Yes yess according to u , AMERICAN system is out of world ,cutting edge ,bleeding edge & french cant built a system in their 7 generations comparable to it .This is what u want to say ,then it let it be .
:cool2:
Those Snipped pics from magazine you post only tell about the capability of SPECTRA but dont give even one reason behind the conclusion and tells how will it fare against American systems
China doesn't have an expeditionary force...I love how you use French contribution at her peak to compare with chinese expedition forces.
Nope... China only sends two warships and one supply ship to fight pirates and those patrols are only three months. There are no other overseas naval operations. As stated, there might be one warship running goodwill port calls.
I said soldiers... not police.
The facts are there, your deployment of combat forces isn't even on the map.
I am not aware that someone have to put them in a map to be recognized by you.China doesn't have an expeditionary force...
Nope... China only sends two warships and one supply ship to fight pirates and those patrols are only three months. There are no other overseas naval operations. As stated, there might be one warship running goodwill port calls.
May I suggest you read sentence one and two together?
Simple math for you, sir. If someone send two warships and one supply ship every three months. How many ships do they send in a year?
Take your time.
I said soldiers... not police.
http://www.uscc.gov/researchpapers/2012/MEMO-PLA-PKO_final.pdf
Mere semantics and I cant open the page.
One infantry platoon is all the combat force China has ever provided to the UN... what is that 100?
Sorry to bust your balls again.
As of December
2008, China had 2,146 officers and soldiers, including
military observers, liaison officials, staff officers and
engineering officers serving in eleven UN peacekeeping operations around the world.
43
http://www.crisisgroup.org/~/media/Files/asia/north-east-asia/166_chinas_growing_role_in_un_peacekeeping
The facts are there, your deployment of combat forces isn't even on the map.
Dam, you are truly juvenile as they said in other threads. Stop derailing the thread. I hate college kids.Indian and NATO forces are combat hardened and have developed and evolved their tactics based on their experience and when compared to PRC who have used not a single tactic other than Human Wave Attack be it Korean War or Sino-Vietnamese War. .............
It's true, Human Wave Attack was the primary tactic adopted by PLA during Korean War and Sino-Vietnam War ....Dam, you are truly juvenile as they said in other threads. Stop derailing the thread. I hate college kids.
It is just one or two ships, for India it is not overseas deployment anyway.
bully? the fact says otherwise. as far as i know china hasn't send in warship to bully philippine, although ph did send in warship to chase down some chinese fisherman. this is quite different than defination of bully, at most china use its economy to exert leverage against its neightbor. french send military to SCS, don't make me laugh. i haven't seen it from any major news media, other than some article from this thread. other than us, i doubt any country has the ability to shut down china at their own backward forcibly.Is China bullying its neighbours -Yes. Will French presence Diplomatically and Militarily there help the neighbours to resist the Chinese bully-Yes
Indian and NATO forces are combat hardened and have developed and evolved their tactics based on their experience and when compared to PRC who have used not a single tactic other than Human Wave Attack be it Korean War or Sino-Vietnamese War.It's true, Human Wave Attack was the primary tactic adopted by PLA during Korean War and Sino-Vietnam War ....
Will you please be consistent within your own post
And that is what
?If you cant understand what I said, Its not my problem, military presence does not always mean exact French military presence. IT can also mean the co-operation and diplomatic support from the French government and their military.
AN/APG-63v3 is for export customers which is derived from AN/APG-79 of F-18SH with superior/bigger antenna and same processing power as of AN/APG-77 of F-22 so in a way it's comparable to F-22's AESA
Hmm... I thought it was a Chinese ship which broke a Philli fishing boat.
You are contradicting your-self. You claimed earlier that British India contributed 2 million soldiers during the world wars. If deployment has to include aircraft, tanks then India didnt have an expeditionary force either.
Expeditionary Force is a generic name sometimes applied to a military force dispatched to fight in a foreign country. The term was particularly common in World War I and World War II.
