panduranghari
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
- Messages
- 1,786
- Likes
- 1,245
I am still waiting....or you wish to retract your assertion.Because it is what it is. Maratha's saw non-marathi's with disdain.
I am still waiting....or you wish to retract your assertion.Because it is what it is. Maratha's saw non-marathi's with disdain.
Actually thats wrong. The battle was not lost. Abdali decided to withdraw and a stalemate was called.In 1761, the Maratha army lost the Third Battle of Panipat which halted imperial expansion.
Tell a Bangladeshi that they were low caste who converted.Why did all the dalits and Tribals of East Bengal converted to Muslims?give me an answer.Thanks to Brahmin idiocy and incompetency it formed into Bangladesh
Because they were more powerful.If populations were converted 'by the sword' why did it take so many centuries for the countries of the Middle East and North Africa (which were conquered early on by the Arabs) to have a majority Muslim population? You have not answered this.
To a true believer the Quaran and Hadith are very relevant.The Quran and Hadith are irrelevant in this regard.
Makes you really wonder when Uk would pay for its crimes.Aside from paying reparations for WW2 destructions and crimes, post-War Germany still had to pay its WW1 reparations which it did until the 1990s.
Try the International Court of Justice...Makes you really wonder when Uk would pay for its crimes.
For a shameless country like UK auch things are fruitless.Try the International Court of Justice...
It's all about influence. India has a much bigger econony now tha UK and if used right India can elbow UK, if you know what I mean.For a shameless country like UK auch things are fruitless.
They won't accept their crimes in the first place so how can we make them pay for it.
India not interested in money /aid /anything.It's all about influence. India has a much bigger econony now tha UK and if used right India can elbow UK, if you know what I mean.
But why live in the past? India is ahead now. And whether you like it or not without England I doubt there would be a unified India.
UK particularly have lots of mirpuri aka Pakistani Punjabi speaking POK people which propagate thing's against india and use UK as ground to spread their anti india agenda.India not interested in money /aid /anything.
India wants positive relationship with countries but UK try to meddle into our internal affairs that's the issue if they will keep doing that we will keep our relationship focused towards economic factors only not in strategic area.
Tho a official apology for jailwan wala bagh cold blooded massacre will be nice.
As for united india and all you need to remember india is not united because of UK Or xyz country its because of it's people which are living together we have a propagating neighborhood who is still trying to spread insurgency in india but still they are minuscule.
When india got independence there were hundreds of princely states they joined republic of india with will and people from non of the states expect kashmir opposed that.
Uk even didn't wanted a united india.
The politics, military tactics & geography behind how Pakistan won Gilgit-Baltistan from India
The original Himalayan blunder was committed as much by the Kashmir forces as by the Indian Army and India’s political leadership.www.google.com
Uk has been actively funding terror organizationw in India from a long time.UK particularly have lots of mirpuri aka Pakistani Punjabi speaking POK people which propagate thing's against india and use UK as ground to spread their anti india agenda.
They force government their to pass bill on indian territory and opposition parties to use anti india to gain votes this the basic issue for now.
Pakistani influence on UK is the reason why relationship stays mediocre at best.
Things may change, but slowly. The Bristish government has accepted liability for crimes committed during the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya. It is a first step.Makes you really wonder when Uk would pay for its crimes.
But then again the Germans accepted the evil crimes they had commited and their history teaches them about it unlike the Brits who are too shameless to accept their fault.