no smoking
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2009
- Messages
- 5,022
- Likes
- 2,323
Comparing to what you did for Tibetans, no we are doing nothing!Are you guys not already doing that? Supporting the insurgents groups and separatists in India.
Comparing to what you did for Tibetans, no we are doing nothing!Are you guys not already doing that? Supporting the insurgents groups and separatists in India.
common dont lie to us .... whole world know you guyz are directly/indirectly helping the insurgents and separatists .... when it compared to Tibet ... we did minimal (if we ever did one)Comparing to what you did for Tibetans, no we are doing nothing!
@lion .. I like this Idea ... we should do it asap ...we can destabilize china by creating democracy fire there
Well, you will not want to know that.Check this comparison Table India vs China vs Pakistan
this purely explains that we are faar behind to china in numbers ... dont know the accountability of the technology ...
u r allready doing it the ulfa the ne rebels what u do moreIf India tries to take advantage of Tibet/Xinjiang, what do you think would stop China from helping those insurgents groups and separatists in India?
I don't know, I am living in Australia.
Regarding Pakistan case, it is not "IF", China is taking advantage of Pakistan against India.
Like I said that at this moment there are circumstances and conditions that provides Pakistan to support PRC the way they are doing at this moment. One of these conditions is that Pakistan obeys what the PRC says to them. Would that change. Pakistan has a tendency to ask what [x] has done for them and exponentially promote what they themselves have done for the [x].Don't worry about Sino-Pakistan relationship, as long as India is here and strong than Pakistan, we are good.
Yes. If those separatists are from Pakistan. When Pakistan appreciates like you have said at the forefront that PRC is taking advantage of Pakistan against India what will they do. Its a perpetual Pakistan demand that they will need to be pleased. When they are not (once) they will do whats in their nature and that is to show PRC their displeasure. Think about that.It is true that there are substantial political and social instability in China, but India is also facing the same problem, even worse! With only around 60% of Hindus within India population, do you think india would be in a better position to handle separatists?
In a big room there is plenty of space. There are also many people who are drinking. Some with big glasses. Some with small glass but thinking to upgrade to a bigger glass for the next refill. Also if one wants to drink too much and too fast others will not always follow. Each has its own drinking habits. Some last longer compared to others. Some know when to refill and stop. The best drinkers are the the ones that have consistency.You still don't get it, as the 2 countries which intends to become superpower, neither of them has interest in sharing a drink with another one.
1. You may just compare the 3 gen. Fighter jets's numbers and ages.Well CCTV,
We want to know that but what u don't know is china's fighter jet's aging fleet,
therefore china has signed an agreement with russia for 100 su-35's(if m not mistaken)...
china is afraid of india's 126 fighter jet deal..
And don't be in any illusion that u can defeat india this time. this is not 1962. this 2013. if ur country try to do anything wrong, then that is gng to be very very wrong for her...
And one thing more, MIND IT!
As far as i remember we did not give Tenzin an AK 47 and told him to go and have fun on the Tibetan plateauComparing to what you did for Tibetans, no we are doing nothing!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tibetan_Resistance_Since_1950#1959_Tibetan_uprisingAs far as i remember we did not give Tenzin an AK 47 and told him to go and have fun on the Tibetan plateau
1.quality do matter.that too in current environment1. You may just compare the 3 gen. Fighter jets's numbers and ages.
2.china did not sign a agreement to buy any su35 yet, but a agreement of May be buy 24 of su35.
3.how did you know China is afraid of India 's fighter jet deal? And the deal is highly uncertain ....
4. India and China 's gap at today is much wider than in 1962. ( India is still unable to produce canons, shells , bullets, riffles, tanks, fighter jets, submarines,nuclear warhead for missiles....... ,but China can produce everything.)
5. Base on the above, how can India do if China try to do something " wrong".
chinese navy is new ships on old soviet tech..not much of threat.Dear ramakrishna and comparison,
You both are right, but it is true that in a face to face wrestle, there are possibilities that china may outnumbered us..
we are a no match for china but china's maximum air force use old fighter jet's, new one's are not reliable like j-10. j-20 is under research...
main emphasis is on navy..
china's navy is very modern and the reason is they are modernizing by taking into consideration America...
if they prepare to compete with no 1 they will defiantly easily tackle follow no's.....
comparison, your point is right. by using raw/ib, we can destabilize china by creating democracy fire there. we can support tibet, tiwan, and various other internal matters like one usa has done with ussr...
@CCTV1.quality do matter.that too in current environment
2.western news reports are contradictory to your view
3.china is apprehensive of costly western equipment and capabilities on which it cant lay its hands ,not afraid
4.true a gap that need to be bridged quickly.and govt's are taking necessary steps.
5.china's offensive capabilities vis a vis india are limited
1. Did I said not? What is you point here?1.quality do matter.that too in current environment
2.western news reports are contradictory to your view
3.china is apprehensive of costly western equipment and capabilities on which it cant lay its hands ,not afraid
4.true a gap that need to be bridged quickly.and govt's are taking necessary steps.
5.china's offensive capabilities vis a vis india are limited
Well, to proof you are not trolling . Can you provide a example here?chinese navy is new ships on old soviet tech..not much of threat.
kilo class,ming which forms bulk are soviet tech.Well, to proof you are not trolling . Can you provide a example here?
1.india have edge here.1. Did I said not? What is you point here?
2.western news ..... Good luck
3. How? You had all western equipment at 1962.
4.quickly? 10 ,20 or 50 years? This year is the 51th year from 1962 already. How many more years you need?
5. Well, if a country need to import bullets , it's defensive capabilities are really limited.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
China taps tech training to tackle labor market mismatch | China | 3 | ||
US announce strategies to tackle hacking threat from China, India, Rus | China | 30 | ||
Tackling China's growing wealth gap | China | 1 | ||
Only China can tackle its own dodgy accounting | Economy & Infrastructure | 0 |