- Joined
- Oct 4, 2016
- Messages
- 4,836
- Likes
- 10,863
Agree with most of what you said, but i wonder which of those our strategic planners will attempt, since those will involve long, painful and expensive occupation of a viciously hostile defeated territory and humiliated porkis. We are not USA, who could afford to occupy Afghanistan and Iraq endlessly and 'introduce' democray and tamper with native ways of life.
Our strategic thinkers should aim at quick concrete permanent gains and an early exit, ensuring what is left behind will never be a threat to our existence and territorial integrity.
Someone called me silly to have opened this thead, but iam interested to learn what quick steps can be taken post-war to ensure India can coexist with a less harmful (not exactly harmless) porkistan. Bombing their mosques or killing porki civilians or trying to force convert them to other religions, as i see some people commenting here, are counter-productive, and mere rhetoric.
Please contribute well thought out concrete actionables, based on our own strengths and weaknesses ( divided politicians, weaker economy post-war and possible international sanctions during our necessary occupation of porkis).
A defeated Muslim nation cannot be occupied by non muslims, simple. Cleansing the country ethnically would definitely work but isolate India completely in the world and probably invite retaliation.what do we do disagree on out of curiosity ?
even amerikan couldn't afford to occupy afghan or Iraq. Pakistan is a much much larger country and more modernised armed forces. they have fourth generation tech at the least. that's why it's so imprtant to stop non indian media and to install moderate leaders after executing the current leaders especially in their military and madras system. we need to cultivate pro secular and pro peace leaders
truthfully your best option is using intelligence agencies to ferment dissent and break pakiland inside out because it's our best option to avoid nuclear war which India would win but at a huge loss of lives and a huge loss in industry/economy. it would set our community back at least 5 decadəs which would not be acceptable unless pakisalafis were the first to use nukes.
India needs to develop modern MiRV tech and better icbms since pakiland lacks strategiç and geographic depth. even if paks nuke first it would give india a huge cutting edge to come out "better off"
foreign involvement will be
direct involvement will be Saudis/uae who invested Tens of billions in pakiland to make them their slaves. they will use diplomatic, economic pressure to support pakiland and need be use Arab militaries to protect their investment
turks; who see pakis as loyal cultural cousins they need to protect and will send direct military aid
amerika/ukkk/euros - they do NOT want a decisive indian victory. .they want. stalemate which will keep south Asia weak and a playground and an exploitable entity. strong enough to be a force to keep China checkmate but not strong enough to control the IOR or even it's domestic issues.
the best thing for India to do is to work on is development..if India is relevant in the global economy is India will gain the edge diplomatically and ensure supply lines and control the narrative.
Best solution is a short war in which as much land as possible is grabbed and the local population displaced through hook or crook back into neighboring Pakistan. Balochistan can be broken up into an independent country and the rest of Pakistan's army can be disbanded making it a protectorate of India. Their military hardware is completely destroyed leaving just enough to deal with internal threats without being a threat to India. Borders need to be redrawn in Kashmir sector so that infiltration is as made very difficult because of the terrain. Local Kashmiri Muslim population is relocated into Pakistan as there is no place for a Muslim majority state in modern India.