MrPresident
Regular Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2016
- Messages
- 444
- Likes
- 1,002
Lie?? Check post 520....I've been already and I never saw no debunking m8.
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
Lie?? Check post 520....I've been already and I never saw no debunking m8.
Not a lie, just didn't bother to check that far back, a stupid (and may I say lazy) mistake on my part which I accept.Lie?? Check post 520....
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk
See the difference in the amount of damage in the two seekers, the one on the right is nearly intact, if you look at the video which displayed the Bison wreckage in HD, you will only find one seeker on the ground intact, which is the right one, bit the left seeker was nowhere to be seen on the video.Well, that's not outside the realm of possibility, could also be due to impact upon crash.In any case, we've all seen the video of two chutes opening up at some distance apart, so it's quite likely that PAF lost one of their air craft.
The real question is where are the two seekers on the unfired R-77s?Even if that were to be true,where did they manage to obtain the second IIR seeker from if Abhi had in fact managed to fire off one R73 as has been claimed??
R-77's do not have IR seekers, if I am not wrong??The real question is where are the two seekers on the unfired R-77s?
Did I say IR seekers? Read it again....R-77's do not have IR seekers, if I am not wrong??
I think what he meant to say was that the Pakis couldn't have swapped out its seeker to mix and match with the body of an R73 since the former doesn't come with an IIR seeker.Did I say IR seekers? Read it again....
There is enough debris not there to fill an entire missile. Don't trust the Paki who mix and match things. If it is two IR seekers there then where are the R-77 seekers?I think what he meant to say was that the Pakis couldn't have swapped out its seeker to mix and match with the body of an R73 since the former doesn't come with an IIR seeker.
already explained this in my tweets, plus something also is wrong here.
All four of the AAMs carried by Abhi's Mig 21 Bison appears to be accounted for, which would imply that he couldn't have fired one at the PAF F 16, supposedly downed by him.How you folks gonna explain this??
Yeah, just saw them here https://defenceforumindia.com/forum/threads/iaf-mig-21-shoots-down-pakistani-f-16.81461/page-26already explained this in my tweets, plus something also is wrong here.
dirty tricks departments at work.
Clearly they've managed to find the jettisoned seeker of the R73 that had struck the PAF jet, took them some time though, should've found it earlier considering they knew the general area where to look for it.There is enough debris not there to fill an entire missile. Don't trust the Paki who mix and match things. If it is two IR seekers there then where are the R-77 seekers?
This image is itself enough to explain.
All four of the AAMs carried by Abhi's Mig 21 Bison appears to be accounted for, which would imply that he couldn't have fired one at the PAF F 16, supposedly downed by him.How you folks gonna explain this??
Dude, relax, I got it figured out already, but thanks anyway.This image is itself enough to explain.
For your information, R73 has warhead in its mid body, not top (which encloses seeker). As soon as R73 reached F-16, proximity sensor detonated it while top cone came down.
Clearly in the image, mid body of one missile is blown up.
This video says that "No country in the world allows foreigners to count their military assets". But, that's not true. US requires its military hardware be subject to inspections.
Must watch! Expose on pakis!
U.S. export laws authorize the transfer of defense articles and services through FMS only if the receiving nation agrees to the following conditions:
• The defense articles and services must be used only for the purposes for which they were provided.
• The defense articles and services must not be transferred to a third nation or party without the knowledge and consent of the United States.
• The defense articles and services must receive the same degree of protection and physical security that the United States would provide the items.
https://www.army.mil/article/192447..._the_key_to_success_in_foreign_military_sales• The nation must, upon official request, permit the United States to observe and verify compliance with the transfer agreements that the nation has signed.