is a huge discontent among Indian public only over this incident and not the previous ones.
She was strip searched but not "cavity searched." I agree with you that she should not have been subjected to being strip searched.The whole outrage of the indian public is because she is strip and cavity searched. You have carefully neglected this aspect despite being repeatedly shown the direction.