You and your eyewitness accounts prove absolutely nothing. If you want to play the eye witnesses game then you might as well except that an F-16 was shot down or is it only fair one way? While you’re at it every eye witnesses account of aliens and Bigfoot must be true too. I am one of the few people on this forum that have the stance that there is not enough proof of an F-16 shoot down and the eye witnesses accounts of an F-16 mean nothing to me.
Again I have established that eyewitnesses are not reliably. I don’t need to understand the language since you described the sighting as a “burning aircraft” which was most likely an aircraft using
afterburners and flares. Its obviously normal procedures to use flares and afterburners when your aircraft is engaged with missiles.
Like I said if Pakistan actually downed an SU-30 they would share the proof and even in some parallel universe where they chose not to, we would still have the wreckage. There is no way India can hid the wreckage of a 72 foot long, 20 ton aircraft with an additional 20,000lbs fuel in a day of smart phones on a clear sunny morning. You are giving the Indians too much credit, they did a lot of things wrong on the 27th but then became uber masters of secretly hauling away burning wreckage.
As for your other angry rant. It’s a fact Pakistan makes up fake shoot-downs. They tried claiming they shot down 2 Mig-23s over Afghanistan in the 1980s, one pilot was boasting he could have shot 7 Migs that day if he wanted. In reality zero Migs were downed and that Mig-23 bort number 55 later was photographed with slight shrapnel but it landed perfectly fine when the other Mig-23 engaged the failed F-16 ambush. One of many embarrassing Pakistani mafia style lies. We can’t forget the famous 5 aircraft in 30 seconds with a canon but no gun footage
